Case Study: Medicaid Case

The new law added to a per-existing hospital provider tax, which lawmakers love because it leverages federal matching funds that help pay for the state's Medicaid program. Critics objected to the increase because it added a new tax on health insurance.

In the state of Texas Medicaid is funded by state and federal programs. Those eligible to receive Medicare benefit is the low income individuals, families, children, pregnant women, elderly and individuals who suffer with disabilities (Hegar). The Texas Health and Human Service commission (HHSC) distributes the Medicaid (Hegar). Those receiving Medicaid benefits in the fiscal year of 2010 were found to be 55 percent female and 77 percent under the age of 21 (Hegar). Children accounted for 66 percent of all Texas Medicaid recipients in that year; however, 32 percent of those children actually received health care (Hegar).

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, and on June 28, 2012 the Supreme Court decided to uphold the law.¹ Some of the most notable features that the ACA will provide for individuals are access to healthcare for everyone, new consumer protections such as pre-existing condition coverage, free preventative care, protection against healthcare fraud, small business tax credits, as well as many other features.¹

Bill Haslam, the Tennessee state governor, announced that the state of Tennessee would accept the Medicaid expansion offer. The Medicaid expansion expands Medicaid eligibility to the region’s underserved populations living near or below the poverty line. The Medicaid expansion offer looked to be a major win for the state; however, others disagreed with this idea. Some of Tennessee’s lawmakers decided to deny the federal government’s Medicaid offer, even though many others wanted the offer to be accepted. The deal’s breakdown might be the result of “squabbling along party lines” which is a common theme at all levels of government. Although the deal was denied, it is still possible that the bill could still be passed with the help of the governor. The likelihood of Tennessee reviving its Medicaid expansion is a difficult one considering the state would have to fight. The Medicaid expansion could offer the state low-income citizens medical insurance, the state would come out of the deal with a net financial gain, and the state hospitals would come out on top.

Conclusion: The Obamacare has its very good points it does benefit the economy in ways that are meant to take the economy out of debt. But they do cause side effects that may not have been thought of.

Medicaid expansion is seen as a huge problem in this case it takes place among the 50 states. The environment includes the 50 states such as California, Texas, New York and New Jersey. Medicaid expansion offers financial protection. It also addresses the uncompensated care problem which involves paying and reimbursement for service rendered. Medicaid expansion also provides customers access to affordable coverage, as well as customers taking up that cover, which is a moral duty of the government. Medicaid also supports politically powerful interest groups who support expansion. The expansion of Medicaid helps rural hospitals stay afloat in states like Colorado, which added 400,000 people to the health insurance program under

On October 1, 2015, Ms. Booth was approved for Medicaid coverage through the BCC program. It was determined by the Mississippi State Department of Health that Ms. Heigle was eligible to receive Medicaid coverage for two (2) years or during the course of her treatment for breast cancer. The Office of Eligibility issued a Notice of Adverse Action on September 5, 2017, informing Ms. Booth that her eligibility would terminate on September 30, 2017, because her two (2) year treatment period was ending.

Cheryl has been diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Alcohol Use Disorder. When asked about her concerns for post discharge she states that she has been heavily reliant on her parents and their health benefits for her treatment and that she is nervous that she may not have coverage to continue therapy. She reports that she felt safe knowing that “Obamacare” would be in place to help her afford the treatment she needs to stay mentally healthy and sober. She states that she is concerned about the possible repeal of the Affordable Care Act because she will need help paying for her mental health expenses. The Affordable Care Act made a giant leap in extending the work of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. These two acts work together to ensure that treatment for mental illness is accessible to many Americans that need treatment. Throughout this paper I

The fertility rate is an important factor when evaluating the health of the public. Despite the United States having one of the best healthcare systems in the world, approximately 13% of women between the age of 18 & 44 have trouble conceiving. Although the US has implemented the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a landmark policy, assisting millions of Americans in obtaining health insurance, unless altered, the policy could hurt the 3 out of 20 women who struggle with infertility. After evaluating the core essential benefits of the Affordable Care Act, the views of stakeholders, and the state mandates, an easy solution can be established to assist those suffering from impaired fecundity.

With the Advent of the Affordable Care Act, came many changes throughout the medical industry, changes happened in hospitals, health insurance, and doctors. Doctors, more than any other group seem to be affected in a number of way, from the amount of patients, from the increased number of people with insurance plans. It also changed the way a doctor interacts with other parts of medicine. There are some questions arising from this such as; would doctors approve or disapprove of these changes along with do these changes affect the doctors' ability to practice. For the most part, there is no difference the way doctors practice or to their income, but it does have doctors utilize their abilities towards medicine rather paper pushing which could have doctors prefer the post-ACA medical community rather than before.

Toward the end of the 1920s, in a little town in South Texas named Cotulla, a junior high teacher saw the injustice and poverty among his Mexican-American students (Del Bosque, 2013). After decades passed, that same man became the U.S. President; Lyndon B. Johnson signed the bill that constructed Medicaid in 1965, which is a program that is funded by the state and the federal government to provide health insurance to low-income Americans (2013). Johnson had an idea to create a “Great Society” which he defined as “a society where no child will go unfed, and no youngster will go unschooled” (2013) . Now even in 2015, we see that President Obama is still fighting for this dream of Johnson’s (Ura & Walters, 2014). President Obama’s Affordable Care

The healthcare system underwent reformation in 2010 in the form of The Affordable Care Act. The main goal of the ACA was to extend health care throughout the nation; irrespective of this intention, some people regard the Affordable Care Act as being paternalistic. Chapter 9 covers the issue of how ethical the imposition of new restrictions on people by the ACA is.

The decision to reject Medicaid expansion by the former and current governors of Texas has left at least one million low-income earning nonelderly adults Texans uninsured resulting in the loss of several millions of dollars in uncompensated health care services extended to this vulnerable demographic, coupled with high insurance premiums (Mangan, 2015) which begs for the expedient conception and implementation of a statewide solution to address this unsustainable economic burden and create a more healthy, and productive society in the great state of

The testimony given for the Medicaid at 50: Strengthening and Sustaining the Program (Medicaid at 50) begins with Chairman Joseph R. Pitts, representative from Pennsylvania, giving basic information regarding Medicaid, the current status of the program, and the future. Chairman Pitts lays out the basic issue at hand, the growing expense of Medicaid and that currently there are more individuals enrolled in Medicaid than Medicare and those growing numbers are requiring states to make difficult decisions regarding sustainability for the program both at the state and the federal level. In order to address and provide answers, the panel was composed of two women from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and one from the Government Accountability Office.

Crystal is well informed of the changing DSDS policy and procedures, and implements them with no reminders. She is able to quickly identify participants who are eligible for HCB Medicaid and make the appropriate referrals. Crystal continues to show that she understands the importance of confidentiality and HIPAA. She is able to identify eligible adults for HCBS through using the InterRAI assessment tool. Crystal continues to consult with her supervisor on challenges that may come up on cases. She works with other agencies to ensure that participants unmet needs are