preview

Character Analysis Of King Henry V

Decent Essays

King Henry is one of the most successful kings of England. He brought two warring kingdoms crashing together, and melded them into one united country. Henry is an extremely interesting and dynamic character. From a young age he associated with criminals, drunkards, and other lowly citizens. When his father was on his deathbed, he requested that Henry stopped being a criminal, and begin acting like a king. Henry made that oath, and stayed true to it until his dying day.

As a king, he became a king after being a criminal. He went from a criminal prince to an upstanding kind king who understands justice and follows the righteous path for the rest of his life. It is such a crazy transformation; from criminal hiding crimes from the king to …show more content…

Directly after that event, he judges three people to death for attempting treason. Reasons like this are the reason Henry progresses the story as the main protagonist. He is the main driving force that is pushing the plotline forward. Every time he is in a scene he enhances it, and brings the act more color and flare.

While Henry does adapt his ways often, he doesn't always change. One of the examples of him sticking to old ways is how he is a religious man. Early in the story, he listens to the Archbishop, and starts this war because of him. The Archbishop is the prophet of god, which correlates with being a pious person. The English win the Battle of Agincourt in an astounding manner; only losing less than 30 men while the French lost 10,000 men. He decides the reason behind them winning the battle God's will. Another example of this is his choice to end people's lives.

Henry V is a man of God, which is again shown on the eve of the Battle of Agincourt when he is talking with his men. One of his men wishes they had more men fighting, yet Henry wishes the opposite. If God has chosen them to lose this battle then more men would die. On the

other hand, if God had chosen them to win, extra men wouldn't be needed, so they can use those extra men to suppress the Scottish rebellion.

Henry doesn't blame always blame the innocents for others crimes either. There is an example in which Henry V has no quarrel with the innocent. The time arrives when

Get Access