Cesar Chavez Nonviolent Speech Summary

To make nonviolence the more logical option, Chavez implements logos and leads readers to believe that violence takes too many sacrifices. After identifying the advantages of nonviolence, he gives the readers two possible conclusions to make about the brutal opposite: “either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers” (Chavez). Presenting these two unfavorable options uses the logos appeal and persuades the audience to see nonviolence as the more reasonable choice with more promising outcomes. At another point in the article, Chavez tells the audience to simply “examine history” (Chavez). The straightforward statement causes readers to recall violent events of the past and logically recognize them as inferior to the previously mentioned nonviolent protests. This conclusion helps Chavez achieve his purpose by persuading the audience to side with his point of view and support nonviolence. After establishing his argument on sound reasoning, Chavez uses that foundation to employ other rhetorical appeals.

In the excerpt, Cesar Chavez, labor union organizers and civil rights leader, discusses how nonviolent resistance to problems in society easily resolves a situation better than violent protest. Throughout his speech, he uses many rhetorical strategies to argue his view on nonviolent resistance. Chavez’ use of ethos, logos, and pathos, creates his passionate attitude towards nonviolent resistance.

Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader fighting for improving pay and working conditions of farmers, employs the use of nonviolence resistance in his role as a leader of the United Farm Workers. As a child, Chavez and his family worked as farmers on a field as migrant workers who were most likely treated in an unjust manner and thus, he dedicated his life to improving the conditions for all farmers. To honor Martin Luther King Jr. on the 10th anniversary of his death, Chavez wrote to a religious magazine that helps people in need about the benefits of nonviolent resistance. Throughout his letter, Chavez applies rhetorical devices such as pathos, diction, and juxtaposition to persuade and inform people about how powerful and effective nonviolence techniques can be for civil rights.

During his address to The Commonwealth Club of San Francisco on November 9, 1984 Cesar Chavez sought support for the United Farm Workers by using rhetorical strategies such as pathos, logos and ethos to convey his message that farm workers need to stop allowing other people to treat them like inhuman farming implements to be disposed of whenever the owner feels they’ve become unprofitable. Chavez's speech starts with a description of a tragedy that highlights the mistreatment of migrants and ends with the belief that the descendants of Hispanic farm workers are the future of California and their accomplishments will enrich the entire nation. The Cesar E. Chavez Foundation articulates that as leader of the United Farm Workers of America, Cesar Chavez, saw the hopes for better lives for Mexican, Mexican American, and Hispanic workers in the United States repeatedly raised, sunk, and revived again. Many factors contributed to this seemingly unending fluctuation from hopefulness to despair, and Chavez's

Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King Jr. were connected by a telegram and a common goal of civil rights. On the tenth anniversary of King’s death, Chavez wrote an epitaph for King. The rhetorical devices used in the article highlight clear points in agreement and contrasting with King, while displaying a simple idea: nonviolence is key.

The 60s, a period of hurt and violence. With violence all around, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. promoted nonviolent protests to guide America during a time of outrage. With sit ins, and his “I Have a Dream” speech, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. paved the way for success that our county needed. Along the way, he inspired millions of people including Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader. With the help of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Chavez wrote a well articulated article explaining the importance of nonviolence. Cesar Chavez promotes nonviolence though appealing to pathos that leaves the audience with little doubt as to the proper course of action, decisive short syntax, and precise word choice that helps the reader

When caught in an injustice, protesters tend to use various strategies in attempt to successfully convey their opinions. In an article published by Cesar Chavez, he describes his fight for civil rights by using Martin Luther King Junior’s methods to show how violence fails to promote victory. Chavez appeals to his audience by using ethos, pathos, and allusion to highlight how nonviolence is more of an effective form of protesting.

This situation makes the audience feel sorrow for these poor family. It is difficult for a child seeing their parents struggle for them and not have enough money for payments. This speech asserts the appeal to pathos in order for the audience feel the struggle and consequences and farm worker goes through, In addition Chavez also showed logo and pathos appeals when he mentions the solutions of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act. He cites,

Cesar continues by remembering an anecdote in which he continues to build the credibility: “In scattered instances, in San Jose, Sacramento, Oakland, Los Angeles and other places, priests would speak out loudly and clearly against specific instances of oppression, and in some cases, stand with the people who were being hurt”. Chavez continues to add to the credibility and appeal of the church by mentioning an encounter they had with priests from the church which is from a time when the priests spoke out about the injustices and even stood with the people. Chavez then appeals to the farm workers by mentioning “Frs. McDonald, McCollough, Duggan and others” they are people who fought side by side with them and they could be very important to these people.

Firstly, ethos is continuously used in Chavez's article as a rhetorical strategy. An example of ethos found in the article includes "no one has the right to take it[human life] for any reason or for any cause" (9-10). This pertains to the result of death if violent

Cesar Chavez started his excerpt by defining the power of nonviolence and how it portrayed throughout Dr. King’s life. While Caesars compares and contrast the power of nonviolence to violence he use rhetorical device such repetition ,diction and tone. Which shows how Cesar Chavez literary devices help him drive his argument to a nonviolent resistance.

Throughout Chavez’s article, he uses much of ethos, pathos, and logos, which are only a few of the many rhetorical devices that can be used to support one’s claims, idea’s, and arguments. Furthermore, Chavez continues his use of these rhetorical devices to emphasis on the importance of not participating in aggressive actions since they usually lead to complications. For instance, Chavez asserts that “When victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached … victory would come at the expense of injury and perhaps death”(65-68). This quote from Cesar Chavez is an example of pathos since, previously mentioned, he is aiming to reach the sensitive side of his audience. He does this so that his readers object to vicious behaviors

The way he flows through the appeals adds a definition to his purpose. Chavez expresses a great deal of pathos throughout this piece, he connects with his audience by doing this. He points out the disparity of violence and how people abuse this nature. He relates to Martin Luther King Jr. through their shared belief of a complete non-violence. Also chavez references to Gandhi and how he taught and expresses the instruments of non-violence. Cesar chavez reveals the truth about violence towards our working men and women. Boycotts and rampages were referred to as “weapons against grower” and “a way of avoiding our senseless violence”. He uses this to show the power of violence, but the even greater power of

In the excerpt, by Cesar Chavez the author argues that fighting with violence is not the answer. The intended purpose of the article is to inform the people of a better and safer way to fight. Through the use use of diction and imagery the Chavez appeals to to emotion and exemplifies the significance for change. Chavez’s use of diction helps encourage people to fight for change. In the article he stresses how, “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.”

The comparison of violence to nonviolence highlights Chavez’s argument that nonviolence is the only way to achieve positive results. Chavez characterizes violence as a temporary solution in which “people suffer.” This description of violence as a last resort that results out of frustration is in stark contrast to Chavez’s characterization of nonviolence. Nonviolence stems from oppression. It is exercised as a form of self-determination