Case Study : The Market And Polis Models Of Policy

2028 Words Mar 22nd, 2016 9 Pages
Patrice Cummings
3/20/16
PAD 680 Midterm Part I

1. Deborah Stone compares the market and polis models of policy making with the intent to show that the original origin of the public policy discipline was to be grounded in a practical science, economics, but to also show how and why the economic approach to policy making has significant limitations. Stone is arguing against the view that policy decision making is rational decision making. Deborah Stone’s main reason for comparing the two models of policy making is to identify and critique the simplistic assumptions that have been used in the market and rationality project. Stone is attempting to point out the paradox that exists between the two because the two models are evidently contradictory, the market being ground in rationality and the polis being based on emotion. Stone compares the two policies in order to show that economics cannot be solely used to understand policy making because the two are fundamentally different. She also points out that policy is made in a political society and because of this the polis model seeks to explain public policy as it actually happens in reality since the field and study of public policy was created to allow government to make decisions that would best benefit their citizens. Stone argues that in the market model people and government look to capitalize on making the best decision that will benefit themselves given perfect or almost perfect information. The market model requires…

More about Case Study : The Market And Polis Models Of Policy

Open Document