Case Study on Legal Proceedings Essay

Within a courtroom, power relations are revealed at their greatest extent, in the instances of the interaction between the different courtroom actors. During the observation of a particular criminal case, it became clear to myself that the chain of power in a courtroom features the judge or magistrate at the top, followed by the lawyer (or defendant if they are representing themselves), with the witnesses and defendants at the bottom. This form of power distribution further exemplifies the ritualistic

On observing the District Court a number of distinctions from the Local Courts were immediately made apparent. Without going in to detail about the actual structure of the courts, they seemed to fit more closely with the traditional schema of a typical courtroom. In particular the larger courtrooms with more facilities combined with the barristers and magistrates wearing their wig and robes seemed to instantly uphold the ideology of justice. It is interesting to note how appearances can automatically provide an impression that justice will be upheld. The

In our modern-era of a technology based democracy, most if not all (people) are exposed to trials by jury’s in diverse forms of media. Less than often, we rarely give these legal inquiries a second thought but every so often there comes a trial that captures our attention and we become apprehended until a verdict is handed down. This sequence has been continued throughout centuries and regardless of the lack of media, in the past there were still specific trials that everybody spoke of. The treatment of the defendant by the courts has always been under scrutiny and either criticised for being too compassionate or too abrasive (?). It is rare as most prefer a skillful lawyer to defend them but it does happen that defendants do represent themselves

So for the first time in my life I set foot in a courtroom. Immediately I see a lady at a desk documenting papers next to the throne of which the judge sits in, followed by the opposing sides of the district prosecutor representing the “People”. On the opposing side of the courtroom there is the

On arrival at the courts, all personal belongings are put through a compulsory security screening. Security checks are undertaken to ensure the court remains a safe environment. The courtroom draws a clear layout that distinguishes the various roles of the courtroom through the conspicuous arrangements of the spaces. The courtroom itself is rather small, yet compact; the voices could be heard clearly with speakers attached across the room.

This essay will discuss the differences in the ‘real’ courtroom, versus the ‘fictional’ courtroom, which is the depiction most of us are exposed to. In order to accurately compare the differences between the two different courtrooms, a brief summary of each must be presented. Once each of these is portrayed, an attempt to compare and contrast the two styles and the differences that exist between them can be discussed.

The following assertion intends to provide an in-depth insight into my personal experience observing a trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria. This paper will outline a selection of many pressing issues noticed throughout my observation, more specifically those regarding the law and language in legal arenas along with symbolic and architectural traditions that reinforce prejudice towards those from a low socio-economic background and ethnic minority groups. Furthermore, it will argue how symbolism, architecture and practices within a court are in place to create a power dynamic and reinforce the courts British-'western' sovereignty and royal-like wealth which in turn intimidates members of the community especially from

The second educational need is the inclusion of social skills. Educators have the responsibility to provide a welcoming and safe environment, where children feel accepted and part of a group. Through social interactions children can share knowledge and develop confident self-identities (DEEWR, 2009). Educators should identify each student’s positive characteristics then use them to establish an understanding of interests to keep them engaged. This helps move towards an inclusive environment. An inclusive classroom should provide a safe, flexible learning environment where all students have sufficient

This debate group observed fictional court cases in hopes of fighting for what was right. Upon joining, I was overwhelmed with different views and people, all of whom were arguing for what they believed in. The enthralling atmosphere woke me up and it seemed as though I could finally be myself and express how I felt. I spent the nights studying past cases, trying to be the most effective witness possible for my trials’ side. The ten hours of practice a week eventually paid off and I was dubbed ‘Outstanding Witness’ at the District Competition. As the season came to a close I realized first hand that one must take action through expression in order to excel and make a difference in

When someone steps into the courtroom it requires that person to change how they act, to change how they present themselves, and to change who they are. When I stepped into the courtroom at the National Judicial Competition my whole world changed. However, it didn't happen all at once. The process began months before I arrived in Chicago. It started the day I accepted the invitation from the state office. That day the little boy inside of me began to fade.

As an individual who has never visited any form of court, I was extremely excited to witness our justice system in action for the purpose of this paper. Through the first amendment of the Constitution, the public has a constitutional right of access to criminal proceedings; yet knowing this, I was immensely repentant that as a criminal justice student in hopes of attaining a career in law enforcement have never previously stepped foot in any courthouse. It is paramount that an individual learns how the justice system of the United States is conducted, whether you have committed a crime or not. Attending a courthouse to witness an arraignment, or a criminal trial provides an individual with great insight in to our justice system, and allows us to interact with different members of the court such as, the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, court officers, and other court personal to further educate one’s self of how the court system comes together.

Judges play many important roles. They translate the law, evaluate the proof introduced, and control how hearings and trials unfurl in their courts. Most critical of all, judges are fair chiefs in the pursuit of justice. We have what is known as an as an adversarial system of justice, legitimate cases are challenges between contradicting sides, which guarantees that proof and lawful contentions will be completely and mightily exhibited. The judge, nonetheless, stays over the shred, giving an autonomous and fair-minded evaluation of the facts and how the law applies to those certainties. Judges wear black robes, and are addressed as “Your Honor” in the courtroom. When a judge makes a decision, somebody wins and somebody loses, and the ruling can quite important for large groups of people.

Norms control behavior by establishing standards of right and wrong. In the skier's group, the performance norm is hiding their original ideas and not open up for alternatives or open discussion. The skiers either worry the other team members may disagree with their ideas or they don’t want to upset the others, which causes low cohesiveness for the group of 16. Since they did not feel comfortable to speak up about how dangerous the situation is, no one has proposed to remake the decision even though they knew it is risky to taking the decision forward. They did not share information with other by saying “Hey, going skiing in a big group is really dangerous from my past experiences, why don’t we take a step back and remake the decision again? ”. Or “This is a sign of avalanche, to ski here is really risky, I think we should tell the other people and decide if we should go back. ” So the level of group productivity is low. The biggest problem for this informal group is, most of the group member known it is dangerous to go to skiing in a large group together, but Group Think prevents them to express their own views.

Mrs. Smith believes that her teenage daughter, Hannah, is having sexual intercourse with her boyfriend. She confronts Hannah, who admits that this is the case. Hannah explains that she is not using birth control because she thinks the chances are good that she will not get pregnant.

     A student on the dean’s list every semester, Carrie came into treatment because she felt she was simply not herself anymore. She used to remember times when she was happy. Recently, her boyfriend had just broken up with her. She was dating him for approximately ten months. The breakup came out of no where and she was not expecting it. At one point they had talked about taking a break, but it was brief and they both decided against it. However, she did mention that he was the reason she was here. He felt it was time for her to take control of her life again and be the person she was when she started seeing him. She admitted she knew she wasn’t the same either and when he said that she promised him to