Changing a Qualitative Research Into a Quantitative Study

In this article participants were given written and verbal information about the study and confidentiality, anonymity and withdrawal were reassured. All participants were fully informed and consented. Moreover, as the participant for this design is to permit the participants to ‘open up’ and discuss their experiences. It is crucial that any given time the participant should be permitted to discontinue with the interview if they feel uncomfortable. This is called as process consent, whereby the interview continuously negotiates with the interviewee to determine whether they are comfortable in continuing with the interview, (Polit and Beck, 2006). There are many ethical aspects to consider, the above is just one fraction used as an example, by simply suggesting that ethical guidelines were adhered to, does not illustrate ethical consideration. They did not show how to make the participant safe if they were difficult to manage.

To ensure the proposed study is academically, professionally, and ethically sound, researchers shall complete a risk assessment on the proposed method (participants, materials and design) of the study. This risk assessment will form the basis of the application to Swinburne University’s Research Ethics Office for ethical review. This application will address the risks identified with the participants used, including recruitment and informed consent, as well as data and publication arrangements.

The purpose of this paper is to critique a quantitative study and to present a critical analysis on its research findings. The paper will discuss the elements influencing believability and robustness of research, including writing style, research problem, literature review, conceptual framework, research question, hypothesis, study sample, methods, data analysis and results, and discussion of the relevance and future directions.

Quantitative and qualitative research generates from two different perspectives, and it provide different types of crucial information from the research subject. Qualitative research corresponds more with comprehensive and thorough descriptions of events, whereas quantitative research creates statistical models to explain events. Several advantages and disadvantages in qualitative and quantitative research, depends upon the researcher's purpose and area of focus and information that will answer those research questions (Creswell, (2013).

Our study will comply with standard ethical research procedures. We will obtain informed consent from our participants before they participate in our study. Our potential participants will be fully informed about what will happen during our study; in addition, they will understand the effects that our study will have on them and our research (Grinnell, Unrau, and Williams, 2014). We will not use bribery, deception, threats, or any other forms of coercion in order to gain participants for our study. The physical/emotional safety of the participants will come before the research; therefore, we will adhere to all ethical research procedures.

IRB protects the rights of all human subjects. The researcher complied with all IRB standards and requirements to ensure there was no harm to the participants as a result of their participation in the study. Informed consent forms were used to advise the participants of the purpose of the study, determine eligibility, and/or decline involvement. At the bottom of the informed consent form each participant was asked to sign, granting permission to interview and extract facts about them regarding mentoring African American women in higher education. Moreover, while conducting the interviews, each participant identity was protected by coding the interviews of the study contributors. The option to stop the research was available at any given

IRB is an administrative body established by UNT to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects enrolled in research. They review the research if it is conducted using any UNT employees or students as subjects, using UNT’s non-public information to identify or contact human research subjects, and research conducted by UNT employee or student in connection with their UNT responsibilities or studies. The IRB has the right to approve or disapprove all the modifications needed for research. It reviews all IRB applications and approves the research if criteria are met. IRB will review the applications for completeness, minimizing risks to subjects, ensuring voluntary participation, verifying the selection of subjects is equitable,

This study will not be anonymous as it requires us to collect names for the purpose of completing this research. For the purpose of this study, information will remain confidential. To ensure confidentiality, Non-involving persons or agencies will not have access to information collected to ensure confidentiality.

These conditions may affect the generalizability of the study, therefore qualitative research has considered has low population validity (Carr 1994). Moreover, Al-busaidi in 2008 asserted that statistical representativeness is not taken into consideration as a prime requirement and is not commonly sought. As a result, qualitative data collection is inefficiency in time and

For a quantitative study I chose the topic of moral distress. The title of this study is “Exploring the Moral Distress of Registered Nurses” authored by Patti Rager Zuzelo.

A number of key terms describe the system of ethical considerations that the modern research establishments have set up to protect the rights of research subjects. Voluntary participation and confidentiality are principles that demands that the respondents to be free from coercion in any way when participating in the research, protected in the raw data, and published

There are strengths and weaknesses within each qualitative methodology. Qualitative research within the nursing environment deals with people / patients feelings, beliefs, cultures and past experiences. The strengths that come from dealing with the above are an increased empathy of nurses towards their patient's holistic care (Schneider et al 2004). Weakness found within qualitative research according to Schneider et al (2004) can be linked to poor research questions, inappropriate method used, inaccurate data collection and analysis.

Forty surveys were completed successfully which resulted in very conclusive answers. Before conducting the survey all ethical guidelines were followed: a disclaimer was placed at the start of the survey informing participants that all information will remain confidential; the participants privacy will be respected; there will be no lasting harm and the participants will know this is entirely voluntary as the participant has the freedom to refuse or withdraw at any time without

Ethical Considerations: This study was reviewed and approved by La Salle University Institutional Review Board.  Furthermore, the researchers clearly specified how informed consent and confidentiality was handled in the field of study.  “Participants in the study received a written

Qualitative and Quantitative study designs both can be beneficial in research design. They both provide valuable options for researchers in the field. These techniques can either be used separately in a research study or they can be combined to achieve maximum information. This paper will define the terms qualitative and quantitative; describe the similarities and differences between each; discuss how qualitative and/or quantitative research designs or techniques could be used in the evaluation of my proposed research; and discuss why linking analysis to study design is important.