Case Study On Parole Transition

Inmates that have been incarcerated for long periods of time, have a hard time adjusting to parole because of several different reasons. To be locked up for extended periods of time, they are used to being told what to do, when to do it, having things done for them, and things given to them. Because they haven’t had to make any of their own decisions or work for anything. Also coming back into the community is hard to a newly released felon. That label of being a felon, doesn’t give them many job options if any. I have noticed that they are stuck in the time that they were arrested in, technology has passed most of them by.

The world we live is constantly changing whether we are on the streets or in the prison system.

The IDOC Parole Program addresses public safety and enhances parole supervision on the streets through increased monitoring and provides assists to services, which reduce recidivism. All parolees receive direct supervision in the community. The Parole Division has increased its parole agent numbers and contact with parolees as they return to the community, as well as has case management programs and specialized parole surveillance units (Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) Website). Yet, this more like policing and not services-oriented.

Federal probation was put in place to suspend a current sentence of an inmate and place them under the supervision on a qualified agency for a period of time to either free up the jail from nonviolent offenders or to try rehabilitate the offender from any future criminal acts. The development of the federal probation system began in 1925 when a bill was passed and signed by President Coolidge (Alarid, 2015). Before then, federal probation was rejected as an idea many times because it was introduced during the Prohibition Era. The National Probation Act that supported federal probation was put into effect, but it wasn’t until the mid-1900 that the federal probation law was fully working and overwhelmed as well. Since the work load got to intense

Today there are several options a judge can grant an offender in regards to the punishment they shall fulfill before or after trial. This refers to any way ranging to non imprisonment yet supervised ways used to deal with criminal offenders who are facing conviction or who has been convicted.. There are punishment an offender may receive such as fines, community service, electronic surveillance also know as house arrest, shock probation, intensive supervision, residential community supervision etc. The most common punishment used by the justice system is probation as well as parole. Probation is the release of an offender from detention , subject to a period of good behavior under supervision. An individual may be granted probation as an

Probation and parole are both alternatives to incarceration. People on probation serve their sentence in the community under supervision instead of any incarceration. People put on parole have been incarcerated and is serving their remaining time in the community under supervision of a parole officer. (Michael Carlie) The reason for parole is to transition prisoners back into society. If a person is a threat to the society, then they will keep them incarcerated until their time is over instead of parole.

Secondly, the state should increase the liability and clarity of parole boards. As to provide effectiveness of grant conditional discharge for older inmates mentions above, the states should improve the liability and clarity of parole boards judgment. American Civil Liberties Union (2012) stated that parole boards seldom apply age-based parole programs on the books where it can be found in the states. Hence, states should necessarily ask parole boards to justify their decisions in the form of writing, disclose parole opportunity to present views to the social, and perhaps construct an appeals operations or right to justification lawyers during hearings as well as establish parole guideline to the parole boards (Penal Reform International, 2015).

Bohn & Hanley (2011) expresses a clear dramatic increase in the number of people incarcerated in the United States since the early 1970’s, mostly because of drugs (pg. 365). Another notable fact reveals the increase of confinement is the rising charge in price per day to house prisoners; as well, keep jails and prison overcrowded to make more profit (Bohn & Hanley, 2011, pg.369). Although efforts to provide alternatives methods to long-term incarceration exists, the fact still remains that private sectors that own prisons and jails still depend on a high rate of imprisonment (Bohm & Hanley, 2011, pg. 370). Noticeably, the strategic approach taken is to build larger facilities to house more offenders, make more profit from their crimes and

One of today's most hotly debated topics in the criminal justice field is whether or not individual states should abandon the parole system. Many people feel it is time to do away with parole, while others are fighting for its survival. As with any controversial change, there are pros and cons to both sides of the argument, all of which are very convincing. The basic arguments for and against the abolition of the parole system at the state level can be easily defined.

Probation and parole are an important part of the criminal justice process, and both are

In 1985, The Community Corrections Program was created by law. It allowed sentencing of non-violent felony offenders to community-based alternatives to imprisonment in order to reserve confinement for violent offenders in the state of Tennessee. The goal of the program was to reduce the probability of continued criminal behavior while maintaining the safety of the community. The Community Corrections Program allowed taxpayers dollars to be diverted from the high costs of confinement for non-violent offenders. The state contracted with local governments and qualified private agencies to develop a range of front-end community-based supervision and resource services for eligible offenders.

In Units 1-4 of this class, we discussed the supervision of individuals on probation and parole, as well as, the roles of probation and parole officers. Probation is a form of sentencing for a criminal offense (Alarid & Del Carmen, 2012). Probation mandates the convicted individual to remain in the community under red in lieu of serving time in jail or prison (Alarid & Del Carmen, 2012). Probationers are required to adhere to the conditions outlined in the probation (Alarid & Del Carmen, 2012). Parole is the release of an inmate back to the community under supervision, after he or she has completed a portion of his or her prison sentence (Alarid & Del Carmen, 2012).

The assigned video showed the everyday work that goes into probation and parole. It's not just a check in check out system, officers must away to help transition their supervisey into a non criminal environment and lifestyle. It's not a desk work job, it's a type of job where you sometimes have go out and find the offenders which can sometimes have your life at risk. While to some this may seem dangerous but this is nessasrry for those who work in probation and parole, because if you remain in a office the entire time you do not really know the progress of the offender.The first step to this process is for the officer to find housing for the individuals to make sure they are in a stable living environment . Without proper house the offender can end up

The typical parole practices that are used in today’s correctional system are supervision and rules for releases. When it comes down to it according to provisions of a statute (mandatory release/mandatory parole), there are many types of post-custody conditional supervision, or in other words the result of a sentence to a term of supervised release. (“Bureau of justice statistics (BJS) - community corrections (probation and parole),” 2016) “In the federal system, a term of supervised release is a sentence to a fixed period of supervision in the community that follows a sentence to a period of incarceration in federal prison, both of which are ordered at the time of

John Augustus were known as “Father of Probation." He released an adult drunkard into his custody rather than sending him to prison. Later on, he convinced the court to release more offenders to his supervision including children who had been accused of stealing. By 1846, about thirty children were under his supervision, and eleven hundred persons were bailed both male and female by Augustus (American Probation and Parole Association).