Changes Of Indian Economy And The Social Sectors, Poverty, And Reform

1432 Words6 Pages
Sectorial changes in Indian Economy with reference to Liberalization, Privatization & Globalization post 1991 - The social sectors, Poverty and Reform Introduction In July 1991 the new model of economic reforms in India know as Globalization, Liberalization and Privatization started to create an economy that was the fastest building economy. This reform was successful in terms of building the economy but as India has a diverse society the rapid growth bought inequalities in the society. As a consequence people became opposed to the idea of globalization, liberalization and privatization. India lags behind in general education standard and achievement and also in health and health improvement . These are the sectors where government…show more content…
India has a high proportion of manufacturing companies. These manufacturing companies are generally labor concentrated and they will be labor demanding but the use of labor has been discouraged and use of capital has been encouraged especially in the organized sector. Even in the agricultural sector there is more of self-sufficiency crops such as sugar and edible oil than those that require intensive farming techniques. The demand for unskilled labor has reduced over time in India. Poverty and Reform in the Short Run India’s stabilization was remarkably successful compared to the most other countries. “Stabilization is unavoidable and has nowhere, not even in India, been achieved without hurting the poor people to an extent” . Despite the success of the devaluation some reductions in expenditure were required to create a number of these cuts, which were in Social Services (SS) and expenditure in Rural Development (RD). In 1991-1992 the central nominal expenditure rose by 1.5 %, 1992-1993 it rose by 17.5 % (depending on the price index). By any measure there was a sharp fall in 1991-1992, the recovery in 1992-1993 still left real expenditure below 1990-1991 by using the consumer price index (CPI) for industrial workers and 8 % using CPI for agricultural labors. The states, which account for regarding 80 % of SSRD, were squeezed by a fall in transfers from the center with marginal SSRD expenditure rising by 12.7% and
Open Document