Case Study: Petitioner V.

Satisfactory Essays
In the instant case, Petitioner has frustrated the policy of the law and has not made good faith attempts to resolve this matter without court intervention. Petitioner has had over a month to schedule the reunification therapy appointment with Dr. Murphy while Respondent has had no visitation with the parties’ minor children since June 2016 pending said arrangements to be made. Petitioner’s delay tactics are evident in the fact that she waited until August 8, 2016 to make arrangements with Dr. Murphy as a result of Respondent filing Ex Parte in the matter that day. She did this knowing that Respondent wouldn’t be able to visit their minor children until then. On the other hand, Respondent has incurred needless attorney’s fees in addressing
Get Access