Causes Of Accident Analysis

Employers, managers and supervisors should all ensure that workplace practices reflect the risk assessment and safety statement. Behavior, the way in which everyone works, must reflect the safe working practices laid down in these documents. Supervisory checks and audits should be carried out to determine how well the aims set down are being achieved. Corrective action should be taken when required. Additionally, if a workplace is provided for use by others. The safety statement must also set out the safe work practices that are relevant to them. Hence, it is

Normal accidents are very closely linked to risk society. As our culture takes on new, more advanced technologies and

Training should be given in such a way that hazardous situations can be avoided. For example: Lengthening of working day, removal of taking screening breaks etc for meeting deadlines should be avoided. You must ensure that the significant hazards are identified, and that the actual working practices are addressed and if need be, changed so as to reduce any risk. This is both the responsibility of the employer and employee, for example it is the employees responsibility to familiarise themselves with the hazards and risks in their workplace.

Reporting of Injuries,Diseases and dangerous occurrences regulations of 1995 requires the reporting of work-related accidents, diseases and dangerous occurrences. The Act applies to all work related activities, but not to all work related incidents. The objective of the regulations is to enable the enforcing authorities to identify where and how risks arise and to investigate serious accidents so as to prevent them from occurring in the future and thus providing a safer work environment. The enforcing authorities can then help and advise you on preventive action to reduce injury, ill health and accidental loss,the main points of our own policy that relate to this are:

Also to avoid dangerous moving and handling, the employees then have the responsibility of making sure they use all equipment as they have been trained to do so, follow all health and safety working practices within their workplace, avoid putting themselves, other staff, individuals or visitors at risk, and making sure they report any hazards or risks to their employer.

It is important to recognise the different responsibilities and approaches of a member of staff, the employer and others in the work setting. For example the employer is responsible to provide PPE and relevant health and safety training free of charge. It is then the responsibility of a staff member to use the PPE and to attend the training. So although the responsibilities are different they are also related and both need to work in order to ensure a high standard of health and safety. The employer provides as safe working environment, however if an accident or incident occurs it requires the efforts of both staff and sometimes others to report this to ensure measures are put into place to reduce any risk associated with the incident or accident. Another example of how health and safety has a linked responsibility can be shown through a member of staff ensuring they provide the relevant fire safety information/instructions to others. It is then the responsibility for others to follow these instructions.

Infection- Worker should not come to work if they have an illness that can be passed e.g infection until the risk has gone.

Accordingly, they found 48 employer safety obligations (e.g., provide personal protective equipment, reward safe working behaviour, and investigates hazards and risks), and 36 employee safety obligation items such as use work equipment properly, report safety incident, and follow safety rules.. However, even though they did not use psychometrically validated measurement, those obligation items can be used in the measuring physical psychological safety. Thus, physical risk psychological safety items will be derived from this measurement.

Outcome R2: Exercise leadership skills needed to contain the scene and determine the root cause(s).

This responsibility motivates the HR department and managers to implement stringent policies to prevent work-related injuries to avoid paying for higher workers’ compensation insurance. Moreover, it inspires the company to promote safety by organizing a safety committee to address hazards in the workplace to prevent injuries or deaths. The committee solicits employee suggestions and participation to increase compliance to company policies. It also develops various safety programs to promote employee wellness to improve their quality of life (Gomez-Mejia, et al, 2010).

Root Cause Analysis is an important tool that many researchers and problem solvers use to identify and solve problems. Not only do they determine what and how an event occurred, but they also identify how it happened. It is also used to prevent some problems and events from occurring again. When the reason why the problem occurred is identified, it can often be fixed by discovering how to prevent the issue. In most cases the investigation leads to human error, or operator cause, as they claim in the article.

Part of the employer’s responsibility is to control potential workplace hazard and correct hazardous conditions or practices as they occur or are recognized. If an employer effectively identifies these or other red flags, he should begin and keep accurate documentation of the incident, investigate the accident adequately, and provide safety and health training annually.

In established democracies, victims of road traffic accidents have access to redress when factors responsible for an accident are identified 23-24. Compensation

Another disadvantage that has been identified is the construction of a the time line especially with actors that developed some time before the accident, in example the time line for the appearance of a crack in a metal surface caused by metal fatigue can not be easily determined when it happened and most importantly when that metal fatigue evolved to a crack, even though the effects of the crack can be established. The MES method requires the identification of a condition and its link to an event of the accident. The advantage is that it permits the investigator to identify underlying conditions and avoid re-occurrence in the future. However this step of the MES methodology has been debated and supposed that conditions are not required since their effect to an event cannot be presented until an action by the actor is performed. Following with the above the investigator is required to identify all causal factors and their relationship with the events that preceded the accident. This step of the MES process is important since investigators are required to examine and identify all causal factors include the alternative that may be related with the accident. Upon the conclusion of the above steps recommendations and corrective actions are drafted in an effort to avoid

The aim of this essay is to determine the inevitability of organisational accidents. An organisational accident is defined as an undesired or potentially disastrous event that is caused by the decisions and actions of the company. This essay will argue that organisational accidents cannot be avoided. As a first step, this essay will detail Perrow’s Normal Accident Theory in which he asserts that the implementation of complex systems by organisations / companies has resulted in unpreventable organisational accidents. The 2011 Fukasmi nuclear accident will be explained to support this assertion. As a second step, human error by those in the organisation as a factor which causes accidents will be analysed through Reason’s