Charter Advantages

This charter means that everyone no matter what race, religion, sex, national origin, age or mental and physical abilities they have they are protected. The charter allows people to have basic human fundamental rights that most government rules and regulations were restricting before it came into act. The freedom of speech, religion and to associate yourself with whoever you want are just some of those rights that are being offered with the entrenchment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Finally the last achievements that Pierre Trudeau did that assisted in making Canada better are the legalization of laws on abortion, homosexuality and lotteries.

Signed in 1982, it is what we have based our government and laws around. It contains many provisions that allow us the freedoms we use everyday and sometimes take for granted. Individual rights make up the largest part of it and are promises made by the government of what we have the right to do. The Charter includes fundamental freedoms such as, freedom of speech and freedom of peaceful assembly. It also included a plethora of other rights as well, like the right to enter and leave the country freely. It also dictates how some parts of the government should be run, like when parliament must meet. While many other countries do not have the same rights and freedoms we have, this helps our quality of life. In the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, there are also collective rights for our First Nations and heritage groups. Furthermore, Canadians quality of life is improved and they are protected with the Charter of Rights and freedoms and everything inside of

The entrenchment of rights in the Canadian Constitution comes after long experience with a system of parliamentary supremacy. The American judicial tradition of treating the written constitution as fundamental law cannot have an instant Canadian counterpart. Thus, it does not follow that the Canadian courts will necessarily claim a role comparable to that of courts in the United States, nor is it clear that the representative bodies in Canada would tolerate such a judicial assertion of power. Opposition by government bodies to the Charter have already occurred in Canada, where the Parti Quebecois government of Quebec invoked the “notwithstanding the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms” clause for the purpose of protecting their language laws from attack under the charter. This report will attempt to note some of the common and distinctive features of the text of the two constitutions as well as to how they differ.

One of the most misinterpreted aspects of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the freedom of expression. Group organizations have misused this much too often. In the past, many extremist groups have misused this right to protect themselves. A great example is the Westboro Baptist Church. This church is one of the many groups across North America that uses the Charter to protect themselves. The Charter protects them even though their actions and messages are harmful and not beneficial to society. If the Charter was to recognize these groups as dangerous, they wouldn’t have the chance to misuse these freedoms. Also, the fact that if a Canadian citizen were to use the excuse of the freedom of expression to defend their actions, they wouldn’t

Laura Barnett (2011, July) claims that freedom of religion on this charter is figuratively indicating that government of Canada plays a neutral role in the case of religious freedom and its major concern is to accredit the supremacy of none of religions over each other while it preserves the relationship between church and state. This means that all of religions are respected the same by the government and people have freedom of religions in all kind. For instance, activists of all religions like Islam, Jew, Buddha and others have lots of religious activities

Every Canadian citizen can enjoy living in a country today where everyone has equal rights and freedom. Canadians today have many rights and freedoms that they take for granted. The rights and freedoms we have today were only made possible are many struggles that people in the past have faced. Various groups, specifically, Chinese workers, African Canadians, natives and women dealt with discrimination daily. Their battle for equal rights and freedoms amongst everyone has contributed greatly to the development of our nation to what it is today.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is without a doubt one of Canada’s most important section entrenched in the Canadian Constitution. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights enacted into the Canadian Constitution as part of the Canada Act in 1982. However, the Charter was Canada’s second attempt to protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens all throughout the country and on every level of government. The Canadian Bill of Rights, which preceded the Charter was enacted in 1960. However, being only a federal statute rather than a full constitutional document, it had no power and application to provincial laws. In addition, the Supreme Court of Canada only narrowly interpreted the Bill of Rights, therefore rarely unlawful laws were declared inoperative and continued to exist. As a result, the ineffectiveness of the Bill of Rights led to many movements to improve the protection of rights and freedoms in Canada. However, similar to its predecessor, the Charter is not without faults, and loopholes. In some cases, it has even infringed upon certain liberties and democratic rights and freedoms. In other cases, the Charter has incited conflicts between liberty and democracy and raised questions that speculate whether it is truly democratic.

Collective rights are what makes Canada uniquely different from the other countries. These rights have grown more equal over time to shape Canada to become a fair and equitable governed society. Collective rights are rights given to specific groups for historical and constitutional reasons for groups such as the First Nations, Inuit, Francophones and Anglophones. As great as it sounds, back in Canadian history back when collective rights were just starting off as treaties and laws, First Nations and the Metis were faced with assimilation. Francophones and Anglophones were given collective educational rights when put in a minority setting. Without collective rights shifting to become better, historical groups who found Canada would have either

Apart from the other laws in Canada’s constitution, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an important law that affects every Canadian’s rights and freedoms. It was created in 1981 by former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau to provide legal protection for the most important rights and freedoms. These rights include fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, and legal rights. Most but not all articles included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are protected in the constitution. However, if a Canadian feels that their rights are violated, they can challenge laws and unfair actions using the justice system. In my opinion, I believe the Canadian Charter of Human Rights somewhat protects Canadians’ rights and

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was signed into law by Queen Elizabeth II April 17, 1982. Often referred to as the Charter, it affirms the rights and freedoms of Canadians in the Constitution of Canada. The Charter encompasses fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, language rights and equality rights. The primary function of the Charter is to act as a regulatory check between Federal, Provincial and Territorial governments and the Canadian people. Being a successor of the Canadian Bill of Rights that was a federal statute, amendable by Parliament, the Charter is a more detailed and explicit constitutional document that has empowered the judiciary to render regulations and statutes at both the

It may also include a charter of fundamental rights. And fundamental and inalienable and inviolable right. In other words, the constitution guarantees everyone the respect of the rights: it is necessary to guarantee the fundamental rights of citizens. It poses, for example, the principle of the equality of citizens, the universal suffrage ( Voting rights granted to all citizens of age) the source of legitimacy and allows everyone to have his case heard by an independent tribunal. A constitution is an instrument that must fights against arbitrariness by allowing all citizens freedom. Thus violating the freedom of people right is legitimately unacceptable level of government action although politics

The primary viewpoint of the Charter was the dominance of the rights and the fairness of the judicial system. Two related Charter rights complimented this case: the right to counsel under s. 10(b) and the right against self-incrimination under s. 11(c). In addition, as mentioned earlier, the right remain silent was an issue. Majority found that these rights granted Hebert right to be free of coercion by the police, but also the right to choose whether or not to give a statement.

Yes, the Charter does apply to this case. Sections of the charter which apply to this case include freedom of expression and equality rights. These sections apply due to the fact that this case is about a group of students from the University of Calgary who were disciplined for freely expressing their opinions of their professor on a social network called Facebook. In other words, this case involves these students’ freedom of expression. In addition, equality rights apply since this university involved in the case argues that the Charter does not apply to universities. This demonstrates that there is an inequality between universities and other citizens. Therefore, the equality rights section of the Charter is in concern with this case as well.

Justin Trudeau spoke to the political risks of this charter; he says that the PQ has miscalculated her expectations of what Quebecers will respond to. It is a significant factor in the process, some people may comply with this secular change and some will fight back against the

The Charter 8 documents seems like many we have seen throughout time. But to think that people still doesn't have these basic rights is insane. The fundamental principals of the Chapter 8 document are freedom, human rights, equality, republicanism, democracy and constitutional rule. These seem pretty similar to our own declaration of independence. We wanted all these same things from our repressive monarchy regime. They wanted to freedom of speech, press, assembly, association, where to live, to strike, demonstrate and protest. All rights we have and take for granted. They also advocated for these things in the Chapter 8 document. They also wanted each person to be born with rights to dignity and freedom. Which you can find in any western document.