preview

Catalytic Reaction Lab

Decent Essays

The purpose of this experiment was to observe combustion, oxidation-reaction, and catalyzed decomposition reactions as they work to create rockets that run on a fuel of the reaction H2+1/2O2→H2O2. Instead of being in partners, the partners were put into groups of 4 to create an experiment that tested rocket performance by manipulating a variable such as the order of the collection of gases or amounts of fuel. It was evident during the lab that the reaction of hydrochloric acid and mossy zinc [Zn (s) + 2 HCL (aq) → ZnCl2 (aq) + H2 (g)] reacted much faster than the reaction with the yeast and hydrogen peroxide [2H2O2 (aq) →catalyze 2H2O (l) + O2 (g)]. Both reaction continuously produced gas just at different rates. It can be inferred that the reactivity of the stoichiometric reaction was higher relative to the catalytic reaction. The stoichiometric reaction displaced the water in the pipette bulb with gas at a faster rate than the catalytic reaction did. When attempting to fill the pipette bulbs with gas, it was difficult to time the reaction exactly. That meant someone was holding the top of the pipette …show more content…

In table 1, as mentioned many times in this discussion, trial was absolutely an error trial. The trial had to be done twice because the piezoelectric spark generator was not working properly, another source of error. The gases collected could have been impure or diluted by air because of the long wait time when the spark generator was being fixed. The rocket in trial 1 in table 1 traveled the shortest distance from all the trials from table 1. From the lab, there was also confusion in the timing of the reaction of the gases. The reaction of yeast and hydrogen peroxide reacted slower than the reaction of hydrochloric acid and mossy zinc. The pipette bulbs might not have been watched properly during the first trial, resulting in an unequal ratio of oxygen and hydrogen, which would alter the

Get Access