Chapter 1 Qualitative Research Paper Sample

(Doc 3) and (Doc 5).

The CDC estimates that each year, more than eight million people are diagnosed, and consequently died from cancer, and this statistic was even higher in the 1950s. During this period, little was known of cancer’s effects on the

The purpose of this essay is to review the

In this paper, I will be discussing my tentative topic that will include my dissertation research problem statement along with the purpose statement of my dissertation. I will also include the method of research, which will state the quantitative and qualitative methods. I will list who are the potential study participants and the research question. This paper will also entail the theories and element that support them. I will weigh the viability of the dissertation study and explain my degree and specialization.

The aim of this essay is to critically appraise one of the research articles and reflect on what is good

A. Explain how your own perceptions about quality of life and health promotion might affect your care for a dying patient with a lingering illness such as cancer My perceptions about quality of life are that every one lives with happiness and enjoyment in a health way not only on physical but also on mental. Happiness and enjoyment of life may be various, because different people have their unique expectation about their lives to meet their defined happiness and enjoyment based one their own education, culture, religion and experience. Those factors affect their satisfaction in some degree about their lives. To be simple, quality of life is to live with healthy, emotional and social wellbeing (Quigley and Watts Ltd).

There is no universally accepted definition for quality of life but it incorporates the individual’s subjective view of a broad range of clinical, functional, and personal aspects. Researchers have developed two types of quality of life assessments. The first is health related quality of life (HRQOL), which assesses the client’s perception of how their health status affects their physical, psychological, and social functioning, and well-being. The assessment is based on a series of questions the client is asked. The second type is the overall quality of life (OQOL), which focuses on the client’s satisfaction with life in general, not just in relation to the limitations of functioning that are related to disease. According to Laudet (2011), “One influential definition of OQOL drafted by the World Health Organization (WHO) is an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to there goals, expectations, standards and concerns” (WHOQOL Group, 1995, para. 5). The standard for measuring OQOL is the WHO quality of life instrument, which assesses the client’s perception of how they are functioning objectively. The subjective views obtained by QOL measures are important because they offer a better perspective to the

This essay intends to critique and analyse the research paper, in order to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the research undertaken. Certain questions are required to ensure that the evaluation is assessing the essential components of the research (Holloway& Wheeler, 2002). Therefore Holloway and

E.P. Thompson devotes a whole chapter to its discussion. Though the two monographs occur in

One model to address the need for early and ongoing assessment and intervention for cancer treatment associated side effects is the PSM. Stout et al. (2012) applied the model constructs to the physical rehabilitation and exercise components of cancer care, to include survivorship care. By

For instance, the value of an intervention in an aggressive cancer with a high mortality rate is perhaps best measured by short-term outcomes, whereas the value of an intervention in an indolent cancer with high survivability should be assessed based on long-term endpoints. To further complicate this discussion, consider an indolent cancer in patients with multiple co-morbidities, should shorter-term outcomes be used to gauge true value in this patient population? The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the NCI Cancer Outcomes Measurement Working Group (COMWG) have emphasized measuring clinical and patient-centered endpoints to assess the quality of cancer

Nineteen consented patients were assessed both subjectively and objectively using medical records, palliative care assessment form with the Australian Modified Karnofsky Performance Scale (AKPS), the symptom assessment scale (SAS), the problem severity score (PSS) and the Resource Utilisation Groups -Activities of Daily Living Scale (RUG-ADLs), in addition,

Bonaccio, et.al. (2013) define health-related quality of life (HRQL) as, “An individual’s subjective evaluation of his own health and well-being,” adding that this self-reported measure has become an important predictor for

The content of the section was reviewed by the authors, from which a number of observations were made.

Bibliographic information: Richard C. Cardoso & Peter J. Gerngross & Theresa M. Hofstede & Donna M. Weber & Mark S. Chambers. Support Care Cancer (2014) 22:259–267 DOI 10.1007/s00520-013-1960-y.