Case Study: Theadores W. Ross

Gelnesidar Martinez submitted a complaint on August 26, 2015, regarding Ernest A. Solomon. Martinez alleges that during her divorce proceedings she gave Solomon $27,000 to buy out her husband’s half of the equity in their home. According to Martinez a deal was never reached and Solomon failed to return her money. Solomon has allegedly violated Mass.R.Prof.C. 8.4c.

Frank W.Tolman, Sr., submitted a complaint on October 25, 2014, regarding Alan L. Grenier, Esq. Tolman Sr. alleges that Grenier did not properly handle the sale of his property, 175 Central Street, Georgetown, MA. During the sale Tolman alleges that Grenier was deceitful, unethical, and fraudulent. Additionally, he asserts that he did not receive his entire case file, including properly executed paperwork required for taxes, and that Grenier “continued to run up legal bills and stalled me with no action.” Grenier has allegedly violated Mass.R.Prof.C. 1.1, 1.2, 1.4(a)&(b), 1.16(d), and 8.4(c).

Upon receipt of the vehicle, Mr. Meyer found the vehicle to have paint damages in several areas of the car, along with the hood being misaligned, the trunk unable to open, and the vehicle unable to crank. Mr. Meyer requested a full refund of the purchase price and when Mr. Alphin refused, he filed a claim in district court in Nebraska. Mr. Alphin was served notice to appear in court and he refused; therefore, the Nebraska court entered a default judgment for the amount of $8.942.30 against Mr. Alphin, defendant for Race City Classics, LLC. The amount awarded was for the necessary cost of repair alleged by Mr. Meyer, plaintiff. Mr. Meyer then filed a “Docketing of Foreign Judgment” and a “Notice of Filing for Judgment” in Iredell County Superior Court. This is the county and court in North Carolina where Race City Classics, LLC resides. Upon notification of the filings,

Whether the Claimant is the legal and equitable owner of the property despite the fact that

Cortés’s comments to King Charles V were so descriptive and impressive one can only assume that the Aztec State was very wealthy. He conveyed to the King how prosperous the Aztecs were from what he had witnessed. Cortes noticed the quality and quantity of the food, the variation of items sold in the markets, the magnificent architecture of the buildings and temples. He describes the enormous houses the noblemen live in and the great palaces build for Montezuma. He notices the education of the society with the manners they use similar to the citizens of Spain. He finally notes the organized economic system that has been established.

I plan to use the given information for my project by obtaining the information given to me to learn about John Ross and the outcomes that he had went through. I will focus on how the history of Chief John Ross has affected the United States today. Looking at the timeline through the important events of Ross, I will analyze the other events that was also happening during this point of time to see how maybe it affected him.

I have known Carmen A. Bethea for 19 years since the day she was born as a niece, creative thinker and a community volunteer. It is with great pleasure that I write this letter of recommendation.

Introduction Published in the twentieth century, William David Ross’ The Right and the Good is one of the most important contributions to moral philosophy of its time. Within the text, Ross outlines arguments for his definitions of ‘the right’ and ‘the good,’ as well as what things are right and what things are good. This paper will focus on chapter five of The Right and the Good, entitled “What Things Are Good?” I will give an account of what is written in chapter five, including arguments, objections, and replies. The purpose of this paper is not to agree with or oppose the points that Ross makes, but rather to explain his points and the objections and responses that are proposed.

The team met today with Carmen and her mother, Elizabeth, in their home. Carmen is a 15 year old, Hispanic female was recently arrested for prostitution and has a past drug possession charge. Elizabeth is concerned about Carmen’s well-being. She notes that her relationship with Carmen has deteriorated since Carmen started abusing drugs and prostituting herself for money. Elizabeth wants to mend her relationship with Carmen.

Your, Honor, this is Moore versus Moore, number 71,936, which is on your docket today for trial of the Community Property Partition pursuant to R.S. 9:2801. After extensive pre-trial conference and continuing ongoing negotiation between the parties, the parties have reached a compromise of this partition, which I will attempt to dictate into the record with Mr. Kitchens following me closely and ask the Court to approve it. Number one, we are going -- the parties are going to agree to divide the marital property, which is -- was accumulated during the matrimonial regime. The community of acquets and gains, existing between them, as follows: we are going to agree that Eddie Patrick Moore receives the two acres and improvements which currently

The Jesionski’s were refinancing their home on February 23, 2007 by borrowing $611M from Countrywide. Countrywide provided them with a Truth in Lending Act disclosure and a notice of a right to cancel which provided them until 12pm on February 27, 2007 to cancel. The Jesinoskis did not cancel and they use that money they received to pay off other debt. On February 23, 2010 the Jesinoskis tried to rescind the loan and attempted to argue that they did not receive a sufficient amount of copies of the TILA disclosure. Their attempt was denied by Countrywide. Countrywide sought a judgement and argued that the Jensionskis did not file their suit within the 3-year allowed period per TILA; The Jensionskis argued that they did. The District Court voted in favor of Countrywide; US Court of Appeals affirmed. (Jesionski,

The plaintiff, Charito Rapa Roz has hired an attorney in order to get her cut from the house she purchased with her ex-husband, Alaniz Abraham. Roz had filed for a divorce from her husband in early July of this year and now wants some entitlement of the house. There doesn’t seem to be post divorce tension between the two other than the fact Roz feels she is entitled to what she paid for the house. She had hired and a lawyer and decided to file a quiet trial to reach an agreement on amount August 8 of this

Awhile back we had a solution that Tom M. wanted to understand the cost for the SDS (Shooter detection system) program. We have quotes from SCI to do the install for the hardware and a quote for the cable pull. We are looking to get a quote for the remaining trades( carpenters , painters, etc). Let me know what other info you would need from me to get this

Facts: The plaintiff purchased an engagement ring given to the defendant as a proposal of marriage. The plaintiff broke off the engagement and asked for the ring back which the defendant refused to do. The district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff which the defendant appeals; affirmed.

A landowner may divide a parcel of land in any manner not inconsistent with the law is