Case Study Of MOS Grieco

I asked STINSON if he had anything on him and if I could search him. Stinson verbally consented allowing me to search his person. Upon searching his person, nothing illegal was found. I asked STINSON if I could search his pink back pack that he was wearing. STINSON stated "I rather you not." I asked STINSON if there was something illegal in the back pack. STINSON replied yes. I asked STINSON what he had illegal in his back pack. STINSON stated he had a "little bit of weed." Upon STINSON admitting to me that he had illegal narcotics in his back pack, I conducted a probable cause search of the back pack. Upon opening the front pocket of the back pack, I found a silver spoon with a white powdery substance on the spoon. The spoon was partially sealed within plastic. I conducted a field test on the white powdery substance on the spoon following instructions on the test kit. The test kit showed turned

On November 19, 2016 I went to Price County Superior Court from 9:30am-12pm. I watched the court session in room 202A of case #16-077-01126 between John Lewis and the State of Washington. Present in the courtroom was Judge Whitener, prosecutor Lewis of WA state, John Lewis the defendant representing himself, an appointed court member to assist the defendant, Deputy Kevin Pressel who gave the witness testimony, and lastly the court reporter, clerk, and bailiff (no jury). In this case, Lewis driving a truck was being followed by another vehicle who also reported that Lewis shot a revolver out his window. The two vehicles ultimately crashed and police were called to the scene. Pressel was first to arrive and identified and detained Lewis. Soon after Pressel identified a firearm in the truck, but Lewis denied he had a firearm and thinks it was planted by the people in other vehicle. The court session today between Lewis and WA State, was questing the legality of Pressel taking the Firearm from the vehicle without warrant and if the firearm is tampered evidence.

There are 4 Ps. Ps claim they were unlawfully detained by MOS and falsely arrested on drug charges. Ps allege that they live in a three family private house with apartments on 3 floors. Ps allege that the first floor apartment was of P Yolanda Lopez; second floor apartment was of P Yvonne (non-party), and basement apartment was of Evelyn Lopez and her 17 year old daughter, Karina Lopez. Ps Rafael Rivera and Erin Morales were staying on the first floor. P Rivera alleges that MOS entered the house and order him to get to his knee and P Rivera complied. P Rivera alleges that while he was on his knees MOS struck P Rivera in the face with the riot shield. P Evelyn Lopez alleges that defendant MOS Anthony Hughes grabbed her arm and struck her face against a wall and illegally searched her basement apartment. Defendant MOS John Natoli stated that the search warrant applied to all floors because each family has access other family’s

P alleges temporary loss of his dog and false arrest. P alleges he was holding his dog on a leash on the street when MOS grabbed and threw him to the ground causing P to let go of the leash. P alleges that the dog lunged towards defendant MOS and MOS shot at the dog. P alleges that he was cuffed and taken to the precinct and defendant MOS took his dog to an animal dog as a lost dog. P alleges that he had to pay $280 to retrieve his dog back. P alleges that MOS did not allow his tied his dog up. P alleges that the criminal charges were, later, dismissed. No other information is known about the case. It is unclear what role, if any, Defendant MOS Jeffrey Sisco, played in this

There are two Ps (Vance Williams and Rick Williams); they are brothers. P alleges that they were walking on the sidewalk with a friend, Davon Carr (non-party) when undercover officers stopped them. Ps allege that MOS questioned them about guns. P Rick Williams alleges that MOS Ashby grabbed him and slammed him to the ground. P Vance Williams states that MOS was punched him in the neck causing him to have an epileptic seizure. P Vance Williams alleges that MOS maced him. Ps allege they were taken to the 67th precinct. P Vance Williams alleges that at the precinct his request for medical attention was delayed. MOS Ashby states that he observed Ps Rick Williams and Vance Williams with open containers. MOS stopped Ps and Mr. Carr then P Rick Williams

P alleges that he is a drug dealer. P alleges that from March 2010 through January 2011 defendant MOS Tepperman extorted money from him. P claims that when he refused to pay, MOS Tepperman had P arrested. P claims that MOS Tepperman was earsdropping on his cellphone conservation and tracking his whereabouts through GPS. P claims he paid MOS Tepperman money to keep the police away from him. P states that he did sell MOS Tepperman a brick of cocaine in September 2010.

On the above date and time, I (Dep. Kelley-Dinkins) saw Inmate Cortez Washington open cell 41 door after standing outside waiting for it to be open. I yelled out to ask Inmate Washington was he going in to stay, because he was out for rec. He did not reply, he just stood there. Inmate Washington was later seen turning his back to the day room and when he turned around I saw the door to his cell cracked open. Inmate Washington then looked over to the deputy panel where I was sitting. I motioned for him to come to me. Washington stepped to the panel and tried to explain that he wanted his cup. I told Washington he would receive a disciplinary

P alleges assault and false arrest. P claims he was a guest at a party when MOS arrived and recovered a firearm on the ground. P claims that he was not in possession of a firearm. P alleges that he was falsely arrested for criminal possession of weapon, sprayed with mace, and assaulted by MOS. Defendant MOS states that they were responding to a radio run for shots fired and a vehicle fleeing the scene. While canvassing the area, MOS observed a party in a yard which had very loud music playing and people were drinking in the street. Sgt. Arquer entered the party through the main entrance to shut down the party, and MOS Mayer entered through the side gate. As Sgt. Arquer was speaking to an individual, MOS Mayer observed P walking in his direction

FACTS: In Lexington, Kentucky officers were suspicious of a subject who was suspected to be a drug dealer. The officer initiated an observance of the subject’s movements and followed the subject to an apartment where the odor of marijuana was admitting. The officers made their presence known and immediately heard sounds that the believed were indications that the subject was destroying possible evidence. The officers knocked and explained they were making entry into the room. The officers forcefully enter the apartment and observed the primary subject, additional subjects, and drugs including paraphernalia in the open. The subject was brought to The Circuit Court where the court denied the motion of the defense team to remove the evidence from the case based on the entry of the officers being unjust due to not having a proper search warrant. The defense team entered a guilty plea to obtain the authorization to appeal The Circuit Courts ruling. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed this request which prompted The Supreme Court of Kentucky to reverse the decision. This action was based on the courts assumption that additional exigent circumstances did exist however, it did not proved the officers the proper authorization to conduct a

The first witness who will testify for the prosecution is Officer Bobby Flanegan. This witness will demonstrate that the warrantless search of the defendant’s apartment and backyard was proper. Officer Flanegan will also provide evidence to show that exigent circumstances were present, such as the possibility of a weapon in the possession of the defendant. For example, there was a possibility that gravity knife was in Kelly Robert’s possession at the corner of Chippewa and Franklin. Officer Flanegan will also provide evidence the seizure of the pills in the backyard were for the safety of the children in the daycare center next door. As shown, the hole in the fence that separated the daycare center’s property from that of Kelly Roberts’ demonstrated

Facts: Defendant Wardlow was seen holding a “opague bag”by Officer Nolan. Officer Nolan was driving with fours car, his being the last one. The cars were in a “heavy narcotics trafficking area” examining the area for “drug transactions.” Wardlow saw the police cars and fled the area, even though Wardlow was not doing anything “suspicious.” Officer Nolan seeing the defendant flee, chased and caught the defenfent. When caught officer Nolan did a “protective pat down search for weapons.” Officer Nolan looked at the bag, opened it and found a gun. Wardlow was then arrested by Officer Nolan. Wardlow’s attorney filed a “motion to suppress” the gun, under the action of an “lawful stop and frisk.” The motion was denied by The Illinois Trial Court.

P alleges excessive force. P alleges he was on the sideway when defendant MOS Delprete and Vaccarino approached him. P claims MOS Delprete struck him on the side of his face. P alleges that he grabbed the fence and his back was to the MOS. P claims he refused to let go of the fence when MOS ordered him. P states that MOS punched approximately 14 to 20 times in face and head. P claims that he was struck with a flashlight. P claims that he was pepper sprayed in the face causing him to let go of the fence and fall to the ground. P claims that while he was on the ground he was kicked in his side and face causing him to lose consciousness. P alleges that he received 13 stitches to his face and was diagnosed with fracture left eye socket. MOS

P alleges false arrest. P alleges that MOS entered her apartment and placed her, her parents, and brother in handcuffs and had them stand against a wall. P alleges that defendant MOS Jeffrey Sisco inappropriately searched her by touching her inner thighs and buttocks. P alleges that she requested at a female MOS search her and defendant MOS Sico denied it and refused to loosen her handcuffs. Defendant Jeffery Sisco states that he was executing a search warrant after two positive controlled buys were conducted. ESU entered the apartment first and searched and handcuffed everyone then MOS Sisco and other MOS entered the apartment. MOS Sisco does not recall P asking to have her handcuffs loosen and did not search her. MOS recovered narcotics and

Facts: Four houses in Monroe area were broken into and jewelry was stolen in May of 2004. Derek Cole manager of a bar connected to the Travel Inn in Monroe contacted the police because he believed that Ouellette (defendant) and his friend were using counterfeit money in the bar. Police apprehended the defendant and his friend and took them into custody. Police inquired with the prospector to determine if a warrant was needed to search the room the defendants were staying at. Prospector stated none was needed if this search was conducted after check out time. The room located at the Travel Inn was then searched after receiving the inn keepers consent and after the designated check out time. Officers found items that

P alleges false arrest. P was arrested for shooting CW Flaming St. Fleur (non-party). At Grand Jury, Mr. St. Fleur testified that he was shot and turned around saw P standing there. P was indicted by a grand jury. Mr. St. Fleur went to the precinct and recanted his identification of P to Det. Torres. Det. Torres informed Mr. St. Fleur to go to the DA’s office. On 11/3/2008, Mr. St. Fleur spoke with ADA Thomas McManus and recant his identification of P. Mr. St. Fleur identified another person as shooter and claimed to the person in the neighborhood. P was incarcerated when Mr. St. Fleur stated seeing the shooter of the street. Criminal charges were, later, dismissed. P was incarcerated for more than 10 months. Mr. St. Fleur stated in an affidavit