Castle Doctrine in Conjunction with Home Safety Essay

Another one of the big arguement that are used by the liberal side of gun control is that america's violent crime rate is too high and that more gun control restrictions would help bring it down.”In 2013, an estimated 1,163,146 violent

Looking at the nightly news, many would believe violent crimes are at an all-time high. There is no longer just one on one violent crimes or gang violent crimes. There are court shootings, school shootings, church shootings, theater shootings, mall shootings, workplace shootings, and others. Most one on one crime is committed with an illegal gun; whereas most mass shootings are done with handguns that are purchased legally. Although, violent crimes reported on the nightly news is hard to hear or see. It has become very common to encounter this information on a daily basis. The numbers seem to be overwhelming; statistics share violent crimes are at an all-time low. While the numbers of crimes are decreasing, gun ownership

Though each state that has enacted this law has its own interpretations and specifications, the Stand Your Ground Law generally permits the use of deadly force when a person feels a threat of death, serious bodily harm, rape, kidnapping, and robbery in most states, even if there is an option of retreat. The current Stand Your Ground Law, passed by legislation in 2005, applies to public settings; the Castle Doctrine is basically a Stand Your Ground Law that applies to the defense of oneself in a private abode or home. States currently enacting this law include Florida, Alabama, Michigan, Indiana, Nevada, Utah, and 17 others. Stand your ground law provides legal protection for protecting oneself and property at all costs and prevents civil lawsuits.

Other than a bodyguard or a law enforcement officer at one's side twenty-four hours a day, the most effective deterrent to criminal attack is the criminal's fear that the prospective victim is armed and prepared to defend themselves (Nisbet 14). Courts have ruled that there is no constitutional fight to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen, which means that police have no duty to protect the individual citizen (Long 55).

Most people would think that having a assault weapon will help protect their family. It will but it will cause even more problems because the person that killed the person breaking into you home that person will get in trouble because if he did not do anything first then it would not be self defense so that person will go to jail for murder.

unarmed residence. Having a firearm might not only scare a rapist or a home invader

The most common reason why people argue that they need to have a gun is for safety, so they can protect themselves against burglars. If a burglar would come into your house, you would have a better chance defending yourself and your family with a gun, than if you did not have a gun. The number of concealed weapon owners is at an all time high. In comparison the number of homicides had drastically decreased alongside the growing rate of legal concealed weapons. This number had been nearly cut in half in the past 20 years(Goldberg).

Criminals are provoked by self-protection and guns can thus be a disincentive. A majority of convicted American criminals have reported that they fear from attacking the victims who are armed. Their fear of encountering armed victims surpasses their fear of being caught by police (Lott, pp.05). Robbers do not attempt to break into houses after midnight because of the probability of being shot. Thus, society should be against gun control because crimes will decrease.

In recent years, the self-defense doctrine in several jurisdictions has been changing. Some jurisdictions have started using “stand your ground” laws, which change the traditional requirement that the person being attacked must “retreat to the wall” before using any kind of force. Proponents’ arguments include that the law merely codifies an individual’s deep-rooted right to defend oneself. Opponents’ arguments include that the law creates a “license to kill” and has negative racial implications.

What (or who) determines if a home invader lives or dies? In his essay “The Lines Are Blurry,” Kevin Michalowski discusses some of the basic challenges that one comes up against when involved in a personal defense situation. Because the laws concerning guns are so fuzzy, “nothing is set in stone.” Michalowski discusses the difference between “legal” and “right” in an effort to show his audience the issues in this area. He notes that the laws that are currently in place to punish violent criminals are the same laws that are being used against home defense cases. Although Michalowski has some good points, he wrongly asserts that all home defense shootings are necessary while at the same time downplaying

Since physical defense of U.S. citizens (especially those who seek to preserve individual liberty) is a key concern of the Bulwark Party, furthering restrictions on the current process of purchasing firearms is generally not supported by this party. If firearm access was to be hampered regarding American citizens in general, there is not guarantee that criminally ambitious will still seek ways to gather arms and wreak havoc among Americans while comparatively law-abiding citizens will be left with less effective means of defense. The

At the same time, weapons can protect from crime. Police are equipped with guns. The military uses rifles and explosives to “secure the blessings of liberty.” And yes, weapons can be used to defend one’s self in their own home. The castle doctrine, more commonly known as the “Make My Day” law, states that if someone is attacked on their property, they may use deadly force to defend themselves. There was a road rage case in Florida where castle doctrine was used. A couple was driving and got into a minor car accident. The passengers of the other vehicle started to beat the woman’s boyfriend, and she stabbed them both in self-defense. Some witnesses declared that if the woman had not acted, her boyfriend would have been killed.

The Castle Doctrine is a bill that was passed which lets you defend yourself with necessary force in your residence if someone is breaking into your home. Criminals like to go after easy targets such as, the elderly, disabled citizens, children, and people who are unarmed. Every citizen has the right to live free and happy, if they are attacked they should be able to defend themselves and their property without being charged as a murderer.

A recent news article came out with the title “Four arrested after armed home invasion in Vaughn”. Where the article talks about how four individuals entered a home armed.

Fear of crime, especially random violence perpetrated by young Americans, is among the nation's greatest concerns. It has served as the motivation for countless numbers of people to change their lifestyles, take self-defense classes, install home security systems, and carry handguns for protection. Moreover, fear of crime has influenced politicians and