Case Study : Management Training Dilemma

Training and Development is imperative to the organization’s progress. Training helps addressing employee weaknesses and builds a reliable and skilled workforce. This will improve the employees’ performance and boost their self confidence, and innovation. By acquiring the needed knowledge and skills, employees can perform more efficiently and increase the overall productivity of the organization.

When the organization invests in training and development to improve the knowledge and skills of its employees, the investment is expected to yield productive and effective employees. The programs could be focused on individual performance or team performance depending on the development need identified by a training needs analysis which helps in the creation and implementation of training and management development programs. In the view of Grobler, Warnich, Carrel, Elbert and Hatfield (2004:345), training needs have to be determined first.

Due to the ever changing landscape of the business world many employers often send their employees to attend trainings and seminars. Though this specialized training sessions are costly the return a company gets from it is worth the investment. A company that constantly sends its employees to school to acquire a fresh and new ideas has a greater advantage than a company that do not offer such benefit.

Training is an important facet of developing and managing human resources at any organization. Training should improve not only organizational efficiency and employee productivity but it must also improve employee skills and make employees feel valued. At Clapton Commercial Construction (“CCC”) Company’s Arizona location, it is important for the company to hire and retain good employees. To that end training and development should be essential and consistently provided to employees at all levels of the organization. Training program should be designed so that it is tailored to the particular function the employees perform in the company, and also so that the company as a whole works as a

Organizational analysis “involves determining the appropriateness of training, given the company’s business strategy, its resources available for training, and support by managers and peers for training activities” (Noe, 2013, p. 114). Organizational analysis has determined that retraining needs to occur in several key areas. Training will be given to managers, on improving communication, motivating and retaining employees through coaching and individual pathway development, with a

Which of the following is NOT an advantage to using externally based training programs for managers?

Management training consists of courses which helps managers to be organized to deal in situations an example for this is observing employees and projects. Many businesses offer this type of training themselves; it can be done in two types of ways workshops and seminars. The advantage of this is that the manager’s confidence would

Training outside of the military affords an organization a different perspective on how to approach existing issue asides from the typical ways of conducting business. Therefore, outside training is beneficial being as it is not military structured but aims at completing the task just with a different methodology. Training and development of employees is a single priority that can pay some of the highest dividends in terms of productivity and profitability as well as aiming toward greater customer satisfaction (Woodman, n.d.). More importantly, delegating some of the more time-intensive training activities to an outside trainer, the employees and company still benefit from the training, and managers are able to attend to other tasks. Another benefit of outside training depending on the level of training required, the trainer may spend several days or weeks learning the specifics of the company.

In the article, Rosner states that avoiding wasting time, production, and precious resources on ineffectual training programs is the ultimate goal for successful training managers. HR representatives need to figure out the solutions to the questions posed in Mr. Rosner’s article. Questions like, what are the reasons for conducting training, is training necessary, what solutions have been used in the past, and what is the expected outcome of training are integral to planning an

Most organizations do not follow-up on the benefits of training as regards staff performance. As a result of this they don’t take training and development as an important factor in organizational growth and survival. Most manages do not know how to assess the return on investment in training, nor are they equipped with the necessary management tools to monitor the decision making process of such investment. It has been discovered that training and development budget is the first cut when the organization is faced with difficulties because most of them are of the opinion that investment in the area of training and development is not linked to the bottom line of the business. Globalization and rapid technological development has changed the conditions for companies and increased competition in the world markets. The quality of a company’s human resources is the key driver for sustained top-level performance. It has become crucial to continually invest in human resource development in order to guarantee success in the global market. As earlier said, managers engage in minimal training thereby not giving quality training to their employees, this in turn affects the overall outcome of the training and the performance of the staff. Most organizations that have a competitive image see more reasons to train their workers than those who are on the lower rung of the ladder of recognition, but training and development is still needed to create a niche. In the light of the above,

Similarly, Longenecker and Fink (2005) assert that the benefits derived from training are manifold, and these include; exposure to new and better practices and ideas for application, leads to reflection, self-appraisal and retrospection, motivates employees to improve performance, encourages career development planning, helps identify specific performance problems and challenges an employee to think differently, to name a few. Other benefits are a more flexible workforce, improved performance of existing employees, decreased supervision, higher skill levels and reduced learning time, thus reducing learning costs, improved organisation morale, and to ensure for succession (Molander 1989).

In the motivation it can motivate managers to better performance not only that but also provide a basis for a system of control. According to. McLane and Atrill(2012) for example in emirates group yearly they The company allocates a certain amount of budget for managers and employees to help them develop their abilities and give them the necessary training courses, but the time and the amount specified in the budget and cannot increase the amount allocated for this purpose, under any

Employee training programs are important in a business' success. Without an effective training program implemented the business could suffer from confused employees, ill direction and incompetence. The new employee can only excel further when taken through a properly planned training program.

To protect competitivenes has been gotten hard with globalization. Because of this reason, companies give big importance to training programs. Because they know that

A training program that is well-designed is proven to achieve maximum results and meet the training needs identified during a training needs analysis. A well-executed training program will increase overall productivity and provide the knowledge, skills, and attitudes the employees need to perform successfully. This paper presents considerations for the design of a two-phase training program for existing employees – a two (2) day program, which covers the training needs to move the company in the right direction.