Catholic Church Contraceptives

Contraception is the deliberate prevention of conception or impregnation by various drugs, techniques, or devices – also more famously known as birth control. This research paper will examine the views of both the Catholic Church and the view that opposes the Catholic Church on this practice. Each view will be examined thoroughly with the reasoning behind each unique view.

The idea of birth control has been around since before the eighteenth century. However, those in control of it have changed over time leading to several positive and negative effects including seeking underground abortions and disguised labeling of products for contraception.

Birth control has been studied for many years. Over the year’s people have discovered so many new things and applications. The history of birth control and the society around us has been affected by the impact of laws and the people.

The issue of birth control remains one of the most controversial issues within the Catholic Church dividing members at all levels including the clergy. The Roman Catholic Church for the past 2000 years has been a major opponent of artificial birth control (BBC). Pope Paul VI made a clear declaration on the use of birth control when he wrote ‘the Encyclical Letter ‘Human Vitae’ on July 25, 1968 which banned Catholics from using contraceptives (Pope VI). These important declarations demonstrate the power of the Papacy to shape public policy on matters relating to human health and reproduction on a global level. The belief within the Catholic Church is that God have the sole power over the creation of life and humans have no role in this

In Rev. Martin Rhonheimer’s article “The Contraceptive Choice, Condom Use, and Moral Arguments Based on Nature: A Reply to Christopher Oleson,” Christopher Oleson challenges on Rhonheimer’s views on contraception and the use of condoms. Oleson focuses mainly on Rhonheimer and Fr. Benedict Guevin exchange. The article’s logic which has a strong appeal of reasonableness. Unfortunately, Oleson’s critique is based on a misrepresentation of Rhonheimer’s view on contraception and the role of “nature” in moral argument. Oleson’s article also contains at least one rather baffling interpretation of Aquinas, which is both central to Oleson’s view of “nature” in moral argument, and utterly incorrect. Moreover, the article shows a surprising disregard

From the time when it became available the near the beginning of the 1960s, oral contraceptives, commonly called "the pill," have opened possibilities that had were shut to females for all of times gone by. Possibly more than any other sole factor, the pill has made it likely for women to be in charge of of their own lives and to attain their prospects. Nowadays, 100 million women all over the world use the pill. Nonetheless, there are emergencies ensuing from rape or failure to use contraceptive plans. There are in addition emergencies ensuing from accidental consensual sex. In spite of everything, the human sexual desire was fashioned by evolution to guarantee procreation, and it works extremely fine. Given the correct psychological stimulants, pretty much everyone, counting presidents of the United States and well-known religious leaders, will jeopardize it all for an illicit sexual rendezvous (Drazen, et al. 2004). To be adamant that society rely exclusively on self-restraint more willingly than contraception is to refute a nature beside which the gods themselves are unable to compete. The whole history of humanity can be interpreted as evidence to the influence of that nature.

There were quite a few options for contraceptives in the 20th century and it was made available for practically anyone and everyone at a surprisingly affordable rate. There were options like the Rhythm method which tried to pinpoint the time of sterilization for a woman around her usual cycle. At first they believed that the point of sterilization was after ovulation, but they later realized the truth was the exact opposite. This was one of the earliest attempts of contraceptives and it deemed not useful after further scientific investigation. Most religious individuals such as the Catholics were divided on if they were in favor of contraceptives or not because the line of God’s-will be deemed unclear. Later on another form of contraceptive became more prominent and this was the use of Spermicide and Douching. Scientists found

This week marks the forty-sixth anniversary of Pope Paul VI’s encyclical Humanae Vitae, a document which clarified the Church’s moral teaching on contraception. What is contraception? Contraception is, “any action which either before, at the moment of, or after sexual intercourse, is specifically intended to prevent procreation whether as an end or as a means” (Humanae Vitae 14). There are various methods of contraception that temporarily or permanently sterilize a couple, thus making it impossible to have children. Contraception destroys the union and love between couples. In this we find that contraception violates God’s plan of procreation. Contraceptives go against the gift of fertility by treating pregnancy as a disease. The issue of contraception has drawn worldwide attention with people divided on whether it is morally permissible to use any form of contraception. Society views contraception as a development in the modern world that helps in the regulation of birth. We find that many Catholics don’t understand this issue and the Church’s teaching on contraception has been misunderstood. The Church makes it clear through Humane Vitae that any use of contraception is morally wrong, for it violates the dignity of marriage and God’s plan of procreation. It is our understanding that marriage is a sacrament of love between two people, instituted by God, for the whole purpose of continuing his plan of creation. Marriage is the foundation of

Birth Control has been an issue that has divided many people throughout the country, largely along religious and ethical lines. Many people view birth control as a fundamental right and a necessity in today’s world. There are others that believe birth control to be immoral and a complete abomination against God and the teachings of the bible. There are those out there that believe under no circumstance should a birth control be used. They believe that God has intended us to reproduce and we cannot use any device that prevents his plan.

The film, The Pill, indicates the views from some Christian groups: they believe the contraceptive pill restrict the life right of the unborn children. Further, they believe that the contraceptive pill is against to the will of the God. In addition, ironically, in the testing process of the pill, women in the Puerto Rico were treated as experimental animals: they took the pills without being informed the side effects of the pills. The women in the Puerto Rico were sacrificed to risk themselves for the interest of the company who sold the pills. However, at the same time, because of them, the pills were able to be sold in the market, and lots of women could control their bodies and enjoy sex without being worry about the pregnancy.

Many new alternative view have surfaced throughout the Catholic Church. For example, until about 1970, the Orthodox Church opposed the use of contraception. However, a new view has surfaced. This new view is portrayed with the means that contraception is acceptable with a Christian marriage if 1) the means of contraception is not abortifacient, and 2) it is used with the blessing of one's spirit father, and 3) children are not completely excluded from the marriage (Francesco). However, this is not the Church saying that they are ok with contraceptives. The Church opposes contraceptives, but allows the use of them in special cases.

Birth control which is also formally known as contraception or fertility control are methods or devices used to prevent pregnancy. Birth control methods have been used for many years dating back all the way to ancient times. In fact Egypt has some of the earliest documented birth controls. For example the women there would use honey, acacia leafs and also lent to stuff up their vaginas to block the male sperm from entering. This has mainly to do with the religious view of the women. The Roman Catholic Church only agrees with natural family planning however there are a number of Catholics whom accept and agree with modern birth control methods. Also according to allaboutbirthcontrol.com Muhammad, who the Muslims believe to be the last and

The issues that are addressed in, Humanae Vitae, the encyclical letter from Pope Paul IV in January of 1968 are pertinent issues that were becoming more threatening to natural law exponentially. The letter was being written in light of sexual revolution that was giving people new options as to understand natural human acts in a new light. The major areas of concern that Pope Paul VI needed to address was what the church teaches especially on the topics of contraception, the sanctity of human life, the sanctity of marriage and its purpose of procreation, natural law and faithfulness to God’s design. The biggest threat that this document was defending was this notion that contraception was safe and not a bad thing to use within the confines of marriage. The truth of matter, which Pope Paul VI emphasizes, is that this explicitly defies natural law and what is natural to man’s capacity for procreation.

"Contraception could, simultaneously, unleash female sexuality from repression, uplift sexual experience into mystical communion, and rid humanity of poverty and deformity." (Woloch 363)

Birth control, also called contraceptives, is a method of preventing pregnancy. They work in different ways and are taken at