Case Study

The first research question is: how can providing better resources and decent financial compensation to public defenders influence criminal verdicts for the indigent population? This question is important because dipartites in resources between public defenders and private attorneys may put the clients of pubic defenders at a significant disadvantage, which could lead to higher rate of conviction in the indigent population (Cornwell,2015). It is an important to study how supplying resources can influence a conviction in order to understand why improving funding in the system is particularly important.

This then brings us to another issue courts and court administrators are facing which is public attorneys versus private attorneys. The justice system should be fair to everyone regardless of their economic or social status. With that being said, people who cannot afford attorneys get a public defender, whereas people with more money can hire a private attorney. The problem with this is that public attorneys have a much bigger case load so they have less time to focus on a client, whereas a private attorney can focus on one client at any given time giving criminals the opportunity to receive a lesser punishment for the same crime. “When one compares the various outcomes of court processes when clients have publicly provided defense attorneys, such as public defenders, and private attorneys at both the state and federal level, the following facts emerge: Defendants with private attorneys

Regarding the effect of campaign contributions with respect to the institution, Gibson discovered that when groups who interact with the decision maker directly make contributions the legitimacy of that court suffers substantially. Interestingly, this effect is more notable in the institution of the state supreme court compared to the state legislature. Gibson concluded that the absence of campaign contributions greatly increased the public perception that the policy maker would be fair and impartial. Knowing this, judges running judicial campaigns would be given more deference if campaign contributions were little to nonexistent and thus plan their campaigns

Through this, we can determine that justices rely more so on their own attitudes than solely on precedent and other legal factors, though they are still important. With this, it is safe to assume that regional and psychological influences, such as political socialization, influence judicial attitudes and have a key role in influencing judicial decisions.

Then Newbridge has its change to invest SDB. If not, how high the price Newbridge

Throughout history, legal institutions have been instrumental in oppressing members of society who are seen as a threat to those in position of power. As such the law has often been used, not as a means of insuring that justice is served, but as a social mechanism of control. Wealth plays a prime factor of evidence in social control. The wealthy and more “high in” people that are suppose to protect us are manuplicators. It is said that they stand by us to protect, but how well do they protect their citizens when one poses a threat in questioning their means. Instead they turn their backs on us and create unjust in order to keep the balance of power.

However, despite its assurances and intentions, the implementation of the law does not always reach its objective of providing defendants with equal and fair treatment. Even though the law unambiguously grants counsel to a defendant, the government does not regulate how effective such counsel is supposed to be. While every case bears varying circumstances, it has become apparent that appointed counsel most often only does the bare minimum of representing a defendant in court. Additionally, “under a contract system individual law firms or attorneys agree to provide for a specified amount of money” (Flemming, 1989, p. 395). As a result, many attorneys partake in the minimum requirement of pro-bono work. Defendants who

A judicial process involves a series of rules undertaken to administer justice through a system of courts defined in a given constitutional law. The lawyers and the interest groups are important actors in any judicial process, (The U.S. Department of State publication, 2008). In the United States, a plaintiff or a defendant has a constitutional right to a fair hearing before judgement. The litigants would always need the lawyers to build their defence or prosecutions cases before the judge or jury. The interest groups are known for influencing the judicial process. In the United States, the interest groups have such as influenced the judges’ appointment, just as a single form of influence. This paper describes in details the roles of the lawyers and interest groups in the judicial process. In addition to the roles, the paper seeks to explain the reasons behind unpopularity of lawyers in the United States since colonial years to present day; the impact of stratification in the legal profession on delivery and quality of legal services provision and how an impartial and unbiased system can allow interest groups to take part in the judicial process.

People often talk about how corrupt the government has become. They often talk about how crooked politicians have become, and how the government needs a complete overhaul. With all of the controversy in the political system at this time, now is a great time to look into political corruption. Politicians often receive contributions from corporations, to help them with the costs of running for office. These contributions could sway the politician's position on an upcoming vote. The results of these votes could help big business, but harm everyday people. The common people can try the same tactics by voting for a politician who shares the same views, or making small donations to the politicians. The contributions the common citizen can make are much smaller than the ones a large corporation can make, so the politicians will often favor the large corporation. This often leads to corruption because the politicians vote for bills and laws that would favor the company that gave them money rather than the citizens who voted for them or made a smaller contribution. People will often say that corruption isn't a big deal because it has been going on forever. They will bring up corrupt tax collectors from the Bible saying that if it existed in biblical times and still hasn't been fixed, what is the point in trying. While it

When thinking of lawyers many people only think about the big picture, two parties in a court room and one party becomes victorious. Lawyers are

With regards to civil cases, these are quite a bit different. Civil cases are proceedings that, in more instances than not, there is a private party, individual, or an official government representative, who has a

This case study discusses how McDonald’s India managed to buck the trend in a struggling economy, its early years and business strategy to get more out of its stores in India. The case also briefly discusses how McDonald’s adapted to local culture in India, its localization and entry strategy, its strong supply chain and pricing strategy.

• Increase ASEAN’s competitive edge as a production base in the world market through the elimination, within ASEAN, of tariffs and non-tariff barriers; and

According to our text, Political Science is a systematic study of government and politics, the research that is produced helps to guide our presentation of the judiciary. The courts are separate and distinct from the executive and legislative branches the principle players have law degrees, use language that is different than ordinary English, and follow formal procedures in court. The courts are interconnected with the Constitution, politics, the president, interest groups, federalism, elections, the media, political parties, and public opinion (Meinhold, 2013).

* The people of Barangay Alangilan lead by Guilbert B. Alea, warmly welcomed our group and helped us to find a location to plant vegetables.