Characteristics Of Autocratic Leadership

The theory of leaders can be autocratic, a person who doesn’t consider the person undertaking the task only getting the results. A democratic leader takes opinions of the staff and understands how they believe the best results can be achieved, whereas Laissez-faire style leaves the experienced staff to implement the work processes.

Tenets of servant leaders include: the ability to listen with understanding and keep an open mind, hear without judgement, can deal with ambiguity and complex issues, provides clear goals and directions, uses honesty, and has vision (Marquis & Huston, 2014). The laissez-faire leadership style in contrast to the servant leadership style is a nondirected leadership style with little or no control, and decision making is dispersed throughout the group, which can lead to apathy among the staff and frustration (Marquis & Huston,

Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. It can also be derived

Autocratic Approach: Autocratic leadership gives a positive belief about the updates about any policies. However this kind of approach is not highly regarded by many of the working environments. This is due to the amendments being brought into use prematurely for the uses to access them. This approach of leadership and management may be viewed as being too authoritative.

Authoritarian leaders are the leaders who like to do all the group decisions on their own and tell other group members what to do and how to do it. This type of leadership is very beneficial when you are in need of a quick decision or faced with some type of crisis. This type of decision making can easily be abused and can often be viewed as being bossy and over controlling. Leaders who use this style may provoke dependence, criticism, dissatisfaction, and aggression from their group members (Forsyth, 1990). According to Gladding 2012, authoritarian leaders do not ask for consideration or suggestions from group members; instead, they structure and direct their groups according to their own wishes, purposes, and the information available to them. A task group could benefit more from an Authoritarian leader. Tasks groups focus on accomplishing specific goals. According to Gladding 1994, “with task groups, an

Autocratic leadership, is a style which is characterized by the individual control over all the decisions and little input from group members. These type of leaders rarely accept advice from followers. These type of leaders tend to be bossy and controlling. Failing to consult with other team members in such situations hurts the overall success of the group.

There are many different examples of leadership qualities in the Lord of The Flies, shown by Ralph and Jack. Ralph was one we could call “for the people”, however Jack was the opposite, only looking out for himself. Ralph is made a strong democratic leader in the book, who listens, and cares about all the boys, while Jack is a strong autocratic leader, who doesn’t care and will not listen to the other boys. Not asking or taking any input from group members, making sole decisions, not letting group members participate in important tasks, and the leaders dictating the work, all these are examples of characteristics of autocratic leadership style. This leadership style can be beneficial in the sense of making quick decisions, because autocratic

Authoritarian leaders give clear orders to what should be done and are straight to the point. They settle on choices with no contribution from others. An Authoritarian leader would be for example an Officer as a part of the armed force, they are for the most part bossy,comanding and intimidating to some they think they are constantly right and they're way is the most ideal way. This could be utilized as a part of a circumstance where a group needs to do things quick and successfully e.g in a drugs raid, if the unit is under attack the leader must yell orders and the group must react quick as their life is at stake. This style is like Task Orientated in the way that the leader is the main individual who puts input, this doesn't make a welcoming

Autocratic leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute control over a group.

The dictionary defines autocratic as, “pertaining to or of the nature of autocracy or of an autocrat; absolute.” Absolute being the keyword, meaning that the leader’s words are absolute for every follower regardless of personal opinion. This is the style typically used in the military and it follows a leadership pattern where there is a chain of command and a top down structure for which information is processed and passed. Originally developed in 1939, a group of researchers led by Kurt Lewin analyzed how groups are formed and their leaders. The researchers broke schoolchildren up into three groups to complete a craft project lead by a leader from each of the three different leadership styles. They found that autocratic leaders tended to make decisions independently of other children. Additionally they found that, “Autocratic leaders [tended to] make decisions themselves. They do not consult their followers, or involve them in the decision-making process. Having made a decision they impose it and expect obedience” (272). Therefore, this can been seen often in police administration where the chief makes the decisions and his subordinates follow them. A perfect example of an autocratic leader and the dangers that are associated with that would be WW2 German leader Adolf

An autocratic leadership involves a leader who holds complete authority. That means that he/she makes the decisions. So the followers have no input or influence whatsoever. For instance, countries such as Cuba and North Korea operate under the autocratic leadership style.

Autocratic leadership is a classical leadership style with the following characteristics: manager seeks to make as many decisions as possible, manager seeks to have the most authority and control in decision making, manager seeks to retain responsibility rather than utilise complete delegation , consultation with other colleagues in minimal and decision making becomes a solitary process managers are less concerned with investing their own leadership development, and prefer to simply work on the task at hand. Whereas Democratic Leadership is the leadership style that promotes the sharing of responsibility, the exercise of delegation and continual consultation. The style has the following characteristics: manager seeks consultation on all

The laissez-faire leadership style can be seen by some as lazy or a type of leadership style where the leader is non-existent. A leader who uses the laissez-faire leadership style is backing away from the traditional idea of a manager or leader, and allowing the employees to make decisions or tackle problems on their own. The laissez-faire leadership style was developed in 1938 in compilation with both autocratic and democratic leadership styles. This leadership style is best when the workforce is made up of very educated and highly skilled individuals who are capable of developing and meeting their own deadlines.

Laissez faire is the absence of effective leadership (Yukl G, 2010). Laissez faire leaders ignore problems and follower (Yukl G, 2010) and they do not contribute to the growth of the follower ( (Northouse, 2007). Feedback, rewards and leader involvement are totally absent in this type of leadership hence reduced organisational commitment.

The last style is called laissez-faire leadership. Here leader usually participates minimally and let team members find their own way out by allowing complete freedom in decision making (Simmons and Striley, 2014).