Cause And Effects Of Immigration In Europe

Northerners- British who migrated to the US settled in Virginia and Maryland and they came in as indentured servants. After the independence, their migration the US slow because America didn’t approve of their government. When Scotland suffered a severe economic depression in 1921, about 1.5 million Scots migrated to the US and many were professional and skills laborers. Many Scotch-Irish migrated to the US in the 18th century due to economic depression brought on by textile slump in Ireland. many also migrated due to religious freedom and farming. It is estimated that about 1 billion people from Francs migrated to the US religious persecution and economic opportunity.

Immigration is a kind of movement of people into destination land, which can be traced back to a million years ago. Also, the debate over whether immigrants should be given more rights has been an intractable problem for a long period. According to statistics from Wikipedia, as for 2005, the United Nations reported that there were nearly 191 million international immigrants worldwide, about three percent of the world 's population (Immigration). Although it does not seem to take up a large proportion, actually the amount of the immigrant population is particularly huge. In this way, policies on immigration are considered remarkably significant. Moreover, recently the attacks in European countries have also poured fuel on the already-heated debate over immigration policy. In most cases, local citizens and governments do not welcome immigrants into their own country, which is partly due to the discrimination. Obviously, it is unfair to them. Immigrants should be treated equally and given more rights than the rights they possess now because they contribute to boosting economy, creating a harmonious society and they are legal immigrants.

For the last year, people from the various regions of the globe have been fleeing their home countries and migrating toward several nations across Europe. What pushes them away and what draws them to their final destinations? Ascertaining a single motivation of immigration remains too complex to determine because a variety of factors and goals have lead to this grand movement. Several issues arise from increased numbers of immigrants who may or may not be finding what they seek.

Over the last decade, the number of immigrants has increased tremendously growing from 331,000 to a whopping 409,000. An increase of about 78,000 people ( Britannica). Despite media coverage on the issue many people are blind to the true nature of the situation . Therefore it is important to understand the extent to which immigration affects us all.

Immigration has become an alarming concern to the global development over the past decade. Most of the developing countries have been the center for the rising cases of the immigration in most parts of the world. It is because of the conflicts among these nations that make individuals move to other foreign states in search of peace, jobs and the hopes of having a good life (Gross 33). Nevertheless, there has been an upsurge in the campaign against the immigration in the developed countries. The continuous struggle of these immigrants’ control has increased due to the threats arising to the locals and the nations hosting them. That is why it is important to understand the economic, cultural and the social

In some periods of our history immigration is often associated with conflict and warfare. Nearly 8 million refugees found a new home in West Germany and 3.5 million in East Germany by 1950, as a result of Second World War. Other examples are Algerian independence in 1962 also resulted an inflow of one million Algerians into France in last than a year. The Balkan wars in the 1990s also led more than one million refugees into Germany. Some other periods of high immigration are related to economic need, mostly inflows into France, Germany and the Great Britain in 1950s and 1960s. Ethnic mix results from these movements are very different than others in Germany, France and

For decades, some Americans have wanted to believe that immigrants are the cause and effect of many problems that has happened in America. They have came up with many accusations to try to convince others that immigrants pose a threat to the physical, the social and the economic welfare of natives. They have wanted others to believe immigration causes harm towards America's economy, market wages, and the high unemployment rates for natives. But in reality immigrants do not “take American jobs” and, in fact, has convinced many researchers that immigrants has promoted economic growth over the years (The Conversation).

The article shows the state of immigration in US, Germany and the Great Britain. According to the article, thesethree nations have the highest number of immigrants in the world. Some of the reasons that the article give as the triggering factor behind many people immigrating to these nations is to seek better opportunities such as jobs. Due to the nation’s state of peace many people also get attracted to go stay there as the state of peace in their nations depredates.

As the world evolves, people tend to move from country to country or within a country. Each country or city has its own push factors that push away immigrants, while others have pull factors that make immigrants drawn to that country or city. Furthermore, having to emigrate also has its barriers, making it harder to emigrate to where settlers want to be, and there are reasons for why people decide to migrate, too. There are several reasons why people decide to immigrate, why they choose to immigrate to that place, and why not other places.

especially for Europe. for example, comparing Europe and the US. I don’t see why European states should even try to stop economic migration. Europe’s population is set to decline over the next 50 years. due to the high rate of migration by youthful population. it is said Italy will lose 28% of its population by 2050. In order for Italy to stay productive, Italy would need to start importing more than 350,000 immigrants per year. Immigration in the US has brought a substantial amount of benefits in the free market system. it has contributed to innovation; for example, look at the amount of foreigners in Silicon Valley doing jobs that native workers refuse,such as sustaining Californian

A few weeks ago, a picture about a dead boy on the beach let us pay attention to Migration waves. Governments have to consider how to limit migration trends because they think a large number of immigrants will lead to a terrible effect on local residents. Based on this point, some countries adopted some strategies to limit migration. They reduced some benefits and increased the difficulty to immigrants. Even some governments such as Japan government refuse to people to immigrate. Even though immigrants bring some benefits, governments are still afraid of the negative impact of immigration on the following three aspects: local market, wages and social stability. However, some facts and research show the terrible effect is not significant to these parts. And immigrants also bring some benefits to local residents.

The changing faces of European migration, at the beginning of the new millennium is different from those of fifty years ago. Also, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans emigrated greatly, but nowadays the impact of immigration has become a significant economic and social phenomenon in many previous emigration countries.

In this respect, it is worthy of mention that such a situation with the migration is the result of the recent trend in the world economy which is characterized by processes which are generally called globalization. The process of globalization is overwhelming and involves practically all countries of the world with rare exceptions which

Centuries ago, when trans national movements of people were not subject to strict immigration rules, scholars did not consider immigration worth of analysis. Samuel Herbert did not consider immigration as an issue to affect customs, character, or the institution of the British people; “…it is no more able to affect the qualities of the nation than a can of hot water is able to affect the qualities of the nation than a can of hot water is able to affect the temperature of the sea (Samuel, 1905:332). Today no serious social scientist could possibly ignore the effect of immigration since immigration is an issue more than a ‘can of hot water in the sea. Although it is believed that every nation is to be the creation of overlapping generations of immigrants (Stalker 2001), it is essential to understand that the current influx of migrant(labor) in the processes of international migration and globalization is fundamentally different from earlier forms. In modern immigration, it is noticeable that dramatic shifts in destinations, restrictions on residency and overtly strict limitations on settlement, imposed by immigration policies (Falson 2004).

To measure societal acceptance towards immigrants, attitudinal data can be utilized to better understand the effects of immigration on both societies. One way to measure the general political reaction of each country towards the influx of immigrants. Though such data is constrained by temporal boundaries, a blanket understanding can be gleamed from surveys taken in nations during different periods. Further, in both countries, support for the importance of mainstream right-wing strategies has exacerbated the politicization of the immigrant issue. A survey asking identical questions in the two countries was conducted by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia in 2000. The Swedes tend to be more positive than the Danes, but the differences are not dramatic. However, similarly to Denmark, societal attention to the issue increased in the 1980s, not least due to a considerable growth in the number of refugees from the Middle East. In both nations, there are clear trends that reveal a significant rise in negative attitudes towards immigrants; but, the levels of said societal and political attention towards immigrants and the policies enacted which affect immigrants differ greatly in Sweden and Denmark.