Case Study Plane Wreck: Airline Indusrty

The airline industry is an extremely competitive industry and is also a highly seasonal industry. Profit can be drastically affected by fluctuations in energy prices or economic downturns (Maverick, 2015). Key financial metrics utilized by analysts in the airline industry include the quick ratio, the return on assets ratio and the debt capitalization ratio, which was already covered earlier (Maverick, 2015).

The main reason for the low-cost subsidiaries’ failure is the airlines’ corporate strategy. By launching a LCC as a unit inside the same corporate structure (e.g., single scheduling and pricing centre for United Airlines’ and Shuttle’s low–cost flights), traditional airlines limited the LCC’s flexibility and independence. By building a low-cost carrier on top of a traditional carrier cost-structure, the parent company was also tempted to think low-cost when setting ticket prices, but not trying (or being able) to reduce traditionally high costs: the airline had now two unsustainable business models instead of one!

And the main point of its cost structure is to manage cost-cut in order to get higher profit. For airline companies, low pricing may build brand loyalty. And efficient operations can help the company maintain competition out by being the low cost provider. If the company is able to provide the same quality service to its customers but sell it for less, this may give them a competitive advantage over other companies in the same industry. In addition, being the low cost provider can be a significant barrier to entry. Basically, a company which has the ability to increase prices without losing market share is said to have pricing power. And South Airlines has this kind of power. Actually, it has earned the dominant position in airline market by taking advantage of high barriers. Above all, Southwest Airline’s cost structure can provide the company a visible competitive

Private jet crash that killed four members of Osama Bin Laden's family crashed while attempting to land at Blackbushe Airport

Market structure can be defined as patterns of behaviour by enterprises in an effort to adjust to the markets in which they operate (buy or sell). Pricing strategies and collusive behaviour mergers are a few dimensions of market conduct. It is the industry norm for a legacy carrier to offer service to most popular destinations; Delta reducing routes to a similar schedule as the low-cost airlines is not an option in the multi-billion dollar industry. In order to gain market share from low-cost airlines, Delta must create a value proposition that differentiates itself from its competitors. Many customers will pay a premium if the level of service provided is higher than the low-cost, no-frills

1. There are a few trends in the US airline industry. One is consolidation, wherein existing players merge in an attempt to lower their costs and generate operating synergies. The most recent major merger was the United Continental merger, which is still an ongoing affair, but has created the largest airline in the United States by market share (Martin, 2012). Another trend is towards low-cost carriers. In the US, Southwest has been a long-running success and JetBlue a strong new competitor, but in other countries this business model has proven exceptionally successful. The third major trend is the upward trend in jet fuel prices, and the increasing importance that this puts on hedging fuel prices and capacity management (Hinton, 2011).

When they didn’t, the airline retaliated by offering deep cuts in fares on several routes flown by its competitors. Northwest airline responded with a $198 round-trip fares with connections on routes for which American airline’s average fare was $1,600. American’s response was to offer $99 one way fairs in 10 markets flown by each of the other competitors except that of Continental Airlines which had followed and matched the leader’s (American Airline) original changes in all markets. With respect to the concept of strategic behavior exhibited by firms in an oligopolistic setting, some firms may try to achieve a dominant strategy that yields them better results and do not flip-flop, no matter what strategies other industry participant follow. This was illustrated in the case, when, in 2004, Continental Airlines raised its fares to mitigate rising cost of aviation fuel. Firms in an oligopoly may differ in terms of their cost structure and the airline industry is no exception and participants do exhibit strategies that enable them not to follow price increases driven by aviation fuel cost.

As the nature of the good is a seat on a plane, clearly capacity constraints are present in the form of the limited seating on aircraft, as well as the inability to in the short run increase output beyond full capacity. During the setting of price, clear communication will most likely result in a non-static equilibrium. As well as this, the symmetry in terms of the market and cost structures has played a part in creating a successful cartel. Each firm produces a relatively homogenous good in terms of economy, business or first class, with a limited amount of features it can differentiate itself from its competitors. As well as this, using Figure 1, which will be discussed later on, demonstrates that the main costs to an airline are those which cannot be easily reduced or offset, most notably the cost of fuel and aircraft maintenance. Therefore both firms have near perfect knowledge of the cost structure and revenue through observing prices, and will aid in choosing a certain pricing strategy.

The internet results in less fragmented pricing information and the ability to compare prices across multiple carriers. Airlines now offer promotions and extra services to attract buyers and therefore customers have an abundance of choice. As significant buyer power exists, industry returns can accrue to buyers through lower prices and discounts.

Since the merger of U.S. Airways and American Airlines, most people would now agree we are living in the age of airline oligopoly. Oligopolies form when there’s a state of restricted competition, and new companies cannot break into the industry for reasons like high-entry costs or government restrictions. This is the condition of the airline industry, today. In order to breach the oligopolistic nature of the airline industry, airlines must be able to break through high barriers to entry such as: retaining substantial capital requirements, having the need for technical and technological ingenuity and jurisdiction of patent rights. In addition, airplanes must be purchased, employees must be trained and facilities must be procured. Even after all these expenditures, some airlines still experience substantial financial losses. As a result, most of these airlines experiencing a financial hardship are subject to an airline merger. For this reason, the major airlines in the United States now consist of four competing large carriers: American Airlines, Delta Airlines, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines. These companies have survived the deregulation of the airline industry and sustained their places at the top of the industry. In an effort to stand out in an oligopolistic industry, airlines must experience: economy of scale, growth through merger, mutual dependence and price rigidity and non-price competition.

Airlines must operate within a low-margin, high-fixed-cost environment, making profitability particularly sensitive to decreases in volume, either from environmental factors (e.g., the September 11,2001 attacks) or from competition. Moreover, the airline business is labor-intensive. Labor costs as a percentage of revenues ranges from a low of about 25 percent for the low-fare airlines to almost 50

Airlines use a formula of combining their yield and inventory costs to determine ticket prices. While it is imperative to focus on the idea of being profitable, the focus is to maximize the cost of the flight revenue. One huge factor that encourages an increase in the cost of tickets relates to a customer ordering a ticket close to the departing date, define this as a risk factor because they need to make up for all unsold seats. A high percentage of the revenue is dedicated to overhead costs such as fuel and labor. When a ticket price is higher with one airline than the other, the customer interprets this as being an excessive cost. The demand is greatly affected by the external market

Having conducted research on Porter’s Five Forces Model and the current business climate of the airline industry, I will be analyzing the industry using the Five Forces Model. Porter’s Five Forces model is a highly recognized framework for the analysis of business strategy. Five forces are derived from the model that attempts to determine the competitive intensity, competitive environment and overall attractiveness of an industry. The framework is based on five forces that describes the attributes of an attractive industry and suggests when opportunities will be the greatest and threats the least within an industry. The five forces include

In this paper I will be analyzing the airline industry using Porter’s Five Forces. Porter’s Five Forces is a business management tool that allows firms to possess a clearer perception of the forces that shape the competitive environment of an industry, and to better understand what these forces indicate about profitability with regard to the microenvironment. The forces include Competitors, Threat of Entry, Substitutes, Suppliers, and Customers. When firms are able to widen their conception of competition beyond their direct competitors, and consider the broader economic fundamentals of their industry, they are able to form better strategy to better optimize their profitability. The airline industry is one characterized by low

Powerful customer-the flip side of powerful suppliers-can capture more value by forcing down prices, demanding better quality or more service, and generally playing industry participants off against one another at the expense of industry profitability. Buyers are powerful if they have negotiating leverage relative to industry participants, especially if they are price sensitive, using their clout primarily to pressure price reduction. The bargaining power of the buyers is very high as now a day’s tickets can be booked online and if they can go for the cheapest fares and there is not much cost involved in it.