Case Study Of The 2006 AOL Package

In Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614 (2004), a supreme court case, “Buck Doe” sued for damages when his social security was displayed on many of his court documents when he sought damages in the Black Lung Benefits Act. The documents were in an online databases which was a privacy breach. He claimed having his information open for anyone to see caused him distress, and he sought damages under the Federal Privacy Act of 1974. He was awarded damages.

Any change in the factors that make up the macro-environment can have a direct impact on the Comcast Corporation. These factors can affect the Porter Five Forces that shape their strategy and their competitive advantage over other firms.

Netflix was founded in 1997 with the intent to revolutionize the way in which consumers watch movies and television shows. Their accomplishments both in innovation and in customer base for their service indicate that the firm has been, and continues to be, successful in doing so. Currently, the

Company "privacy statements" and "End User License Agreements"(EULAs) also change the expectation of privacy in ways that may not be clear without extended reading [12]. In the case of a merger between DoubleClick and Abacus Direct, in which DoubleClick was acquiring Abacus Direct, what was considered a legal use of data for each company individually constituted a breach of privacy if combined [13]. As the expectation of privacy is based on public perception and understanding, continuing technological advancement and the precedents set by court rulings on cases involving privacy will alter these expectations in the

Furthermore, as Teresa Lucas states in a 2012 issue of the Idaho Librarian, Section 217 demands Internet Service Providers to hand over their client’s internet search history.

In the second quarter of 2000, AOL settled with the SEC with regard to its’ previously discussed controversial accounting policies. AOL agreed to pay a $3.5 million fine and to reissue earnings statements for years 1995 and 1996. By so doing, it wiped out all the profits the company had made. In the 4th quarter of 2002, AOL registered its’ first decrease in subscriptions with a loss of 200,000 members. Every quarter after that showed additional losses, until at the spin off in December

In 2006 AOL, inadvertently, made public personal information, of some 650,000 of its members. “The members filed suit with California federal district court, on behalf of themselves and a putative nationwide class of AOL members, alleging violations of federal electronic privacy law, 18 U.S.C. § 2702(a). A subclass of AOL members who are California residents also alleged various violations of California law, including the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code § 1770.” (Doe 1 v AOL LLC, 2009)

Without a warrant, searching through a person’s intimate records is considered illegal and unconstitutional according to the U.S Fourth Amendment. However, these infractions are still being committed today, some are even being committed by the U.S government. When the government agreed upon the Patriot Act, after the law was signed, confidential agencies were formed, such as, the NSA. The NSA was assembled by the government to collect and store data secretly, this information is received from popular internet companies and phone companies. The NSA derives information from a total of nine American Internet companies, and tracks millions of Americans using data from Verizon, AT&T, and BellSouth. By court order, Verizon is forced to provide

The Fourth Amendment allows electronic surveillance to be used to help solve crime while still protecting privacy. The NSA and FBI are looking directly into nine U.S. internet companies, extracting audio and video chats, photographs, emails, documents, and connection logs, which help to track foreign targets. The formal legal process required in Britain to seek personal materials such as emails, photos, and videos from an internet company based out of the country is being circumvented. It was agreed that they would minimize the amount of personal data being taken from people without a warrant and that people should know when their information is being used. Apple, for example, believes the customers have a right to know how their private information

FACTS: The defendant, Peter Junger, a computer law professor at Case Western Reserve University challenged the United States government's regulations of encryption software. The regulations in place prevented U.S. citizens from being able to export encryption source code (or publishing/disseminating) over the internet. Junger was concerned that international students might not be able to join his encryption technology class that he taught and that any encrypting software he creates and wants to post on his

Stempel (2017) goes on to quote a statement from Judge Koh’s 93-page decision, “All plaintiffs have alleged a risk of future identity theft, in addition to loss of value of their personal identification information.” John Yanchunis, a lawyer for many plaintiffs who already had earlier claims against Yahoo dismissed, felt that the consumers gained a significant victory with Judge Koh’s ruling (Stempel, 2017). All in all, between the three known data breaches, which some believe is the biggest in history, over 1.5 billion users were

Although this case seems unique in matter the government has a history of invading the privacy of American companies and citizens. In 2013, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a brief

We’ve have lost most of our privacy rights. Company’s track social media. Everything is recorded. We can now go online and search a person’s name you can find their address, phone number, age, and family members name. This isn’t privacy.

As a mass media corporation, AOL is always focused on providing the customers with network services which are convenient and easy to use, and this is exactly what Stephen Case looking for, who was the founder of AOL. In 1990s, AOL has already took steps in online market and gained huge profits, they put lots of advertisement online while not so many companies noticed the great potency of internet, they cooperated with Amazon and Barnes

The start of various search engines and the use of data mining created a ability for data about individuals to be collected and combined from a wide variety of sources very easily. The FTC has provided a set of guidelines that characterize widely recognized concepts concerning fair information practices in an electronic marketplace called the Fair personal information Practice Principles. In order not to provide away too greatly personal information, e-mails should be encrypted and browsing of webpages as well as further online actions should be through trace-less via anonymizers in cases those are not trusted, by open source dispersed anomymizers, so called mix nets, such as I2P or Tor - The Onion Router. Email isn't the only internet use