preview

Cesar Chavez's Rhetorical Choices

Decent Essays
Open Document

Rhetorical choices can be made by a writer to perused readers of their point. They help the reader gain a better understanding of the argument, as well as add passion to the words. In his piece in a religious magazine, Cesar Chavez uses rhetorical devises to strengthen his argument advocating nonviolence in a religious magazine. Chavez uses rhetorical devises to form a persuasive writing style and appeal to the reader’s conscience and sense of reason in order to promote nonviolent resistance. Chaves uses formal language and anaphora to make his writing more persuasive. By using formal language, the piece seems much less personal than if he had used informal language. This way, it seems like less of an opinion piece and more of a factual one, with his personal views put aside. The article then seems more reliable. He also uses anaphora, the repetition of the beginning of a sentence. For example, …show more content…

Allusion appeals to sense of reason as it creates credibility. First Chaves refers to Martin Luther King Jr.’s nonviolent and states that the protest has matured. He also refers to Gandhi and his method of boycott. Both examples remind the reader that nonviolent resistance has worked in the past and that it can work in the future. This relates to anticipating objection, where Chaves states that many people believe violence is the only option after dealing with so much pent up frustration. He goes on to explain that violence is not the only option and that nonviolence needs to be stuck to in order for it to work. Also, the examples of Dr. King and Gandhi prove that nonviolence works if done correctly. Last, Chaves uses moral reasoning to advocate nonviolence. He writes that God did not give man the right to take another’s life, no matter what the cause is. This will especially appeal to his audience’s morals since this piece is for a literary

Get Access