Charlotte Mourad: Founder And President Of Earth Club

Language is powerful and can evoke guilt, fear, admiration, and joy. At times, however, emotional language has a negative effect when the author uses words that seem to disrespect or guilt the audience. In Gary Steiner’s essay “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable,” Steiner debates that veganism is the only acceptable lifestyle because it does not endanger the lives of animals. Although Steiner clearly explains his firm stance, he uses a disdainful tone when relating personal struggles that ultimately disconnects the audience. Steiner does not relate and does not effectively prove veganism would end all animal suffering. Instead of discussing the advantages of veganism in an objective manner, Steiner’s tone comes across as arrogant and fails to create

a vegetarian for the past four years. Her personal nutrition habits and values can be attributed to her favorable stance towards plant-based diets. The essay’s context is set in the middle of the rising veganism fads popularized by celebrities and mainstream media. As a student, Breslaw’s main audience are her fellow peers, professors and those concerned with lessening their carbon

In the short story of Margaret Lundberg ‘’Eating Green’’ Margaret has grown up being a vegetarian because her mother fed up with healthy foods, that included vegies in her meal and plain yogurt for breakfast. As the time passed by, she became a mother and transported a vegetarian diet to her family as well as she was accustomed to its lifestyle. Margaret had realized that if everyone becomes a vegan it could make a huge impact and contribute to benefit on saving the planet we live on. The purpose of the argument is to encourage others to consider taking a vegetarian diet; It will likely reduced badly effects in our health. By considering/ taking in mind a vegetarian diet it could decrease the percent of people suffering from obesity, diabetes,

We researched extensively about food and how it is researching our plates. It was while doing this that I read more and more discussions on veganism and vegetarianism. While I found veganism very appealing ethics-wise I realised I couldn't actually implement it. The vegan substitutes were very costly and rarely available where I lived. The only real problem I had with vegetarianism was dairy farms and how they treated the animals. So, I found a simpler solution; Instead of trying to convince my ultra-conservative parents (whom I live with) to change their lifestyles so drastically, I could simply request them to buy the milk we need from local farmers who were known to treat their animals well. This made me feel better about having milk products and it was a step forward to making my life as violence free as

She cites a 2008 Carnegie Mellon University study, for example, to state how not eating red meat and diary just one day of the week can achieve just as much in greenhouse gas reductions as simply just eating local, organic food. Her argument though does suffer a bit when she begins to talk about the morality and ethics of eating meat. She doesn't back up her assertions with too many facts at this point and mainly uses her opinion at times as enough justification. Her mentioning of humane meat being an oxymoron and how it weighs on the consciences of its advocates seems to be more of her own drawn conclusions than a fact. Nonetheless, she presents her points

To eat or not to eat, is that really the question? One devoted rancher/essayist, Linda Hasselstrom, confronts this very idea in her essay from the book, 80 Readings for Composition. The piece was written in 1991, titled “The Cow versus the Animal Rights Activist,” during a time when ranchers and the meat industry were under fire by both animal activists for the inhumane treatment of cattle and by environmentalists for the immense amounts of energy waste and pollution. Hasselstrom uses pertinent substance, though sometimes bias, to shed light on the misconceptions about ranchers and their place in the cattle industry. She aims to unite the concerns of the activists on the side of the ranchers so they can work together

Over fifty-six billion animals are slaughtered yearly for consumption, but because we are conditioned from a young age to view animals as resources, we neglect that they are passionate and intelligent living beings. Cows want to enjoy their lives, pigs want to enjoy their lives, and many other farm animals want to enjoy their lives but instead are abused and confined in small cages. Ironically, though, when someone does likewise to a cat or dog, they’re prosecuted. The sole solution to these inhumane acts is Veganism. Veganism is the ideal diet because plant-based foods are plentiful, and it recognizes the unethical treatment of animals.

In 2011, American filmmaker, Marisa Miller Wolfson, made a 76-minute documentary titled, ‘Vegucated.’ Wolfson, a practicing vegan, cites her research on foods and especially animal-based foods as her rationale for opting to go vegan. Notably, upon going vegan, she became healthier, lost weight, and even felt happier because she was no longer contributing to the inhuman treatment of animals. In her quest to become a vegan, Wolfson made the film after moving to New York City. Her concurrent idea in the film is the effects of animal diets versus the effects of vegan diets. Evidently, through its participants, the film illustrates that avoidance of animal products results to weight loss and

Hasselstrom, Linda. "The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 327-34. Print.

You may know Cassandra Corbit as just a normal senior at Fivay High School, but did you know that she was a vegetarian? No surprise that the dog lover wouldn't dare touch a slab of meat, but that's not the reason why there's no beef in her diet. "I didn't change for the animals," Corbit explains. "It was just a bonus."

There were a few high school students. They were all in this friend group and close with each other and accepting no matter where they were in the social hierarchy.Penelope, Holly , Finn, Ramona,Daniel,Brody were all best friends. They would all hang out with each other and look out for one another. But that wasn’t the only thing about them that was unique. They were all animals-Penelope the Pig, Holly the Horse, Finn the Frog, Ramona the Rabbit, Daniel the Dog, and Brody the Bear. Holly and Brody both have never been bullied, and never been judged despite having cerebral palsy and down syndrome.

In this article, Bob Barker is explained on a more personal level demonstrating his dedication and association with animal rights and his personal foundation, D J & T Foundation. He clarifies his love for animals since he was a child walking home looking for dogs and cats with his mother; Mr. Barker says his transformation into an animal rights activist was gradual and he soon learned the horrible conditions animals were enduring. He and his late wife changed a part of their lifestyle by both becoming vegetarians because of the growing concern for the animals; however, his regimen of no meat, fowl, fish, or dairy products did not prevent surgery to relieve a blockage on his left carotid artery. While in bed recovering, Bob creates a bill that

Animal cruelty continues to plague the meat and dairy industry and a policy to reverse this is enacting stricter regulations on meat and dairy labels that explicitly state the additives and preservatives used on the product. Moreover, my policy will persuade people to purchase meat and dairy that is ethically raised and is not made with preservatives or additives, this is my value of health. Moreover, my policy is for those who eat meat and dairy and are unaware of the health side affects of consuming it and the animal cruelty that goes into producing a piece of meat or glass of milk, which encompasses my value of compassion. We are a compassionate species who turns the channel during an ASPCA commercial. We root for Nemo, Babe and Bambi yet we watch the movie whilst eating fish, pork or venison. The hypocrisy is unbelievable yet not talked about. Most Americans do not recognize this link between our compassion and the animals we eat and the hypocrisy that surrounds it. In this essay I address the compassion humans posses and how it is being wiped out through eating meat and dairy. I also address how we have the potential to rid the meat and dairy industry of the abuse. I will also discuss how meat and dairy is detrimental to our health.

As different crazes and fads are appearing each day, we have come to expect them to simply fade away as the hype passes. However, veganism has stood the test of time in our fad society and is still increasing in popularity. Originally only thought to be a religious lifestyle, many people from different walks of life are becoming vegans. However, this poses many questions and sparks heated debates, mainly from omnivorous people who believe that veganism is against life’s natural order. Vegans, then, argue against an omnivorous lifestyle by bringing up facts about humans’ biological makeup and how humans are, contrary to popular belief, herbivorous by nature, not omnivorous. While both sides present good arguments to some, the veganism lifestyle contains more benefits and less harmful cons than an omnivorous lifestyle.

In “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable,” Gary Steiner argues against the eating, or using, of animals and animal products. Steiner is the author of multiple books on topics similar to this, and a dedicated vegan of fifteen years at the time of this article. The author begins with an allusion to the recent outcries for the humane treatment of animals being raised for food. However, he points out, no one seems to be concerned about the animals being slaughtered, merely that they were not abused beforehand. Steiner then goes on to explain the two main