Ceri Dean Chapter 9 Summary

The scientific method is defined as " a way of learning that emphasizes observation and experimentation- to understand the world" (Tro, 2015, p. 6). The scientific method involves major characteristics such as an observation. When making an observation, it can simply be by looking at a sample with your eyes or by using instruments that can make observing a sample easier, such as a microscope. Next, the scientist would formulate a hypothesis. Formulating a hypothesis is simply stating what the scientist observed and what they want to explore and measure. Following the creating of a hypothesis comes conducting an experiment using the hypothesis. Conducting an experiment is a “highly controlled observations designed to validate or invalidate hypotheses” (Tro, 2015, p. 6). Lastly, the scientific method concludes with laws and theories. In some cases, experiments and observations can lead to the development of a

My activity used many steps to the scientific method. Each student formed a hypothesis without even trying. Many would say that they were going to do better with my right eye open, or with both eyes open. Then they were to do the experiment, where data was taken. After the experiment they could analyze their data and could detect where they had actually done the best and why.

Introduction: The Scientific Method is a universal set of steps that all scientists use while performing a procedure. The Scientific Method contains six steps. The first step is to think of a problem or question. The second step is to formulate a hypothesis about the original question. The hypothesis should be a educated guess on what the answer to the question should be.

The term scientific method refers to a way of investigation or the acquisition of knowledge through the testing of a theory or hypothesis, then working through measurements (observation and empirical notes) to come up with a result, which should prove or disprove the original theory. Thus, the basic method consists of a) formulating a question or hypothesis, b) designing an experiment or means of collecting data, c) observation or experimentation, d) analyzing

Even children are capable of understanding the scientific method. On a website intended to help children with their science fair projects, the steps of the method are carefully outlined. These steps include asking a question; doing research; creating a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis through an experiment; analyzing the data; drawing a conclusion and also communicating results. The scientific method studies causal relationships versus the engineering design process, which involves creating something new. Each step of the process contains links to pages which provide further, specific details about each step, such as finding high-quality resources and constructing experiments with appropriate controls.

Scientific-based instruction is something that teachers use all the time in their classroom. Teachers are consistently assessing and evaluating students’ performance, creating and amending individual education plans, lesson plans, and reflecting on their practices. As teachers, we should be doing rigorous research and building hypothesis to base further teaching practices on.

The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. The scientific inquiry is a way to investigate things and purpose explanation for their observations. Data is gathered, hypothesis suggested, and observations recorded.

A scientific method is a procedure to explore aspects of the question or new idea to discover a conclusion, it is the basic guide to answering ideas, and is the backbone of science. Throughout science all sides of the test must be discovered before any overall conclusion can be made. This helps reduce controversy and helps to prevent public outbreaks as all areas of the topic wasn’t discovered properly and is something to follow to ensure all parts are correctly covered. This is because the test can become inaccurate and cannot be fully identified as all areas of the test have not been trailed. It is a process for experimentation which is used to explore and answer questions. When scientists cannot directly

The standards attached to this lesson plan states the student should develop abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry and understand scientific inquiry. Students should also be able to develop an understanding of science as a human endeavor and the history of science. Again, the formative-assessment doesn’t

The first challenge is the science curriculum in secondary school: this curriculum is very dry, heavy and we are obliged to explain it all and it takes a very long time to finish it and prevents us to realize different methods of learning to explain the content in a clear and thorough manner. In addition, prevents us from using the different teaching methods and to realize all the experiments necessary for each chapter which is very important in relation to the students to bring them closer to the sciences. Experiments

The following essay aims to discuss the most appropriate methodology suitable for scientific education, and by doing so discusses the various limitations of both overarching methods, induction and deduction. In this essay, Alan Chalmers (What Is This Thing Called Science?, 1976, p. 1) will be used to present a common inductive view on science, whereas Karl Popper’s, Hypothetico Deductivism method will portray a deductive view on science. I go onto argue that despite science being rational, and therefore inductive, I tend to disagree with some aspects of Chalmer’s view on science through the evidence shown through Karl Popper’s research. Overall, this study seeks to establish the resonance of accepting both deductive and inductive reasoning as the basic methodologies upon which scientific research and discoveries proceed, along with discussing the various problems that Popperian hypothetico-deductivists might find with Chalmer’s view, and my overall response to that view.

The scientific method is commonly described as a four-step process involving observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion. And Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information. Design theorists hypothesize that if a natural object was designed, it will contain high levels of complex and specified information. Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information.

I found these suggestions by Worth and Grollman informative because I was previously unaware of these strategies in helping to create and structure science lessons. As someone who struggles with science content, this provides me with some helpful suggestions for my practice. I recognize it is tools and strategies like the ones offered by Worth and Grollman that can make a difference in my future science curriculum development. I understand I need to continue to develop my science content knowledge through searching out reading like Worth and Grollman.

There are differences between inductive approach and deductive approach. Gollin (1998) stated that the inductive approach applied students to work out what the rules are from examples and find out what the meanings are throughout the given examples or practices whilst the deductive approach happened when teacher gives the explicit rules first. To be more specific, the former refers to working from the general to more specific whereas the latter moving from specific observations to broader generalizations. The concept of “discovery techniques” in Harmar (1987) is a keeping of what inductive approach which students start with several examples and will be soon asked to generate the rules through their experiences and examples. Upon Harmar’s idea, Scrivener (2011) prompt the concept of “ guided discovery” which is “activities that allow learners to generate their own discoveries and explanations” (Scrivener, 2005). Broadly speaking, it is a consciousness raising in order to help learners notice how a structure works.

The question of whether a teacher should use the deductive or the inductive approach is not a clear cut one, since both do have their advantages and disadvantages. However, research (Brown, 2007, p. 423) seems to show it is best to focus on teaching with a