Catherine Mackinnon / Thomas Pogge Essay

State Crimes are defined as “acts that are largely committed, instigated or condoned by governments and their officials” (International State Crime initiative). These crimes are considered to be very serious crimes in society today, due to the fact that they are either committed or condoned by governmental personnel with the aim of achieving certain goals. Having said that, scholars today do not have the knowledge of how important these crimes are since it violate international and criminal law within that state. Eugene McLaughlin identified four categories of state crime; Political crimes, crimes by security, economic crimes and social and cultural crimes. However, I will focus on the two that are more widely acknowledged Political crime is corruption and censorship, a state has the right to label a behaviour as political crime if it’s seen as a threat to the state. Crime by security has to do with genocide and torture, a great example of crime by security is the Rwanda Genocide that occurred in 1994 which ended up killing 800,000 citizens in just a few weeks. According to Grabosky and Stohl (2010), state crimes can be divided into six main types; State terror against another state, state terror against private interests, State facilitation of another state’s terrorism, state terror against its own citizens, state facilitation of private actors and political terror scale. In this essay, I will be mainly concentrating on the Rwanda Genocide, Libyan civil war of 2011 and

Catherine died of a stroke in November 1796 at the age of sixty-seven.The second Catherine lasted 34 years long. In the year of his death in 1796, the throne remained for his son, who hated her. Catherine's love affects the Russian treasure

Nevertheless, the government is the sole authority that can guarantee the protection of human rights and freedoms. It is responsible for putting in place the necessary laws and policies to protect and safeguard the rightful enjoyment of human rights among its citizens. In this case, the government, therefore, act as the custodians of human rights, and they are responsible for any acts that are committed against the enjoyment of a person’s freedom. Thus, the state is the guarantor and protector of human rights. However, at times the government itself may carry itself in an irresponsible manner by being the violators of human rights in occurrences such as genocides.

Security can be a tool to rationalize, legitimize, marginalize violence (keeping minority groups in their place) which could in turn reinforce systemic inequalities present in society by turning a blind eye to context. This dichotomy serves as a platform for other invalidation ideologies that works on the continuum of fear that can divide into categories of “us” and “them”, which are then used to send us messages about who is a threat, and leads to constructions of what individuals who are not able to stand up for themselves. The death of Ashley Smith illustrates how the range of oppressive structures were responsible for the persistent and severe denials of her fundamental rights. In this context, we can see that the state has both the means to violate and protect human rights.

Feminism, is a term that is widely misunderstood; some consider feminists as man haters, while others consider feminism as just another way for a woman to complain. Ultimately, feminism is a term that strives for equality for all. Margery Kempe, in The Book Of Margery Kempe, at first glance seems to be overly dramatic and manipulative as a way to garnish the public’s attention but is there more than meets the eye when it comes to Margery Kempe? I will argue that, Margery Kempe, in, The Book Of Margery Kempe, Book One, is in fact a feminist who uses her faith as a way to fight against ownership and inertness thus gaining independence and freedom from the patriarchal society.

The Right to No: State Obligations to Criminalize Marital Rape and International Human Rights Law. SSRN Electronic Journal, 41(1/3), 154-202. doi:10.2139/ ssrn.2704099 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health. (2015).

I agree with the statement that “we are well satisfied when Mrs. Pontellier deliberately swims out to her death in the waters of the gulf.” Pontellier had many lovers but still chose the one that she had the least amount of feelings for, Leonce. Edna Pontellier sends her children off to their grandparent’s house because her life is getting to hard to balance her random romances as well as with her children. I believe this to be extremely self-fish especially since she is already married. The person writing the review obviously thinks that if the author of the book would have made Edna Pontellier more likeable all of the readers would have been surprised or not have been excited when she ends up killing herself in the end. He also believes in

Humanitarian interference positions a hard trial for an international society constructed on the doctrines of sovereignty, intervention, and the use of force. Directly after the holocaust, the society of states recognized the laws prohibiting genocide, forbidding the exploitation of civilians, and identifying plain human rights. These humanitarian values often clash with doctrines of sovereignty. Sovereign states are required to perform as protectors of their citizens’ security, but what happens if states act as villains towards their own people, treating power as a pass to kill? Should dictatorial states be recognized as valid members of international society and permitted the protection afforded by the intervention norm? Or else, most states loss their sovereign rights and be exposed to reasonable intervention if they aggressively abuse or fail to protect their citizens? Connected to this, what responsibilities do other states or organizations have to enforce human rights standards against governments that vastly violate them?

Modern society is a fast-paced one that requires a lot of sacrifices to get by. One of those sacrifices is the time we spend with others to develop connections that lead to developing empathy for one another. This sacrifice of time leads us to have weaker ties with people around us. Connections with families, friends, and neighbors became weaker and occur less often, however, the human desire for love and empathy has not changed. As described by Fredrikson when she says “ Just as your supplies of clean air and nutritious food forecast how long you’ll walk on this earth-and whether you’ll thrive or just get by-so does your supply of love” (107). People need to experience what Fredrickson calls “positivity resonance” in their lives, which is why people will find ways to try and achieve this resonance.

In Pakistan, thousands of women are dying each year because they are being accused of dishonoring their families. “The reason is rooted in sexual inequality in such countries,” Terence McCoy insists. Individuals are killing just women, and a genocide is not technically being committed because sex is not protected under the UN’s definition. Not only should the UN change its definition of genocide to include sex, but also it should change its definition to include age.

Sophie of Anhalf-Zerbst was born on May 2, 1729 in the Germany city of Stettin (Szczecin, now Poland). She was born of a minor German prince, into a society that legally separated and isolated its female population. Though society was against her she was recognized by her father for her great ability to learn and remember concepts and ideas. After proving her ideas and abilities, she received a formal education. In 1744, at the age of 14, she married the Grand Duke Peter of Holstein who was heir to the Russian throne . Although Sophie was German she strove to be as Russian as her mother in-law. Sophie not only studied the Russian language, but she also took the name of Catherine II to honour her mother who was also named Catherine.

This “human-security state,” according to Amar, produces subjects in need of protection as well as areas in need of regulating, especially in sexualized, gendered, and racialized ways, it’s a shared modern governance model. Most studies of Brazil, Egypt, and other countries historicize the rise of neoliberal control during the late twentieth and early twenty-first century. Amar replaces this timeline with a cultivated security mode of governance that carried, neoliberal order by promising “to reconcile human rights and national security interests.” The human security based on the idea that strengthening human rights can enhance the security and safety of states through a subtle balancing of militarism and

Although many places in the world have made many advancements in granting women rights equivalent to those of men, there are still far too many places that refuse to recognize that women’s rights is still an issue, and an important one at that. Many developing countries in the world have caused outrage in the population of women as a whole and rifts in society and its social order. Worldwide, people are done with the fact that women are still not treated as equals. Although advancements have been made for the population of women globally in places like the US, Canada, and many parts of Europe; many developing countries throughout the world have refrained from allowing women equal opportunity politically, economically, and culturally.

My topic is over mcCarthyism so i am going to inform you about what it is, who it is ,and how it effected our country what made mcCarthyism so bad was that senator Joseph Macarthy had wrote a list of 205 people who he thought were guilty of communism the people on the list range from celebritys to other government officials and of the 205 names on the list only one was found to be communist Alger Hiss other than him everyone was falsely accused of being communist .

Women form half of the human beings inhabiting planet Earth. Since human rights are the rights of all human beings, male and female alike, human rights are women's rights. By the same token, a society in which men are not willing to extend human rights to their mothers, the women who bore and nurtured them; their daughters, products of their own loins; and their wives, the women who bear and raise their treasured sons, is a society in which men are unwilling to extend human rights to men of another family, tribe, language, religion, race, ethnic tradition, or nation. If a society does not hold justice and equality for all women in the highest regard, neither will it hold justice and equality for the many varieties of