Case Study : Nike 's Global Supply Chain

As such, it applied cultural relativism to justify the use of child labor, unsafe labor practices, and near slave labor in its factories. Since then, Nike has been a driving force to ensure fair labor practices across the apparel industry. In 1999, Nike was a key contributor to the establishment of the Fair Labor Association, an organization that is “…dedicated to protecting workers’ rights around the world” (Fair Labor Association, 2016). Today, Nike continues efforts to ensure that contract factories comply with its Code of Conduct to improve labor standards in overseas factories (Nike, 2016). Because of Nike’s efforts to expand and enforce social responsibility at its factories and given the lessons learned from its sordid past, it is unlikely that Nike would resort to any of the straw men fallacies. However, given the pressure by investors to expect solid returns, one hopes the company continues its altruistic social responsibility efforts while veering away from the Friedman Doctrine and its assertion that “… the only social responsibility of business is to increase profits” (Hill, 2011).

Nike has a very sophisticated sustainability strategy. The strategy is based on company’s prospects for future, to ensure that the company remains profitable and reputable, taking into consideration the social responsibility of the company (NIKE 2013). For instance, the strategy is supposed to ensure that the company gains a stable supply for the raw materials for the product manufacturing that will ensure stable supply of the products in the market at favorable prices. The strategy also targets make the company responsive to environmental concerns, aiming at reducing environmental pollution through emissions to the atmosphere (Charter, 2001). The strategy outlines the company

Nike started to open up manufacturing factories in countries like Indonesia, Pakistan and Vietnam. Due to the wants of Nike to increase their revenue they tried to outsource the labor of their products since labor work in the US is very high and expensive. This was a bad idea due to that Indonesia pays their workers extremely low wages. Pakistan doesn’t have an age limit for them to be able to legally to work so many children in Pakistan were making

This paper describes the legal, cultural, and ethical challenges that confronted the global business presented in the Nike sweatshop debate case study. It illustrates Nike’s part in the sweatshop scandal and it also takes a look at the ethical issues that surround this touchy subject. This paper

Internationally recognized companies such as Nike make use of sweatshops and aid in the exploitation of labor workers in many parts of the world. A sweatshop is an industrialized provision that is known to have poor working conditions, infringement of labor law, and long hours coupled with low wages. In today’s world, sweatshops are prevalent all across the globe; however they raise the most concern in developing nations. Nike is one of the world’s most renowned sportswear companies, but has been involved in several controversies in relation to the possibility of them making profit out of sweatshop labor. In the late 1900’s most Nike products were manufactured in countries like South Korea and Taiwan, however, this changed when the labor

1. What responsibility does Nike have for conditions of work at foreign factories making its products?

In the article “Nike Quietly Goes Green” by Reena Jana, Nike realizes that they should keep pursuing their “go green” efforts while making sure their customers are still content with the quality and performance of the shoe. Last year, Nike debuted the Air Jordan XX3 which was made through eco-friendly manufacturing and the company experienced high customer satisfaction and growth in the market. This aligns with the approach that the company creates positive stakeholder externalities while maximizing their profit. In this article, Nike was able to maximize their profit while consumers still benefited by getting high performance shoes. In addition, there were no stakeholders that were negatively harmed such as environmentalists who were against Nike’s

This athletic shoe company expresses it is engaged in social responsibility. This means it is committed to give back to society in activities such as produce goods and services that will not damage the environment and employing workers whose are paid decent salaries while providing safe working conditions. They cannot close its eyes and allow human exploitation to continue to happen.

Forecasting in the fashion industry is usually a complicated due to the fact that it’s characterized by high demand, short product life cycles and different varieties of product lines. Consequently, managing customer demand tends to be difficult, for organizations have to avoid large volumes of stock. In this industry, there’s intense competition and consumers are price conscious; accordingly, these factors have slowed the growth of this industry. As a result, this made it difficult for the companies to create brands which can offer high quality products with cheap prices (Fernino et al., 2012). Nike is one of the most popular brands throughout the whole world and the world’s leading supplier. The company designs, develops and markets

The purpose and intent of this paper is to describe the legal, cultural, and ethical challenges that face the Nike Corporation in their global business ventures. This paper will also touch on the roles of the host government and countries where Nike manufactures their products and the author will summarize the strategic and operational challenges that Nike managers face in globalization of the Nike product.

Supply management is a complex function that’s critical to business success, responsible for delivering efficient costs, high quality, fast delivery and continuous innovation throughout companies’ entire supply chains. The strategic contribution of supply management is measured not only in savings made, but also in increased shareholder value (Niezen, Weller & Deringer, 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their competitive advantage through strategically managing and utilizing their supply chain. The purpose of this report is to compare and evaluate the supply chain management practices of Nike & Adidas.

Multinational companies have been criticised for focusing on their global responsibility in relation to their business style and not about reforming their labour conditions that support sweatshops. Scherer, Palazzo & Baumann (2006) look at an example of Nike which in 1998-2001 had received worldwide backlash due to its exercising of negative labour laws that portrayed negative and an infringement of human rights- creating sweatshops. With Nike being a powerful multinational company, it took a

American business should not be permitted to claim it is an ethical firm if it ignores unethical practices by its international suppliers. For the purpose of this assignment I will use the Nike Company to highlight its unethical practices. Despite the popularity of Nike in the American market, it has been accused of exploiting employees abroad. The corporate social responsibility stipulates that a company should maximize its profit and minimizes its cost in operations and manufacturing, also at the same time benefit the community it operates in. This paper will further elaborate on the global strategy employed by Nike Company as it outsources its goods and the unethical issues its

The aim of this project is show Nike supply chain strategy. Firstly, there are some basic information about Nike, then definition and explanation of supply chain. It can be seen in example of Nike how supply chain works in reality. Secondly there is example of implementing new technologies and software. We can see also explanation of strategic fit and competitive advantage and how Nike achieve it.

The modus operandi of the major apparel corporation has been a controversial issue for the longest time. After a while, it has become evident that whenever Nike moves its operation between countries, it has been to a place with an abundance of lower wage workers (Herbert, 1996). Doing business with independent contractors which are notorious for unethical practices is legal but not