Case Study Poddar

The nurse that originally noticed the shortage in anesthesia, in my opinion should have filed a formal compliant against the chief of anesthesia for not executing an investigation due to her speculation and evidence. If it was determined to be true that Dr. Johnson illegally using the anesthesia than he could have gotten some help. His illness could be in final stages not because he neglected to receive treatment. Instead of covering up the pain there is a possibility that he could have received treatments to help him through his illness. I think the employees of this hospital are at fault along with Dr. Johnson because they did not practice integrity and inform anyone of the incidents that they were noticing. Everyone gave excuses and the one that did say something should have complaint to someone who would have listened. A hospital mission is to care for their patients and the mission was not followed by any one who noticed Dr. Johnson’s actions.

Regents case has been an ongoing controversial debate for many therapists, as this began the start of the duty to warn, duty to protect. Prosenjit Poddar was a graduate of the University of California. He developed a strong infatuation with a woman he met at dance class named Tatiana Tarasoff. They briefly dated, but Tarasoff called it quits as she wanted to continue to pursue other men. Poddar was still very much in love with Tarasoff, and fell into a deep depression, and began stalking Tarasoff. Poddar found a therapist at Berkley’s Cowell Memorial Hospital by the name of Lawrence Moore. In his last therapy session with Dr. Moore, he disclosed how he intended to kill his ex Tatiana Tarasoff. Dr. Moore had diagnosed Poddar with acute paranoid schizophrenic reaction and called campus police proposing that Poddar is brought to a psychiatric hospital for observation. The police brought in Poddar for questioning but was later released when he stated he would stay clear of Tarasoff. Dr. Moore was ordered by his supervisor not to request any further actions from the police for Poddar. Neither Dr. Moore nor any other doctors associated in examining Poddar warned Tarasoff or her family members about the threats made towards

Is There Any Way That the Therapist’s Handling of the Case is Justifiable Under the ACA Code?

Based on the information provided, Oliver’s allegations were not supported with documentation, but merely opinion and hearsay. In Oliver’s affidavit, she stated that she “read” in the discharge summary that Dr. Brock was consulted and assisted with treatment. Although the supporting documentation of the previous statement is important, the more pressing issue becomes whether a doctor-patient relationship was formed in order to support the allegations.

The event that essentially precipitated the criminal charges against Ann Mitchell and Vicki Galle was when they reported the unsafe medical practices of Dr. Ronaldo Arafiles. They stood up for many of Dr. Rolando Arafiles patients and their rights. They felt as if Dr. Arafiles was not providing standard care for his patients. After they filed an anonymous complaint to the Texas Medical Board (TMB), Winkler County Sherrif Robert Roberts requested copies of the confidential complaints and notified Dr. Arafiles. Following this action, the sheriff and Dr. Arafiles a attempted to retaliate against the two nurses (Sack, K). After reviewing the outcome of the case, the nurses were both impacted negatively. They will probably never be hired into the

On March 23, 2017 at 1402hrs, Doctor from Mental Health notified Police Service of a Health Welfare. At 1410hrs, VA police notified the Austin Police Department (APD) and spoke with a dispatcher – 7974 and requested a Health and welfare at 2407 S. 4th street (Green Doors Halfway House) for a possible suicidal Veteran. APD Dispatcher stated he had officer’s en-route to the above address and provided me the incident #170821057.

That's when she faced a difficult ethical decision: She could order the shirts from a low-cost company in China or she could order them from a fair-trade company in San Francisco, which provided safe conditions and higher wages for the workers who made the clothing. The fair trade shirts were $28.65,making the grand total for her project $8,595. In contrast, the Chinese T-shirts were $5.50 each, and the company's Web site promised fast and free delivery for a grand total of $1,100.

A: tutors childern at neighborhood house, student intern with YMCA metro center, link crew student mentor, vice president of junior state of america club, and peer leader for Girls first

The meeting began with the chairman recounting the claims against the psychologist, the rules for identifying the complainant, and that the focus of this meeting was to determine if the potential that legal or ethical violations had occurred. All board members were in possession of copies of the information that was available at the time. The complainant was referred to by the initials R. G. for the purpose of maintaining confidentiality during the open meeting. All R. G.’s interactions were conducted by conference call with the board members.

Discuss the four components of corporate social responsibility and how they relate to a charitable campaign such as (Product) RED. How does participation in a cause-marketing event contribute to a company's social responsibility? What role does sustainability play?

On the campus of the University of California, Tatiana Tarasoff was killed by Prosenjit Poddar just two months after being detained by campus police for making such threats in a counseling session. According to Public Health Law, Poddar expressed that he was going to carry out the action of murder during two different counseling sessions, which his psychologist, Dr. Moore, had no choice but to have him detained. He was released after promising to stay away from Tarasoff, however, he followed through on killing Tatiana Tarasoff. During this time frame, according to the “Facts” from a casebriefs.com (page 2), the psychologist sought out other professionals for insight. The reason for consensualizing was to get others’ insight as to whether is was the psychologists place to warn Tatiana Tarasoff or her parents of this threat, and break confidentiality with her client. The conclusion drawn was to not warn, which was advised by Moore’s superior, or protect Tatiana, and as a result, she was murdered by Poddar in 1969.

Therapists get legally allowed to warn others of potential dangers. This article should expound on how this can be done, and when the need should be identified by clinician. An ethical decision has to be made by an individual when they decide to exercise their duty to warn. Duty to warn allows the counselors, and psychological therapists to breach confidentiality when a person endangers life of another. The clinical therapists cannot be prosecuted for warning a third party of imminent danger or if they unreasonably suspect the patient might harm themselves. Initially, the therapist had no right to disclose the content of their discussions to another party until Tarasoff got killed.

It is troubling that other clinicians allowed her to continue to practice when her competency was questionable. The clinician is putting the clients at risk and not taking time to care for herself. My concern is that she is using client sessions to vent about her own personal problems. Currently, she has poor judgment and may refuse to refer clients out, which would be reported before things worsen. This situation can intensity her mental state if the board rules against her and considers her incompetent.

Because of the doctors’ profession, a psychiatrist must abide by the ethic of nonmaleficence when it comes to their patients. This article is true, “When conflicts occur among psychologists’ obligations or concerns, they attempt to resolve these conflicts in a responsible fashion that avoids or minimizes harm” (Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, n.d.). For this profession, this is very important because their judgment can have a serious effect on a person mind. If there were no ethics to guide them not to do no harm, psychology could become an unethical profession within the health care system. This ethic could also be the reason for the raise of concern that Dr. McHale has for the detainee.

Tale servizio, offerto da Tyring, prevede la sostituzione del battistrada consumato con del materiale nuovo,