A company called PolyMet wants to build a copper-nickel mine in Northern Minnesota. It would infringe on Superior National Forest, where many species and geographical elements would be disrupted. PolyMet plans on mining for 20 years, and afterwards will do its best to repair and return the land to its original state. There are numerous debates and arguments over whether they should be allowed to mine on the land. The state owns the land, but the company owns its mineral rights. (BC Hydro, 2013, p. X) This causes conflict with many different groups and clashes between what is more important: economic opportunities or the effects on the population. My opinion is that the dangerous effects far outweigh the gain. One enormous drawback is that
In addition to environmental concerns, opponents argue that government regulation is too lax and as Bahr states, “It is all too easy to mine on public lands and the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management have made it extremely easy to validate claims.” Although uranium miners recognize federal obligations to reclaim operation sites Roger Clark, Grand Canyon Program
What some people may be worried about is the fact that this mine could destroy the wonderful peace of the Boundary Waters, for at least 20 years while PolyMet does their mining. The Boundary Waters are located in one of the 12 places on Earth where you can go 15 minutes without hearing human noise. You can ask pretty much anyone who has been to the Boundary Waters, and they will tell you just how peaceful and serene it is. I honestly think 20 years worth of jobs in that area cannot match up to the amazing environment that is already there.
Alaska should not allow the Pebble Partnership to build the Pebble Creek mine in Southwest Alaska. The benefits of the mine are nothing compared to what would happen to the environment if the mine were to be built. First off, the people in this region make their living off of the salmon who live in the rivers. If the mine were to be built, those rivers would become polluted and all of the salmon would die, meaning that everyone there would have to find a new way to survive. Not only would the rivers and water sources be polluted, but the environment in general. The mine would generate about ten billion tons of waste. This would then go onto pollute the air, kill many of the plants, and harm the animals in the region. While the Pebble Partnership
Copper is a common material used in our daily lives. We use it for electrical generators and electrical wiring. It is used in our phones and other technology. With the increase in demand for technology, the need for copper for those products has also increased. Twin Metals is a Minnesota mining company that wants to open an underground copper mine near the boundary waters. The Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) is a Minnesota preserve in the Superior National Forest that has hiking trails and lakes for canoeing. They do not allow motorised vehicles on the preserve. The question I’m investigating is “Can Twin Metals open and safely operate a copper mine near the BWCAW?”
PolyMet is planning on mining for copper, nickel, and cobalt in northeast Minnesota. PolyMet will be mining in an area of 6,650 acres which they will be exchanging with The Forest Service for 6,690 acres of PolyMet’s land. There mining operation will go on for 20 years and will process 225 million tons of ore. The project will employ 360 people directly and around 600 people indirectly, and will have an estimated earnings of $515 million annually. Ones they have the correct permits it will take 18-24 months.
Recently, a contractor working for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unintentionally released 3 million gallons of toxic mine waste into the Animas River in the Mountain West state of Colorado. Today, people in the US are debating the efficacy of the EPA (the right-wing is using the spill as anti-government propaganda) and the toxic aftermath the spill will undoubtedly have on local economies, communities and ecosystems. So far, the spill has "contaminated the Animas River, San Juan River, and the Colorado River in Utah."
PolyMet is the first of a long list of companies that hope to take advantage of the world’s largest untouched deposit of copper located beneath northeast Minnesota near Hoyt Lakes. The company is hopping to divulge 600 million dollars to operate an old mine in that area. The company has held multiple town meeting in hopes to sway the public into agreeing with the construction of the mine. Though this operation will create a lot of jobs (over 400 permanent jobs and thousands of temporary ones) it should immediately be halted due to not only environmental concerns but also ethics and moral concerns. This project should be halted because it has a sustained life span of two decades, PolyMet is backed by a questionable company, and
As humans we rely on the resources around us because we do not have fur coats to protect us from weather, or fast speed to keep us safe from predators. The resources we need have to be mined, and thus the PolyMet mine debate is born. The PolyMet mine is a great idea, and we should follow through with it.
Identify one of the parties involved in the issues of coal mining and explain that party’s interest in the issue. One of the biggest industries described in the movie is Massey Energy. This is a large coal mining industry that is mining the Appalachia Mountains. They do not believe they are doing any harm. The workers truly think that they are putting the mountains back to how they left them. To the CEO and president of the company though, they know what they’re doing isn’t right. However, money seems to be more important to them than the lives of the
Mountain Top removal mining (MTM), is decimating some of the last pristine environments left in our country, and it needs to stop. The devastation left in the wake of mans’ pursuit to satisfy his insatiable greed for energy, is nothing shy of a brutal crime scene. I feel, like many others, it has got to be stopped, and replaced with a more sensible, and appropriate, appetite for energy. The severe health, and environmental risks are abundant, yet we continue to mask this atrocity behind statistics, and well-orchestrated advertising. As noted by RP Siegel of Triple Pundit Magazine (April 2012), “Coal contains the most CO2 per BTU, the largest contributor to global warming.” Obviously, this should be enough to convince the average, sensible individual that there is no more tolerance for continued MTM practices. However, big mining companies continue to destroy delicate ecosystems, rural family lands, and cause irreversible damage to the geological infrastructure of the land.
Mining companies haven’t improved the conditions of these communities rather, they’ve mistreated and abused their power. Something’s that attribute to mining is displacement of communities, poor work conditions, mining induces violence and conflict. Therefore, turning a blind to these issues is an easy way to disregard the fact that Canadian policies are false and
Although the extremist may not be the voice of the masses, they are definitely the loudest voices. These voices usually point their hate speech and angry protests at something called “forced pooling”. They take stabs at the idea, saying it's the private version of “Public Domain”; that it's destroying our environment by destroying the local ecosystem, but have very little evidence to back their outlandish claims and the evidence they do show is very circumstantial or a result of scares, random accidents. These groups are willfully ignorant to the benefits of forced pooling and how it actually protects the land/mineral rights of citizens instead of taking it. To explain forced pooling and its benefits we must first understand the concept of mineral rights versus surface rights, as well as what a mineral lease consists
Polyface is an economically and sustainable family-owned farm evolved during the transition from a stereotypical polyculture configuration to less labor-intensive single output farms. Started in the year 1961, it was formally taken over by Salatin in the year 1982. It has a 550-acre property (100 acres of pasture and 450 acres of woodland) in Virginia. There were 6 full-time employees with the farm:
Sarah is a kind girl, she gets good grades and is what society would think as quite pretty. However, on a daily basis, she is harassed from the time that she wakes up, until the time that she goes to sleep in tears. She has attempted to talk to other adults such as the teachers at the school. Sadly, the bully only got off a warning and Sarah was still tormented day in and day out. This short example shows that schools need to shine more light on the subject of bullying. Schools have “attempted” to take on this idea of bullying by plastering posters one walls along with counselors that try their hardest to help. Nevertheless, this cannot be enough to stop bullying at schools, can it? With the
In our days, mining for resources is inevitable. The resources we need are valuable in everyday life. Such resources mined up are coal, copper, gold, silver, and sand. However, mining poses environmental risks that can degrade the quality of soil and water, which can end up effecting us humans if not taken care of and many of the damages are irreversible once they have occurred.