Case Study: MOS Mayer

There are 4 Ps. Ps claim they were unlawfully detained by MOS and falsely arrested on drug charges. Ps allege that they live in a three family private house with apartments on 3 floors. Ps allege that the first floor apartment was of P Yolanda Lopez; second floor apartment was of P Yvonne (non-party), and basement apartment was of Evelyn Lopez and her 17 year old daughter, Karina Lopez. Ps Rafael Rivera and Erin Morales were staying on the first floor. P Rivera alleges that MOS entered the house and order him to get to his knee and P Rivera complied. P Rivera alleges that while he was on his knees MOS struck P Rivera in the face with the riot shield. P Evelyn Lopez alleges that defendant MOS Anthony Hughes grabbed her arm and struck her face against a wall and illegally searched her basement apartment. Defendant MOS John Natoli stated that the search warrant applied to all floors because each family has access other family’s

On 09/02/2015, at approximately 1620 hours, your affiant and officer Moyer received a complaint at the police department from Wayne V. Kechula. Kechula was greeted at the front door by Officer Moyer. Kechula began screaming about a construction tool owned by Wesley Kacilowicz. Kechula stated the male in the vehicle he arrived with borrowed a tool and has not returned it. Kechula stated these events had occurred in Conyngham, Pennsylvania. Officer Moyer explained to Kechula several times that we have no jurisdiction of that area. Kechula became verbally hostile with Officer Moyer.

I arrived on scene and met with the landlord, Michael T. Bryant (M/W, DOB: 09/25/1990), while Deputy Vaughn met with the tenant. Bryant was having an issue with a tenant who agreed to stay at a rental apartment until the unit he was going to rent to them was cleaned and ready to rent. The alleged tentative agreement between the tenant and Bryant was for 15 days in the temporary apartment. Bryant stated when the original rental property was ready to rent, the tenants did not like it and stayed in the temporary apartment. Bryant had a problem with that because the temporary apartment the tenant was living in was already to rent someone else.

There are two Ps (Vance Williams and Rick Williams); they are brothers. P alleges that they were walking on the sidewalk with a friend, Davon Carr (non-party) when undercover officers stopped them. Ps allege that MOS questioned them about guns. P Rick Williams alleges that MOS Ashby grabbed him and slammed him to the ground. P Vance Williams states that MOS was punched him in the neck causing him to have an epileptic seizure. P Vance Williams alleges that MOS maced him. Ps allege they were taken to the 67th precinct. P Vance Williams alleges that at the precinct his request for medical attention was delayed. MOS Ashby states that he observed Ps Rick Williams and Vance Williams with open containers. MOS stopped Ps and Mr. Carr then P Rick Williams

P alleges that he is a drug dealer. P alleges that from March 2010 through January 2011 defendant MOS Tepperman extorted money from him. P claims that when he refused to pay, MOS Tepperman had P arrested. P claims that MOS Tepperman was earsdropping on his cellphone conservation and tracking his whereabouts through GPS. P claims he paid MOS Tepperman money to keep the police away from him. P states that he did sell MOS Tepperman a brick of cocaine in September 2010.

Ps are member of Ramarley Graham’s estate – Constance Malcolm, mother, Patricia Hartley, grandmother, Chinnor Campbell, minor brother, and Franclot Graham, father. Ps allege that MOS unlawfully stopped and killed Ramarley Graham. Ps state that MOS surrounded their house and the front door was locked. Ps allege that MOS gained entry from the backdoor of the first floor tenant’s apartment and after entering MOS unlocked the front door allowing additional MOS to enter the house. Ps state that MOS went to the second floor apartment, Ramarley Graham’s apartment and kicked the door and entered the apartment with their guns drawn. Ps that Ramarley Graham and Ps Hartley and Campbell were in the hallway and MOS did not identify themselves as police

FACTS: In Lexington, Kentucky officers were suspicious of a subject who was suspected to be a drug dealer. The officer initiated an observance of the subject’s movements and followed the subject to an apartment where the odor of marijuana was admitting. The officers made their presence known and immediately heard sounds that the believed were indications that the subject was destroying possible evidence. The officers knocked and explained they were making entry into the room. The officers forcefully enter the apartment and observed the primary subject, additional subjects, and drugs including paraphernalia in the open. The subject was brought to The Circuit Court where the court denied the motion of the defense team to remove the evidence from the case based on the entry of the officers being unjust due to not having a proper search warrant. The defense team entered a guilty plea to obtain the authorization to appeal The Circuit Courts ruling. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed this request which prompted The Supreme Court of Kentucky to reverse the decision. This action was based on the courts assumption that additional exigent circumstances did exist however, it did not proved the officers the proper authorization to conduct a

The first witness who will testify for the prosecution is Officer Bobby Flanegan. This witness will demonstrate that the warrantless search of the defendant’s apartment and backyard was proper. Officer Flanegan will also provide evidence to show that exigent circumstances were present, such as the possibility of a weapon in the possession of the defendant. For example, there was a possibility that gravity knife was in Kelly Robert’s possession at the corner of Chippewa and Franklin. Officer Flanegan will also provide evidence the seizure of the pills in the backyard were for the safety of the children in the daycare center next door. As shown, the hole in the fence that separated the daycare center’s property from that of Kelly Roberts’ demonstrated

Facts: Defendant Wardlow was seen holding a “opague bag”by Officer Nolan. Officer Nolan was driving with fours car, his being the last one. The cars were in a “heavy narcotics trafficking area” examining the area for “drug transactions.” Wardlow saw the police cars and fled the area, even though Wardlow was not doing anything “suspicious.” Officer Nolan seeing the defendant flee, chased and caught the defenfent. When caught officer Nolan did a “protective pat down search for weapons.” Officer Nolan looked at the bag, opened it and found a gun. Wardlow was then arrested by Officer Nolan. Wardlow’s attorney filed a “motion to suppress” the gun, under the action of an “lawful stop and frisk.” The motion was denied by The Illinois Trial Court.

Tommy Ray James, the defendant, was stopped by an officer while driving and after failing to provide insurance the defendant admitted to drinking alcohol and open containers inside the vehicle and then the defendant was then placed under arrest, put in handcuffs, and advised of his rights State v. James, 301 Kan. 898, 1 (2015). The officer then searched the defendant’s vehicle for evidence of open alcohol containers and found what was later determined to be marijuana 301 Kan. at 1. The defendant denied the marijuana being his and said it could be his brother’s 301 Kan. at 1. The defendant however, said he did not know his brother’s phone number 301 Kan. at 1. After stating he did not know his brother’s phone number Tommy offered

P alleges excessive force. P alleges he was on the sideway when defendant MOS Delprete and Vaccarino approached him. P claims MOS Delprete struck him on the side of his face. P alleges that he grabbed the fence and his back was to the MOS. P claims he refused to let go of the fence when MOS ordered him. P states that MOS punched approximately 14 to 20 times in face and head. P claims that he was struck with a flashlight. P claims that he was pepper sprayed in the face causing him to let go of the fence and fall to the ground. P claims that while he was on the ground he was kicked in his side and face causing him to lose consciousness. P alleges that he received 13 stitches to his face and was diagnosed with fracture left eye socket. MOS

P alleges false arrest for criminal possession of a weapon. P alleges that he and his two friends were helping his father in law move. P alleges that he was placing bags into a van when MOS approached and questioned him. P alleges that he informed MOS that he was helping his father in law move out. P alleges that MOS searched him and the bags without consent and recovered an antique long bladed knife and P was arrested. MOS stated that MOS Grieco, who was inside an unmarked vehicle with defendants MOS Mayer and Winters, observed P and two other males walking on sidewalk carrying what appeared to be electronic equipment. MOS Grieco approached P and began to question P. MOS Grieco stated that P did state that he was moving. MOS Grieco observed

P alleges false arrest. P alleges that MOS entered her apartment and placed her, her parents, and brother in handcuffs and had them stand against a wall. P alleges that defendant MOS Jeffrey Sisco inappropriately searched her by touching her inner thighs and buttocks. P alleges that she requested at a female MOS search her and defendant MOS Sico denied it and refused to loosen her handcuffs. Defendant Jeffery Sisco states that he was executing a search warrant after two positive controlled buys were conducted. ESU entered the apartment first and searched and handcuffed everyone then MOS Sisco and other MOS entered the apartment. MOS Sisco does not recall P asking to have her handcuffs loosen and did not search her. MOS recovered narcotics and

P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he was inside his house with his girlfriend when MOS knocked on his door and entered the house. P alleges that MOS informed him that they were looking for a Miguel Tejada and P stated that he did not know the person. P alleges that P provided MOS with his identification. P alleges that MOS grabbed, handcuffed and removed from the apartment. P alleges that he was sexually assaulted during the strip search. Defendant Jose Peinan states that he observed P make a drug to sale to another individual. When MOS went to apprehended P, P went into the house. MOS knocked on the door and asked P to come outside where he was placed under arrested. MOS Peinan identified P as the seller. Criminal

On 02-03-16 at 1153 hours, Officer Cass #2067 and I were dispatched to the Arcadia Police Station for Suspect Parent. Parent had an outstanding Pasadena PD warrant for his arrest. Officer Cass and I arrived at Arcadia PD and placed Parent under arrest for the Pasadena PD warrant. I placed handcuffs on Parent which were double locked. Officer Cass and I transported Parent to the Pasadena Jail where he was booked on the warrant.