preview

Censorship In John Steinbeck's The Grapes Of Wrath

Decent Essays
Open Document

John Steinbeck’s The Grapes Of Wrath is a Great American classic. There is much controversy about this book. Many people people believe this book should be censored. Others think if you censor a book you're destroying the reason a book is written. There are many benefits to censoring books. It protects children from being exposed to explicit topics. It also protects the morals of our society. Grapes of Wrath should be censored for its explicit use of sexual content, political content, and criticism of Californians .

Grapes of Wrath had many instances that are sexually inappropriate that would lead this book to be censored. One example is that the former preacher, Jim Casy, would lay in the grass with girls after mast. A religious leader is expected to have morals and be respectful of his fellow worshipers. Not taking advantage of girls; right after he preached to them to stay pure and holy. This action would offend many people. Causing the book to be censored. …show more content…

Criticism of mechanization of labor is one of the major arguments. The Joads and other families farmed the land by hand. When the tractors came, it meant that the family would be kicked off the land and the bank would foreclose. People hated the tractor. Instead of technological advances being seen as a good thing, it was seen as a evil force to push over houses and take land. Another common political error is that the police are seen as evil. The police would kick people of ditches for doing nothing wrong. They would also monitor the borders of california and turn a family back for the smallest of things. Police are supposed to be seen as a helpful and friendly; not a dark evil villain. The last way is the preacher's take on religion. Casy believed that everyone was part of a single spirit, and there was no sin; just screw ups. This challenges catholic ideas. Many people are offended by this and think it is

Get Access