Case Study: Riss V. New York

Rinaker vs Superior Court case is a juvenile delinquency proceeding minors, Christopher G. and Huy D, are charged with committing vandalism. Minors were allegedly convicted with throwing rocks at Arsenio Torres’s car. Torres later brought a civil harassment case against the minors, which began the process of mediation in an effort to resolve the civil harassment action.

Parties: Parminder Kaur & Amanjit Kaur (Petitioners) v. New York State Urban Development Corporation (Respondent)

Introduction Of Case: New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) is a court case heard and ruled on by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case dealt with the constitutionality of the search of a public school student after she had gotten caught smoking in a public school bathroom. The search provided evidence of drug paraphernalia, marijuana, and the intent of sale of drugs. The student fought the charges, stating that the search violated her Fourth Amendment rights. The United States Supreme Court ruled 6-3, that the search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Title: Ginsburg v. City of Ithaca and Cornell University et al., 839 F. Supp. 2d. 537 (N.D.N.Y. 2012).

It is the government’s ordained and foremost right to provide its citizens with reliable protection and security, especially in the face of an emergency. However, the government’s failure to provide equitable care, causing damage, injury, or death, results in legal negligence, or a person not acting to their given standard resulting in damage. In the case of Riss v. The City of New York, Linda Riss experienced negligent conduct from the New York City police department when, after she was repeatedly threatened by a rejected suitor, they did nothing to protect her until after she was mutilated with acid. With protection and ongoing investigation, Riss would have been kept safe under the responsibility that the police failed to adhere to.

Issue: Do warrantless arrest and no probable cause determination allow for Police to detain a suspect for an extended amount of time?

The sixth and fourteenth amendment both protect rights having to do with due process and right to counsel.

MILLERSBURG — After serving eight months in prison for going into and stealing money from a Washington Township home last September, a former Wooster man last week was granted early release.

In the case State v. Ellis, Central State University RA discovered marijuana in the defendant’s dorm room while they were conducting an authorized, unannounced safety inspection. Campus police officers were then 19 notified and went to the room.While the campus police did not participate in the search, they were present in the room at the resident assistants’ invitation. The Ellis court concluded that the seizure of the marijuana was unconstitutional. It found that while the resident assistants’ search was authorized under the university’s policies and procedures, the later police entry into the room was unlawful because it was made without a warrant, consent, or exigent circumstances. This case would be beneficial to Deary Jones because it

Public order, as it relates to modern society, is an integral part of both law enforcement and community. In contrast to individual rights, public order is all that stands between crime and the public. In times, such as these, with fear and concern about

In the case of Sibron versus New York was an important case for the United States Constitution. Law enforcement officer, Anthony Martinez, observed Nelson Sibron for several hours, while talking to several narcotics addicts. Officer Anthony Martinez told Sibron that he is after one thing and then Sibron reach into his pocket, which he pulled out several heroin envelopes. Sibron was arrested and charged for drug trafficking. Sibron stated that his constitutional rights was violated, when he was stop and frisk search for no probable cause. The Criminal Court of New York City denied Sibron’s motion, but Sibron appealed to the court decision. The United States Supreme Court review Sibron’s case along with Peters versus New York. John Peters was

Whether the Fourth Amendment protects telephone conversations, which were done in a phone booth and secretly recorded, from introduce it as evidence against a person? It is important because many people use their phones in lots of places, and the privacy in American culture is something very important.

Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1978) The Court held that a defendant must prove there is a legitimate expectation of privacy for a search to be challenged.

The case of Gitlow v. New York was in 1925. The case had dealt with a lot of constitutional amendments which are the rights that are guaranteed to American citizens. Gitlow was a socialist and anarchist some people may say. The government viewed Gitlow as a threat because he believed that the government should be something they have never practices before. Gitlow was charged with violating anti anarchy laws because he was spreading anti government views in newspapers and magazines.

There are many challenges that law enforcement agencies faces when it comes to enforcing public safety at the same time protect the rights of individuals. This paper will focus on several key topics involving the relationship between public safety and individual rights. The first topic is the statutory authority and responsibilities of government officials, security personnel, and private citizens. The next topic involves the practices or laws relating to search, seizures, and surveillance by police, corrections, private citizens, and security personnel. This paper will also compare the laws relating to the use of