Case Study Of Candidate Brown's Operation Order Brief

SNC conducted an above average analysis of what he expected the enemy to do upon contact. SNC’s scheme of maneuver was vague and could not be executed without significant oversight. SNC’s tasking statements were weak and lacked a purpose. SNC’s formations, particularly his squad column fire team column while in the open area, did not provide effective security en route to his objective. Upon enemy contact SNC stood and began talking to his squad but did not use the ADDRAC format; SNC spoke at just over a conversational tone. SNC directed his squad to suppress the enemy sniper and continue to move to the objective; SNC’s squad laid still while one of the fire team members openly questioned SNC’s decision. SNC changed his mind and directed the

Candidate Lamb posted security prior to the beginning of his brief. Candidates Lamb's brief was delivered confidently, naturally, and not rehearsed. SNC was very comfortable delivery the 5 paragraph order. During his brief, SNC oriented his fire team and provided references to aid in the understanding of his order. Prior to execution, SNC developed an initial plan that included all the elements necessary to complete the mission. During execution, SNC was able to make decisions at points of friction. SNC was able to develop a sensible and comprehensive plan by gathering intelligence and taking suggestions. However, SNC did not rely solely on the suggestions of others to make informed decisions. At points of friction, SNC checked on the

SNC delivered a confident and complete order successfully addressing all paragraphs of the five paragraph order. SNC assigned primary and secondary tasks to subordinates and reiterated the Enemy Situation. SNC properly controlled the fire team’s formation utilizing proper dispersion and smoothly transitioned from column to wedge. Upon enemy contact SNC relayed a clear and effective ADDRAC and directed SNC’s fire team to provide suppressive fire. SNC maintained mission focus when SNC’s fire team took a casualty. SNC directed his fire team in a tactically appropriate manner as they evacuated the casualty. Upon return to MA-2A SNC submitted the map to higher without being prompted by the evaluator. SNC displayed suburb leadership potential

Overall, Candidate Friederick's lack of confidence hindered both her operations order and her execution of her assigned mission. Her delivery lacked enthusiasm and interest. While her lack of confidence indicated unfamiliarity with the five paragraph order, SNC did brief a detailed mission statement with a task and purpose. SNC also briefed some details of her scheme of maneuver and some tasks to her subordinates, but the lack of detail and her confidence ultimately failed to inspire the other candidates in her fire team. As her fire team moved from order to execution, SNC appeared lethargic with little to no awareness of her surroundings as the team approached the objective. SNC both heard and saw the enemy combatant and demonstrated

Candidate Long’s performance was extremely impressive. He started his problem by conducting a detailed leader’s reconnaissance and developing a practical solution to the problem. SNC briefed his peers with confidence and clarity. His order was only missing the “when” part of the mission statement. He was one of the few who physically set in his security and established fields of fire. He lead by example by being the first candidate on the platform and used critical thinking to develop his plan by examining the weights of each member of his fire team. He acted with a sense of urgency but remained calm and collective. Once he established the bridge to complete the problem, he quickly realized he needed the ammo can and sent a candidate

Upon issue of his order to his fire team, it was immediately apparent that Candidate Woodgie took time to think about and develop a clear initial plan. SNC briefed a scheme of maneuver that both outlined his plan to negotiate the obstacles from start to finish and included anonymous, sequential, and thorough tasking statements that painted a very clear picture for his team what needed to be done. This was followed by both specific tasking statements but also the assignment of specific roles in the fire team. SNC also briefed very specific coordinating instructions as tactical control measures indicating an keen understanding of the five paragraph order format. More importantly, those clear instructions further amplified the plan for his

Candidate Hamm briefed his order with confidence and displayed an understanding of the OSMEAC orders process and its organization. He briefed a thorough enemy situation by applying DRAWD analysis. His coordinating instructions also included extra information including order of march, base unit, and consolidation instructions. However, SNC did not brief a scheme of maneuver in the order, forcing him to develop a plan after his brief had concluded. His succession of command was a repeat of the order of march instead of who would assume his billet. SNC was confident in his brief and it was apparent throughout execution that he was in control of the team. Even after friction caused the team to falter, SNC was quick to re-focus the team and maintain

SNC’s five paragraph order was delivered meek tone which lacked authority and command presence; SNC appeared aloof and distant throughout the brief. SNC’s Situation paragraph included fabricated information contrary to what the evaluator briefed; these omissions caused the squad to not understand the mission. SNC briefed specific, relevant tasks but failed to brief any coordinating instructions beyond “attack begins immediately after this order.” SNC briefed Admin and Logistics as “unchanged since the last order.” SNC’s brief was punctuated with filler words. SNC departed towards the objective without the ammo cans required to complete the mission. During movement to the objective, dispersion was poor; at most times 5 candidates were

Candidate Thompson’s order was initially out of order despite addressing the elements successfully. SNC caught himself half way through the order and began to realign his brief by covering details in his plan. SNC seemed unsure of his plan at first and staggered during the initial tasking statements, but once the plan developed his confidence increased throughout execution. Candidate needs to ensure that the team trusts his plan so they will follow his lead. SNC lead his team through his own execution, but at times the team was without direction, which stalled the flow of the operation. SNC addressed security, but directed candidates to hand off weapons to the security element which made them temporarily combat ineffective while they attempted

Candidate Kidd delivered a complete and sequential five paragraph order. Throughout his entire brief, SNC had several pauses due to obvious signs of nervousness and dependency on his OSMEAC template. Nonetheless, his order contained sufficient information for his fire team to execute the mission. During the execution phase, SNC moved his fire team with a sense of urgency as instructed by the order. He was knowledgeable to place them in a column formation for maximum speed. When SNC received unexpected enemy contact, and subsequently received a casualty, he quickly reacted by returning fire and aiding proper aid to the casualty. SNC responded well and in a calm matter during the chaotic situation. Once reaching the objective, SNC was conscious

Candidate Brown started by briefing all major portions of the order to include a well-organized mission statement, which included the “in order to” verbiage, showing understanding of the purpose. She posted security only after briefing the order but checked back on them periodically. Later in the execution phase, the team member assigned to security was standing up and not staying in a tactical mindset. SNC failed to address this lack of discipline. SNC's lack of leader’s reconnaissance caused her significant problems in the execution; she was solely dependent on the two fire team members she sent through before herself. SNC lead her fire team through the obstacle from the back, which did not embrace the leader-fighter concept. She often got

Candidate Oredola got off to a rough start but made a quick recovery during execution of the mission. After receiving the order to brief back to his Fireteam, SNC confused the Situation paragraph of his order and mixed up the enemy situation with the friendly situation when the briefing his Fireteam. SNC lost valuable time when he began executing the mission spending an excessive amount of time making several attempts at his initial plan. Although SNC lost time, he did not lose momentum, SNC had a keen sense of urgency, keeping track of the time remaining to complete the obstacle down to the minute and providing direction to his Fireteam in a firm, confident manner, and keeping his Fireteam focused on the mission objective. SNC was clearly

Candidate Floyd exhibited a basic understanding of the five paragraph order format and briefed most relevant information; however, SNC fumbled with his notes multiple times, briefed the mission out of order within the Execution paragraph, and issued tasking statements that were vague and lacking detail. During the execution, SNC maintained awareness of his team member’s movements and location and controlled the fire team formations with verbal and non-verbal communication skills. When SNC began receiving enemy fire, it took him a moment to recognize and orient to the threat. Once he identified the threat, SNC exhibited good communication skills by issuing a strong confident ADDRAC and relevant orders while rushing the objective. When his team

Candidate Branom’s five paragraph order was extremely detailed, contained information from higher’s warning order, and was one of the few orders that attempted to brief TCMs. However, SNC’s frequent pauses, stumbling of words, and repeating of information caused him to mismanage his time and detracted from an otherwise highly detailed and concise five paragraph order. SNC’s sense of urgency and strong verbal and non-verbal communication with his team directly translated to positive control while traversing a danger area and making contact with the enemy; this strong communication came from a calm and confident demeanor at decision points, causing his team to push through to mission accomplishment. Finally, SNC failed to adequately manage and

Candidate Kampa gave an outstanding brief to his squad, however when giving the azimuth, that information was incorrect. The squad understood their assigned tasks and the execution of the mission. SNC enthusiastically took control of his squad and kept them moving in an expeditious manner. SNC did this by not allowing the terrain to dictate the rate of his movement. SNC instilled confidence amongst his men as well as maintaining good dispersion throughout the patrol. Upon enemy contact SNC gave an ADDRAC but there was some hesitation. Candidate Kampa maintained great communication through the execution of this mission. SNC directed the Aid and Litter team to move the casualty to the objective instead of evacuating the casualty back to Tarawa