Changes in treatment of goodwill due to IFRS 3

According the above assessment of qualitative factors for both companies, I think that the goodwill impairment test is necessary for Dynamic because Dynamic has many negative impacts. Although the Dynamic has 3% of gross profit margins over competitors, it was not enough to offset the negative impacts; I think that the goodwill impairment test is not necessary for ZD. Due to ZD shows all positive impacts improving operation condition.

Goodwill is not amortised. Instead, goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, and is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.For the purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Group 's cash-generating units (CGUs), or groups of CGUs, expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. CGUs (or groups of CGUs) to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired.If the recoverable amount of the CGU (or groups of CGUs) is less than the carrying amount of the CGU (or groups of CGUs), the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU (or groups

Education for stakeholders related to changes in financial statement is considered as significant as well. In a way, companies have

Where explain the concept of Intangible asset, which represents assets that absence of physical substance. Moreover, Goodwill represents an asset from which is expected future economic benefits, emerge from the acquisition of other assets or business combination. Another important point would be the impartments testing as refers ASC 350-20-35-28 where indicates that Goodwill of reporting unit must be tested for impairment annually. The test can be accomplished at any time in the fiscal year. In the case of different reporting unit, the impairment test could be at different times. This citation in the memorandum was provided incorrect (ASC 305-20-35-1 and 28) this encoding does not exist in FASB.

We will discuss whether the Company’s approach for testing goodwill for impairment after recognizing an impairment charge related to a long-lived asset group classified as held-and-used is appropriate. This issue pertains to whether it is feasible to have a long-lived asset impairment without goodwill impairment.

Goodwill Impairment is the Goodwill that has become or is considered to be of lower value than at the time or purchase. From an accounting perspective, when the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds the fair value, then it is considered to be impaired. Negative publicity about a firm can create goodwill impairment, as can the reduction of brand-name recognition. Since the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) first introduced its standards update on testing for goodwill impairment (ASU 2011-08), entities with goodwill on their balance sheet have had the option when testing goodwill for impairment to first assess qualitative factors as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the traditional two-step approach described in ASC Topic 350. The optional qualitative assessment is commonly referred to as “step zero.”

In September 2002 the IASB and the FASB agreed to work together, in consultation with other national and regional bodies, to remove the differences between international standards and US GAAP. (Dorata, 2008) However, the convergence of IFRS and FASB is coming to the end. (Golden, 2013)

Access to capital markets in United Kingdom is easy after the adoption of IFRs. Public capital markets play an important role in financing the activities of non-financial companies in the United Kingdom, providing them with the main option to bank loans and private sources of finance. These set of international accounting standards helped reduce the information processing and auditing costs to the UK’s market participants. With the help of adoption of IFRS it is expected to lower information costs to capital markets, and the UK

This issue started to arise when IASB was developing IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements. The IASB have decided to remove the option to apply proportionate consolidation to jointly controlled entities that existed under IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures and this has widened the scope of equity method under IFRS (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group, 2014). Since then the IASB has been doing research project on equity method of accounting and considering various requests for guidance through narrow-scope amendments to IAS 28. Hence, Exposure Drafts has been published. They have addressed the diversity in practice. However, these proposed amendments are lacked of a clear conceptual basis and they were inconsistent with each other. They found out that components of consolidation techniques and measurement basis exist in IAS 28 and there is no

The authoritative guidance for asset impairment is to ensure that impairment is recorded and dealt with as depreciation. The scope of the standard is writing off of assets and depreciation. According to the guidance of 360-10-35, it address how long-lived assets that are intended to be held and used in an entity’s business shall be reviewed for impairment. The impairment loss can only be recognized if the carrying amount of a long-lived assets is not recoverable and

In intellectual property assets and software showed its opening balance, closing balance, additions, disposals, accumulated amortization and impairment currency translation differences and net amount. Goodwill just showed the opening and closing balance and currency translation difference not any impairment loss. However, in intangible capital work in progress, it also showed other more informationabout amount transferred to software intangibles and transferred from PPE. At the end of the notes 12 of intangible assets, it provided additional information about the amortization charge that was recognized in general and administration expenses in the statement of comprehensive income （CSL annual report 2011）and impairment tests for cash generating units containing goodwill. CSL Behring and CSL Blotheraples all were CSL’s goodwill. The total intangible assets in 2011 were lower than before because of amortization in every year.

Goodwill is an intangible asset for which the accounting methods are pronounced by FASB issued _SFAS No. 142_, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Goodwill is an earning power concept in which its value is an approximation equal to the discounted present value of future earnings that would exceed normal industry earnings. Goodwill is recognized as an intangible asset when it is acquired through a purchase of an existing company. Its value is determined by the excess of the total fair value above the fair value of distinguishable net assets. Amortization of goodwill is

As the business environment grows and companies find new ways to expand into their respective - or even new – markets, it is important that reporting standards stay up to date with changes and continue to assist companies in providing their users with useful accounting information. Information is labelled as being useful when it meets the

As per your request of an analysis of the following topics: Adjusting lower of cost or market inventory on valuation, Capitalizing interest on building construction, Recording gain or loss on asset disposal, and Adjusting goodwill for impairment. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) established clear guidelines addressing the items mentioned above. I will outline that FASB generally accepted accounting standards (GAAP) affect each area, and how these improvements to the company will benefit the company’s financial health (FASB, 2010).

Both the boards delivered quite some aspect of the project but a converged standard could not be achieved. Due to lack of enough support in terms of difference in jurisdiction and regulatory environment, the IASB and FASB could not work together and IASB decided to go with the forward looking impairment model. The board proposed the applicability of expected credit loss model to the financial instruments which are subject to impairment accounting.