Case Study Of Hud Vash Worker

On Tuesday July 7, 2015, at approximately 3:01 PM, Kiana Beekman, (MFCU Investigator) (Beekman) received a call on the state office telephone from HILL, Lucy (Service Facilitator of Lucy Hill Services (LHS). During the conversation, Beekman asked HILL to clarify her role and responsibilities as a service facilitator, in addition to the role and responsibilities of HARRIS, LaFrance as the Employer of Records (EOR) for Medicaid Recipient DANIEL, Rose and MCGHEE, Inocencia as DANIEL’s aide. She was also asked to provide any documentation of training on timesheet submission and approvals that she provided HARRIS and MCGHEE under the Department of Medicaid Services (DMAS) Consumer-Directed care aide program.

On Tuesday March 8th, 2016 Case Conference with Resident Ebony Rice #325 has been conducted with Janette Chirico from DHS , Program Director Felicita Rivera, Housing Program Supervisor Zenobia Garland and Senior Case Manager Ms. Arias. The purpose of this meeting was to address client noncompliance and to come with an exit strategy for this Ms. Rice. Client was asked the reason for her missing ILP meetings and her barrier to obtain permanent housing. Client has a LINCH voucher for the amount of $1515. Client stated that she hasn’t receives any help from facility staff so she is searching for apartment on her own. Ms. Rice has been receiving assistance by the onsite housing department but unfortunately she has been able to link to an apartment

Ms. Balgobin also said she did not work from November 1st through November 14th because she was in the hospital. She did not report being out of work to Hildebrand until this PC. She did not submit any documentation showing to support this nor did she request a rent adjustment.

Housing: Case Manager confirmed and verified that Ms. Williams has been attending housing meetings and that she has been submitting her weekly housing search logs. Ms. Williams has a City FEPS Voucher. Ms. Williams was escort it to go view an apartment by her assigned Housing Specialist and application was submitted. Case Manager encouraged to

Case manager met with client to develop and issue an independent living plan, which indicated client must apply for public assistance benefits within three business days. Client agreed to apply for full public assistance benefits. Client received and signed and appointment notice, which indicated, the appointment date, time, location, and travel directions. A metrocard was provided to client to attend this appointment. Client was notified that he/she must provide proof of applying by 19/13 Client understood and agreed to apply for PA on 1/2/13 and provide proof on 1/2/13 the client was also notified to comply with all follow up HRA appointments to maintain an active public

On this date worker received a call from Ms. Kimbrell, Medicaid Caseworker. Ms. Kimbrell stated Mr. Duncan's nephew who is living at the residence in Curry would need to fill out a Statement from Dependent Relative/Community Spouse form. Because he is living in a home, Mr. Duncan is part owner. She also stated Mr. Duncan would be denied institutional Medicaid because he was not transferred to a long-term facility. However, he could receive hospital Medicaid because he was in the hospital longer than 30 days. The transfer penalty does not apply to hospital Medicaid but if Mr. Duncan ever applies for institutional Medicaid, they would need the person who purchased the home from Mr. Duncan to provide something showing the amount of money he spent

SSA received a phone call from Verna Goecke-PRPV inquiring if the Bond family was aware of Katlyn’s discharge from the facility. She stated that she had not heard from Mr. Bond regarding the discharge notice and according to Katlyn she had not discussed the discharge arrangements with her parents. SSA shared that two messages had been left on Karen Kohn’s cell phone. We discussed that in the event the family did not arrive to the meeting location this morning, PRPV was willing to transport Katlyn to the family home. Verna asked SSA to email the family’s home address in the even they needed to transport Katlyn to the home.

Reporting party (RP) stated he arrived at the facility to meet with resident George Dixon (7/11/52) on 3/29/17. Resident was recently placed at the facility after being released from the hospital. Staff did not allow RP to enter the facility so that he could conduct his metal health assessment for the resident. RP presented his business card from his agency but was still denied entry. The resident has been enrolled in RP's program since 02/01/16 and has been visited previously by Social Worker Kathy Kleinman and by staff Denise Ramirez on 3/10/17. Staff told RP that he has to contact the administrator to make an appointment to visit with resident. RP's agency faxed over the consent for treatment to the facility and the DMH contract. Patient's

The main problem is that some agencies within the Department of Veterans Affairs across the States have been rigging client schedules in an illegal fashion for different illicit, unprofessional purposes. One can only imagine the disorder that this practice causes. Not only does it wreak havoc on clients that are in need of a health care service but also provide, if not stopped, institutionalization of an illicit practice which in turn breaks down transparency and accountability. It is therefore important that policy-makers and the new heads of the Department act as quickly as possible in order to make critical short-term changes that will eventually make way for long-term goals. One major consequence of this problem is that supervisors were asking staff to alter the scheduling sheets in order to “meet” the fourteen day goal required to attend a veteran (Cohen, 2014). In other words, fourteen days is the appropriate span of time that the local agency has to call up a veteran to provide him/her with the suitable health service. Because of mounting pressures of trying to meet this goal the local agencies, seeing there were too many patients and impediments, made up unofficial lists of those patients they were going to make wait longer and only input those patients they knew could be called up within

The person served was admitted to the Bridgeway Supportive Housing Team on 2/28/15 with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and opiate dependence. She is not currently prescribed any medications, as per her verbal report. The person served did not have insurance since moving back to this area from North Carolina. She has been working on getting this reinstated. Supportive Housing staff have linked her to social services in an effort to get insurance. This was done on 3/26/15 with follow up calls on 4/22 and 5/5/15. Due to this linkage, she was able to get linked to mental health and psychiatric services. However, she has meanwhile reported to staff on 6/19/15 that she has plans to see a psychiatrist (Dr. Moss) in Flemington, and that she is saving

Since then, Michael assisted a homeless Veteran as his employment case worker and acted outside his scope of duty by sending emails, calling and requesting property inspection for his Veteran client by contacting Property manager in regards to property inspection for the Veterans, then email to all parties involved, unintentionally caused disturbance and distrust between Veteran and Partner Agencies such as; HUD-VASH case worker, Bernadette Blanton, and Tampa Crossroads case worker, Andrea

I- CM inquired if client returned LA Family Housing’s call to set up his CES assessment appointment. CM made client call LA Family Housing during the session, because client has not been able to make an appointment. CM informed client that he requested a dental consult with the VA liaison. CM inquired if client visited the Bob Hope Patriotic Hall to start his application for getting the “Veteran” label on his CA driver license. CM continued to inquire if client was interested in creating a savings plan. CM continued to assess client’s mental health and medication compliance

I received a call from Mr Kevin Ziegler regarding her son’s benefits has been reduced. Mr Ziegler stated that his son Kyle, is receiving in Home Care benefits and his mother Patricia Ziegler is the home care provider, through Resource Connections of Oregon (RCO). They received a notification informing them that as a result of a new assessment tool her hours have been cut more than

Kris, the Program Director of Services immediately placed a phone call to notify Jay of the inspector’s request. Not knowing what the next step should be Jay, decided to give his longtime attorney Fred Fleagle a phone call to be advised on how to handle the request. Fleagle advised against letting the inspector review any information without a warrant. For a second opinion Jay called Mr. B. Yuri Kratt, head of state agency overseeing group homes for the mentally retarded. Kratts initially decided to look into the matter and agreed with the advice of Fleagle. An hour later, Fleagle called back advising him to that the he would not be able to help with the matter and to call Warren Belle of New Horizon Homes for more information. Belle a competitor that had similar policies advised him to comply with OSHA’s request to avoid fines such as the ones he received. After hanging up the call Jay was quite concerned enough to place another call to his attorney. Freagle felt Jay should consider his original advice and stand his ground with OSHA. If that did not work he offered to put in a few calls to his Republican friends in government in efforts to stop OSHA from reviewing the

Per our conversation this morning, I attended a meeting with Antoinette Elliott (AE) and her CHA case worker. During the meeting we discussed several things, that were an issues of concern, and I felt more clarity was needed. The biggest concern was surrounding AE rent portion. AE presented text messages from her LL about her rent increase that was effective 6.1.2017. The issue was her rent prior was $105 and jumped to $418. Although AE son was taking off her voucher (from what P believed at the time) I still could not understand how her rent would jump that high. I asked AE to provide the letter that was sent to her from CHA, and AE stated that she never received one, and the only notification that she received was via text.