preview

Charles Baudelaire And The Painter Of Modern Life

Good Essays

From both the reading, Charles Baudelaire in 'The Painter of Modern Life,' and T. S. Eliot in 'Tradition and the Individual Talent', we see a kind of difficult and laborious relation to the present. We are to compare and contrast the two essayists' different approaches to the task of the present. Both the essayists’, in their writing, have one thing in common which is tradition. But first what comes to a persons mind when they think about tradition. What is tradition? Why is it important? How does it have an effect on our everyday lives. So lets start with a definition of the word ‘tradition’ it is a belief or behavior that has been passed down within a group or society with symbolic meaning or special significance with …show more content…

S. Eliot in 'Tradition and the Individual Talent' divides his essay into three parts. The first part tells the reader about his concept of tradition, and in the second part is developed his theory of the impersonality of poetry. The short, third part is in the nature of a conclusion, or summing up of the whole discussion. The essay shows Eliot's views on the relation between traditional and individual talent The writer has started his essay by saying that tradition is usually regarded as a term to show disapproval. It is a word which is considered disagreeable to the English ears. People praise a poet on his work when it is seen as being unique and original. He believes that the poet is being praised for the wrong thing as according to him the best and the most individual part of a poet’s work is that which shows the greatest influence of the past. As quoted in the text “Whereas if we approach a poet without this prejudice, we shall often find that not only the best, but the most individual part of his work may be those in which the dead poets, his ancestors, assert their immortality most …show more content…

Charles Baudelaire begins his essay by giving us information of an artist whom he refers to as M.G. He tells us about the artists nature and actions. We are told about M.G’s uniqueness, humility, his lack of need for the approval from others, his wish to be unidentified, a person who does not have hidden intentions and his obsession with a world of images. M.G. does not put his signature on any of his pieces because the author claims that even without his signature you can tell it was created by him as he says “all his works are signed with his dazzling

Get Access