Case Study Of Sita Devi Danwar

“Dadi’s Family” observes what a “traditional” family in Haryana, India is like and the issues / concerns the family faces in “modern” times. In the documentary "Dadi 's family", the film explores the concept of family and the roles that a woman play in life. The roles are daughter, sister, mother, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, and sister-in-law. These roles are portrayed to us via various members of Dadi 's family. In this family, we have Dada and Dadi (grandmother and grandfather) as the head of the family. We have the two older sons, Meherlal and Mohinder who are married to Darshini and Sita respectively. The youngest son, Rajinder gets married to Kanta in the film. Dadi and Dada also have two daughters Anguri and Saroj who aren’t shown too much in the film but are married in other villages.

The case of ethical dilemma concerns a fifty-year old woman who was admitted in the hospital complaining of vomiting, indigestion and weight loss signs and symptoms. After conducting barium X-Ray and gastroscopy it was found out by doctors that the patient was suffering from malignant kind of gastric carcinoma and hence further diagnosis and treatment will have to be conducted in relation to the disease the patient was suffering from. Doctors suggested a palliative surgery for reducing stenosis but felt it before time to disclose this information to the patient which was cemented after proper consultation with the patient’s husband who said that her wife would overreact in a situation like this as she had a phobia regarding tumors and cancer diseases.

Unfortunately, she was in place to protest the procedure, she needed help. Nor could her relatives do anything for her. Her many health problems needed to be looked at but the doctors do more than

The hospital had two options for treating patients who could not pay. At first, the hospital

23 year old Sikh, Mindy Sanghera, was described to be a highly intelligent, straight-A student at Birmingham University. She intended to become a dentist after finishing up her last year in dental school in 2007. (Britton) In the summer of 2005, she met a Muslim man named Sair Ali through a friend, and the two began a relationship. Sair was in an eight year engagement with his cousin Sana, and was soon to be married. Despite his commitment to Sana, he continued to be in a relationship with Mindy concealing his fiancé. (Daily Mail [A]) Mindy’s feelings for Sair grew intensely and she wanted more commitment from him. Sair took advantage of their contrasting religious affiliations, to convince her that it was putting tension on their relationship,

A Miami doctor, Anjali Ramkissoon, whose actions were widely ridiculed after a video surfaced in January of her having a meltdown after an incident with an Uber driver, was fired Friday.

On 3/29/2017, this writer met with Mary Eckola alongside with Adriana upon request in the event that the patient assigned counselor is not available. During the discussion, it was based on addressing the overpayment of the patient and her significant other. Also, HCRC continues to send the patients medical record to the insurance company, but no payment. Adriana discussed about payment options, referring to an 8 week payment plan for Mary and her significant other as Mary appeared to the receptive the notion of the payment plan. Mary was very forthcoming about paying the entire balance of her balance and her significant other, but wants to be certain that should be pay the balance that there will be no other issue with this matter. According

In the given case, County’s application is nonconforming with that criterion because in usually when there is some conflict occurred or both the parties go with opposite opinion at an issue, then they generally approaches to the courts to get acceptable solution. In this case, open heart surgery, no party will wait, it can be given to them who have truth with them, and the other who does not have truth they will be rejected. In addition, generally the state agencies have complete awareness

The parents agreed and to continue her treatment, the patient needed a compatible donor, but from the start, looking at the patient’s tissue typing, the doctor already knew that it would be difficult to find a donor. The patient had 2 siblings, the age of 2 and 4, but they were too young to be organ donors, and the rest of the family wasn’t “histocompatible”1. However, the father was and so the nephrologist meets with the father and also lets him know “the uncertain prognosis for his daughter even with a kidney transplant” . Hearing this, the father did not accept to donate his kidney, reasoning that his daughter had gone through enough, including other reasons that she could have a cadaver kidney and also that he didn’t have the courage to donate his kidney. Unfortunately with the father’s decision, he also insisted that the physician tell the family that he wasn’t histocompatible when in fact he was. He reasons that if the family knew he didn’t want to donate, this would “wreck his family”2 and make them believe that he allowed their daughter to die. Even though the doctor didn’t agree with this decision, at the end he did lie and stated that “the father could not donate a kidney for ‘medical reasons’”2. In the course of thoughts, the doctor was presented a dilemma, to lie or not to lie, and to know which decision was

The two cases show that, although the doctors using different ethical approach, they may end up making the same

Kelsey was born August 1, 1984 was living healthy until she became 10 months and brought to the hospital with distended stomach. The doctor happens to be father’s boss an oncologist pediatrician, diagnosed Kelsey as bilateral Wilm’s Tumor, which is very treatable but was a serious condition. But the tumor was diagnosed early according to the doctor. Like any other parents, Kelsey’s parents were also shocked and sad about her situation. They were in and out of the hospitals for the treatments for weeks and months. But no matter what the family trusted the health system, their treatments, providers and thought they were in safe hands. During the treatment process of Kelsey, they were also learning a lot about Wilm’s tumor. And Since, Kelsey’s tumor was bilateral, within first week Kelsey’s one kidney was taken out and part of the other we removed. Father mentions he was learning a lot about the

All the patients have the right to equally treatment and the doctor has the responsibility of protecting all

: The real problem was, the patient has not taken care well by the health care professional, while the patient really deserves a better care. There was no relative for the patient, I was pretty much taking care of everything for the patient.

As a doctor, to prepare myself to take on this case I would have to process a substantial amount of information and use my best judgment to conceive what the best plan of action regarding this case should be. Reviewing the four key principles in medical ethics: nonmaleficience, beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice, would prove to be very helpful. After reviewing and consulting with my peers I would most likely conclude that the patient is the one receiving the service and is to be put first above all other factors contributing to the situation.

Joanna is an experienced nurse taking care of Mrs. Kelly, who was Joanna’s patient many times in the past for her primary problem which is COPD. This time Mrs. Kelly was admitted with complaints of abdominal pain what was different from her primary diagnoses. Her vital signs were with normal limits and no significant changes from privies results, but for the nurse she looks sick, and Joanna know that something is wrong. She calls the resident doctor, but he tell her to watches and calls back with series changes. Joanna multiple attempts to report that something needs to be done to evaluate the cause of Mrs. Kelly pain was ask to calm down. However nobody took patient symptoms series and the next day patient died.