preview

Case Study: The Audit Senior

Decent Essays
Open Document

The audit senior has produced this report as a result of management restricting access to significant evidence, resulting in a lack of evidence to support the capitalization of research and development costs as an intangible asset. The audit senior is correct in identifying that limitation on scope has been imposed by management. The results of trials and tests of new drug would be a vital element of must audit work and without the results to demonstrate that the development costs will lead to future economic benefit, it is not possible to conclude that the accounting treatment is correct. However the imposed limitation has not been explained in audit report. A paragraph should have been included in the report which explains the matter giving rise to modification.
The terms used in basis of opinion paragraph are also fails to clear the situation as there is no reference to development cost , only the word intangible assets is used. Moreover the potential impact on financials has also not been quantified in the basis of opinion paragraph. The paragraph should state that the asset is recognized on the balance sheet at $4·4 million. …show more content…

It is clear from the information that the intangible asset is material to the balance sheet, representing 8% of total assets. So the audit opinion should at least be qualified with an ‘except for’ opinion. The reason behind giving disclaimer by audit senior can be the materiality of item in relation to Willis Ltd’s profit. If any adjustment was found regarding the writing off of development cost then Willis Ltd’s profit of $3.1 million would have changed to a loss of $1.3 million, so we can say that the item is extremely significant and is fundamental to the understanding of financial statements by the

Get Access