Case Study – the Demise of Foreign Competitors in the Chinese Beer Industry

“The beer industry in the United States generates $75 Billion in annual sales.” (Abelli, 4)

     In this paper I will be talking about the U.S. beer industry and in short an overview of the brewing industry worldwide. I will talk about the barriers to entry, economies of scale, government intervention, pricing, current market trends, product differentiation, and imports. The focus being mainly on the U.S. brewing industry oligopoly. The U.S. brewing industry has three major players: Anheuser-Busch, SAB Miller, and Coors/Molson. Anheuser-Busch is currently the largest brewer in the world, producing over 100 million barrels a year. Anheuser-Busch currently owns over 50% of the market in the United States, with Miller trailing behind at 20% and Coors at about 11% with the rest of the market occupied by imports and craft breweries. When analyzing any industry, how easy it is for newcomers to enter the market is a great importance. If there are high barriers to entry

Success in the Chinese’ fruit beverage market is contingent upon distribution decisions made by firms in the market. Many companies have failed to prosper in this market due to poor distribution decisions. However, the Chinese fruit beverage market is attractive. The advantageous nature of this market is revealed by examining competitive rivalries, and the social, economic, and political forces that will affect your firm’s ability to successfully compete.

Such cross border deals have provided significant benefits to the brewing giants. This has given them ownership of local brands propelling them into dominant market positions around the world as global brands sell at significantly higher prices and the margins are much better as compared to the local beers.

distributors, brewers and retailers. A change suggested in Grolsch’s historic strategy is not to adapt the market completely in this case because it is an industry that gives importance to the country-of-origin. Markets Targeted: South Africa: Monopoly Market, No.1 SABMiller (Market Share: 98%) Brazil: Occupied by major Brewery Groups. China: Competitive Market. How to Compete: South Africa Brazil China Additional Line with SABMiller Co-Promotion with SABMiller

When entering the Canadian market, Guo faced multiple problems that halted the process. These problems included; high duties and taxes, non-Chinese Canadian consumers not knowing Yanjing’s products, and Canadian prices compared to the Chinese market prices. Although there are many present problems with selling this beer in Canada, immigrant entrepreneurs can avail services and are able to stay in the market. As long as one stays vigilant and was willing to take high risks, the success in importation of beer to Canada could be achieved.

One of the reasons for Heinekens success is due to their commitment in consistently scanning the environment and the market. Their continuous analysis of the external environment allows them to see where opportunities and threats lie, and where strategic strategies may be implemented to gain them a competitive advantage over competitors. The PESTLE model allows Heineken to analyse all areas of the external environment and determine which factors may influence their strategy.

iii. Import beer companies: These companies include Beck’s(Germany), Heineken (Holland) and Corona (Mexico). They control about 12% of the region’s market. However, these companies are seen to operate at disadvantage due to higher shipping costs, weaker distribution networks and an inability to control product freshness

Beer has a long history. In 2000 B.C.E., Sumerians had prepared eight different beer types, ranging from “strong,” “red brown,” and “good dark” (Mauk, 2013). Breweries have created their own recipes, brewed their own beers—some with alcohol, some without. Over the past few years, craft beer gained steady market share away from the national and international breweries (Murray & O 'Neill, 2012). Separating one beer from the next is the product itself, and what the product has to offer. Competition is ferocious due to more informed, sophisticated consumers, as well as globalization and the spread of technology (Murray & O 'Neill, 2012).

The situation can even explode for Export Brands International, as large beers conglomerates with tremendous power, are targeting the same segment and are creating similar beers. We have the real example of Anheuser-Busch new Bud Light Lime which was selling extremely well in the United States attacking Corona position and following the traces of the

The entrance of china was more opportunistic expansion rather than strategic. The huge population of 1.4 billion people and annual GDP growth of 14.5% over the past decade, China’s urban population rise from 36.2% of the total in 2000 to 46.6% in 2009, and the strong middle class whose per capital income surged from RMB 6,282 to RMB 17,175 (In 2010, RMB 1 = USD 0.15.) all made china as great opportunity for the restaurant that was facing a mature market that had a growth of merely 1%. Another attractive factor of china market was the success of many American restaurants such as KFC, McDonald’s and Pizza Hut’s. However

2》 Other beer brands have occupied large market capacity, market share of Carlsberg and Budweiser far exceeds that of Tsingtao beer

It is assumed that the logistics strategies outlined in this report would apply to any divisions in Tsingtao Brewery. As such, it is also assumed that other divisions run very similar supply chain management systems to that of South China Sales Company. The final assumption is that investment by the Tsingtao Group in the supply chain is a very manageable investment for them.

The report first delivers a background of market attractiveness and uncontrollable macro-economic factors relevant to market entry such as the political and economic climate, socio-cultural, legal, environmental and technological factors that may effect and influence the international marketing practices of the organisation in entering the Chinese Wine Market.

Despite the dominance of Carlsberg, in its annual report BGD could lay claim to being the largest Scandinavian beer exporter. This was because Carlsberg placed emphasis on licensing agreements or local production for its foreign markets, while BGD’s strategy was export led: ‘Eighty-three out of every hundred bottles of beer that we produce are sold in foreign markets.’ By 1995 the percentage of export sales by region of the world was as follows: western Europe 63 per cent, the Americas 10 per cent, eastern Europe 22 per cent, others 5 per cent. The development of BGD’s operations in some of these markets is now reviewed.