Case Study Of Michael Smith's Leveling Tool For Cmip

In the event that Kelly Steems is found guilty, he should be given three years in prison. Three years seems like an odd number to give, but a number of ideas should are taken into consideration that make three years a suitable punishment. Mr.Steems is being charged under sections 249(3) and 267 of the Criminal Code, which both carry maximum punishments of ten years. One of the objectives of sentencing is to deter the offender and others from committing offences. Although Drew Morrie was not seriously injured, Steems must be deterred from doing it again. Three years is not so long to be considered an unjust punishment, yet it is long enough to prevent him from doing it again. No one wants to spend three full years in prison. Additionally, he

Jamina Briggs is a 32-year-old African American female initially admitted to Memphis Mental Health Institute (MMHI) August 1, 2013, pursuant to provisions of T.C.A. §33-7-301(a) for an evaluation and assessment of competency and mental condition at the time of the alleged offenses of two counts of first degree murder of her children. She was discharged on September 26, 2013 as not competent and a recommendation for commitment. On November 11, 2013 Ms. Briggs was admitted to Western Mental Health Institute (WMHI)for continued treatment and competency training pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. §33-7-301(b). On April 4, 2015 Ms. Briggs was discharged from WMHI as competent with support for the insanity defense. Following the court’s decision of not guilty by reason of insanity, Ms. Briggs was evaluated by West Tennessee Forensics, an outpatient provider, and subsequently admitted to WMHI pursuant to provisions of T.C.A. §33-7-303(c). Aggressive and assaultive behaviors while at WMHI

On 03/31/17, Mr. Plaches was charged with Violation of Probation and sentenced to 24 Years at supervision level 5 with credit for 64 days previously served balance of sentence is suspended for 1 year level 4 Home Confinement, followed by 7 years at supervision level 3 (CRA#VS100079404).

Darren DelPapa is a sixteen year old male who is currently on courtesy probation supervision in Portsmouth, for charges that occurred in Chesapeake. Charges before the Chesapeake Juvenile and Domestic Relations court were possession of drug paraphernalia, amended from possession of a controlled substance and a curfew citation. The charges were taken under advisement for a period of one year, and Darren was allowed to enroll in the Commonwealth Challenge program in Virginia Beach. He was ordered onto probation, at any time he was not in the Commonwealth Challenge program. Program requirements of the Commonwealth Challenge program do not allow individuals to be on probation as a condition of entry, hence the order of the court. Darren

Background checks were completed for Daniel Abbott and Elizabeth Ruyle. Daniel Abbott was negative for CANTS (12/8/2015). FBI (12/8/2015) and Illinois State Police (12/8/2015) were positive. Mr. Abbot was arrested on 08/05/2001 for driving under the influence of alochol. He was charged with a DUI. He plead guilty, paid the fines, and attended six classes. Mr. Abbott was clear with records for his fostercare license under his name. Mr. Abbot no longer drinks. Inquiries into the National Sex Offender Registry (1/22/2016) and the Illinois Sex Offender Registry on (1/21/2015) revealed no offenses for Daniel Abbot. Elizabeth Ruyle was negative for CANTS (12/8/2015). FBI (12/8/2015) and Illinois State Police (12/3/2015) were positive. Ms. Ruyle

On April 21, 2016, I was assigned this case to follow up. This investigation involves Mr. Andrew Ryan Scharnweber a fifteen year old City resident. I had previously interviewed Mr. Scharnweber for running away from home (16-119393) in March of 2016. He has only two incidents of running away from home and was interviewed using a ripp assessment form in the prior incident.

Mr. Max Rios, a 35-year old divorced male, who has been incarcerated at the Cook County Department of Corrections for several months, has been waiting for his trial. As the Cook County Jail is primarily for holding pre-trial detainees, he was recommended by the local criminal justice system for a psychological evaluation before his trial due to numerous encounters with the law. Before the psychological evaluation was performed, Mr. Rios’s medical and juvenile/adult criminal records were requested to be examined along with a meeting with his ex-wife, former employer and parents. According to his medical records, Mr. Rios shows a history of anxiety along with episodes of depression also. As for his criminal record and a background check, it showed a history of problems with the legal system regarding extortion, aggravated assaults, identity theft, money laundering and numerous arrests for minor misconduct offenses along with a string of civil suits as well.

John Doe is an offender who has been in and out of trouble since he was a teenager. John Doe caught his first charge on 02-04-2000 at the age of 16 for possession of drug paraphernalia, passion with attempt to sell and deliver Marijuana a SCH. VI, attempt to sell and deliver Cocaine SCH. II, and maintain dwelling. On 08-09-2000 the offender was then charged with possession with attempt to sell and delivery of Marijuana, maintain and dwelling, and felony conspiracy. A month after that on 09-26-2000 the offender was charged with assault on a female. In 05-08-2001 the offender was charged again with the sale of SCH. II(90-95(A)(1) NC), PWIMSD Cocaine (90-95(A)(1) NC), Sale and Delivery of controlled substance Cocaine (90-95 NC). In April of 2002

In the novel Enrique’s Journey I feel Enrique is a perpetrator of crime. He unlawfully enters the US in the hope of finding his mother. Yes, it is a heartbreaking story, but that still does not excuse the fact that he broke the law. There are some dangers when attempting to illegally enter the US such as death and diseases. Death is a concern for the person trying to enter the US; they can be killed along the way by countless different ways, such as: Starvation, dehydration, burns, falling off of trains, freezing, and murder. They also can bring diseases into the United States that can kill many. When Unaccompanied Alien Children are apprehended Border Patrol and other guards are forced to watch and care for them. Some children may have diseases and a guard may catch it. Many undocumented people lack basic vaccinations. This is not only affecting the person who is travelling, but others around them too.

In the Matter of R-A-M the Board of Immigration Appeals determined that possession of child pornography is a particularly serious crime. The Board of Immigration Appeals made this determination by considering the nature of the offense, the specific facts, and the circumstances of the crime. The Immigration Judge determined that possession of child pornography was an aggravated felony. The Immigration Judge does not feel that the respondent has been convicted of a particularly serious crime. I agree with the legal conclusion of the Board of Immigration Appeals because I feel that child pornography is a serious offense that can directly relate to the sexual abuse of children.

Richard’s first arrest, the beginning to his extensive criminal history, occurred at age 13 for trespassing and was followed by numerous other arrests over the better half of a decade. When he was 21 years old, Richard was found guilty of forging a fellow co-worker’s

When working with this specific population mental health professionals are often called on to evaluate and manage sex offender’s behavior. There are also times when individuals may be asked to give an opinion as to if the offender will repeat the behavior. Often times people that work with this population are referred to as (SOSs) Sex Offender Specialists. They have a specific group of diverse training and background. Some of these trainings incIude but are not limited to cognitive-behavioral, psychopharmacological, and therapeutic orientations.

Klein, M. (2012). Special Council on Criminal Justice turns its Attention to the Kids. Retrieved from http://www.mikekleinonline.com

With the escalation of murders and rapes committed by minors as seen in recent years the people are looking for the right answer. Public concern over the effectiveness of the juvenile courts when dealing with these offenders has brought about change in the justice system. (Stolba, 2001). The courts now, are quicker to transfer a juveniles’ case to adult court than when the juvenile system was first formed. There stands a conflict of interests within the two court systems. Juvenile courts are to protect the rights of youths determined incapable of adult decisions. The primary concern is that the youth be rehabilitated and not become a repeat offender. Thus, protecting the child from incarceration with adult criminals and any possible future victims. The concerns of the adult court is to make sure the convicted offender pays for their crime and that the victim gets justice. Rehabilitation is not a primary concer of the adult justice system.

Based on the Evaluation conducted on Mr. smith, it is with my greatest of opinions that things should go as follows; when it comes to the victim there seems to be no risk of Mr. smith trying to reestablish contact with them at all and hence no need for a stay away order to be placed. This is based on the fact there is such a low risk of him reoffending with the same victim not even a temporary stay away order needs to be put in place at best, as for his mental status it would of great interest that Mr. smith continue with suggested therapy and counseling as to help with his depression along with being medicated for his night terrors with trazadone. Although Mr. smith should be reevaluated for to possibly put on some anti-depressants for his ongoing depression issues and suicidal thoughts.