Charging Juveniles As Adults

Good Essays
Charging Juveniles as Adults (Peer Review)
In the United States, “an estimated 7,100 juvenile defendants were charged with felonies in adult criminal court in 1998” ("Juvenile Defendants"). These numbers portray how there were a lot of juveniles being charged. In addition to a large increase in the amount of crime, there was a change in the severity of the crimes that were committed, “the number of violent crimes committed by young people declined substantially from the 1990s to 2003, but then surged again that year, with the estimated number of juvenile murder offenders increasing 30 percent” (Kahn). These numbers show how juveniles were committing more crimes that were serious in the face of the law. These numbers are a brief snippet of
…show more content…
But change that to an eight year old boy and his friends, and everyone’s opinion changes. They want to coddle the children and blame the violence on the parents, video games or social media. How does one word, juvenile, change the world’s mind so quickly-because it is in human’s nature to care for the young. People see children as clay to be melded into the perfect model of a person. When these children do something bad, they see the molder to be at fault. It is like they have they never seen a child misbehave when they are “molded” well. Children have their own brains and ideas. These ideas are their own and they are not only based on others in lives. The important thing is to see that juveniles are not children, “In the words of one 'get-tough' advocate, juvenile offenders are criminals who happen to be young, not children who happen to be criminal’” (ABC News). This perfectly sums up what juvenile crime is. It is not about the child, it is about the victim. If a juvenile is capable of committing a crime and planning it out, they should be tried for it. In one case, a boy murdered a woman after breaking into her house and her seeing his face. Instead of acting innocent, he was proud of what he had done, “Simmons wasn’t modest about what he had done; to the contrary, he had…show more content…
They say that children are not adults and should never be treated like they are. They say that it is not only about the court but also about other elements, “when you have somebody as young as 15, this shouldn't just be decided arbitrarily by a district attorney but by a judge in a hearing hopefully informed by experts in adolescent psychology and psychiatry” (Kriesberg). They also talk about how even more importantly brain development continues into a person’s twenties. They say that a child does not have the brain capability to be judged for what they have done (ABC News). However, there have been other studies that show that mid to late teens do perform just as well on some test as adults (Beckman). Even more there is the fact that if they argue that a juvenile’s brain is not developed enough to be charged for what they have done. Does that mean they believe that a juvenile is not capable of committing a terrible crime either? This doesn’t have any legitimacy because there are multiple cases of juveniles committing terrible crimes and understanding what they have done.
No matter their age, when it comes to serious offenses juveniles should be tried as adults because the understanding of what is right and wrong is known by young children, if they have the ability to commit a crime they should be charged as adults, and without them being trying
Get Access