Causes And Disadvantages Of Culture Shock

The first positive aspect of cultural relativism is the belief that there is no universal culture even though culture is universal (Chiariello, 2013). That each cultures has their own separate beliefs, tradition, values, and morals. That there is no one true or false way of living. That the rights and wrongs of one culture might not be the same for another culture. For example, in most third world countries children are forced into hard labor to provide for their families. Children in the United States might think that to be wrong and unethical but to those children in those countries this is what is needed of them and doesn’t see it to be wrong or unethical in any way. That difference doesn’t mean that one’s culture is superior or inferior to another’s culture. It means that as human we have to adapt to the surrounding in order to survive.

43). For example, in high school I hung out with the so called “popular” kids and they would always act stuck up like they were too good for everyone else. However,being in a PLUR culture I see being “popular” as being everyone's friend. This was ethnocentric to me because to me I thought you were popular by how many friends you had not by how much money you had. On the other hand, cultural relativism, means putting yourself in another person’s shoes and trying to “understand a culture on its own terms” (p.44). I would say I practice cultural relativism all the time because to me it’s something that interests me. I like the whole study of the brain and society. Before arguing I do take in consideration of what the other person have to say before explaining my point of

Any person that would judge somebody on their cultural standards or traditions is guilty of ethnocentrism. When people are guilty of this they believe that what they’ve learned is right is the most superior and what other people and cultures do is completely abnormal and weird. On the other hand cultural relativism is quite opposite; it is the belief that all cultures are equally valid and no culture is more superior then another when comparing them.

Cultural Relativism is the idea that what is right and what is wrong depends on what culture you live in. James Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy used an example of Ancient Greeks and the Callatians and their disposal of the dead. The Greeks believed that the most respectful way to honor the dead is to cremate the body; the Callatians thought differently, they believe that the most respectful way to honor the dead as to eat the body of the dead so that the family would

Cultural relativism -“the principle of regarding the beliefs, values, and practices of a culture from the viewpoint of that culture itself". Cultural Relativism relies on the hypothesis that ethical frameworks, which differ throughout the world, are all plausible in their own individual right .If you buy into the thought of cultural relativism, one tends to suspend judgment of other societies controversial rituals and practices. Thus to ‘completely accept” all customs must blur our perception of right and wrong. I will explore cultural relativism alongside the morality behind the gun control laws in the United States of America (USA), in conjunction with the concept of arranged marriage specific to India, and ultimately come to a clear conclusion

Chapter 3 of The Real World: An Introduction to Sociology explains to the reader what culture is and goes into depth of the different concepts within culture. It defines culture as “the entire way of life for a group of people” (Ferris & Stein, 2010, p. 77). Culture is described as a “lens” through which one views the world and is passed from one generation to the next. This “entire way of life”, according to sociologists, consists of two major categories: material and symbolic culture. Material culture involves the entities associated with a cultural group, such as tools, machines, utensils, buildings, and artwork. When examining material culture, it can convey a great deal about a particular group or society. Symbolic culture embraces ways

Cultural relativism is the idea that human behavior, ideas, and emotions must be understood in the context of the whole culture in which they occur.

According to Anonymous in Dissoi Logoi Cultural Relativism is defined as, “only an individual’s perspective can determine the value of a given object, act, experience, and so on. (Anonymous, 1979, p. 47). Anonymous provides 5 sections on Cultural Relativism, Good and Bad, Seemly and Shameful, Just and Unjust and Truth and Falsehood. On Good or Bad he gives us the example, “Death is bad for those who die, but good for the undertakers and grave diggers.” (Anonymous, 1979, 48). In Seemly and

Cultural Relativism is understanding and analyzing other cultures in terms of that culture’s internal standards and conditions. One example as to how I have acted or thought using cultural relativism is when I was younger I would always wonder why Muslim women would wear a hijab. Later on as I grew up I learned that Muslim women would dress that way because it was part of their culture. In our culture that would be considered weird or inappropriate but to their culture its appropriate and

Cultural relativism is the theory where there is no objective truth in morality, and moral truths are determined by different cultures. The primary argument used to justify cultural relativism is the cultural differences argument, which claims different cultures have different moral practices and beliefs, therefore, there is no objective truth in morality (Newton). After reading James Rachels The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, I find his criticisms to be persuasive because the argument made for Cultural Relativism is not sound from a logical point of view. You cannot draw a conclusion about what is factual based on what people believe is factual. Rachels also points out that even though cultures do in fact disagree about moral values,

I think that immigrants nowadays face a greater degree of culture shock than people in the past. For example, “When I first came to the States I was shocked by the gargantuan proportions of those around

Cultural Relativism is based on the idea that there is no ultimate standard of good or evil, so every judgment about right and wrong is a product of society. Therefore, any opinion on morality or ethics is subject to the cultural perspective of each person.

Cultural relativism is the way society separates right from wrong within a culture. What we describe as “good” and “bad” is based off of our cultural beliefs. Cultural relativism argues that no culture is better than any other and all their beliefs are equally valid. The way that modern society is has made it possible for almost everything to be justified.

Cultural relativism suggests that whatever any culture does is acceptable and we must positively judge other cultures’ practices—it is “right” for them. Who am I to judge differently? Cultural relativism arises out of a concern not to impose our cultural values on other cultures. The problem with believing that all values are

Cultural relativism means the exact opposite of ethnocentrism. It can be summed up as believing that “all religious, ethical, aesthetic, and political beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity” (www.cultural-relativism.com). This means that there is no definite “right” or “wrong”, but rather an ever-changing set of values for each separate culture.