Charter Schools: A Case Study

Public education has had a negative effect on students; it’s often because of the bigger class sizes, poor test scores, and high crime in the surrounding areas. Public schools need to revise their system to determine what’s the best fit for their student’s educational needs. All children who live in a school district have a right to attend a district school. Many parents would like more options and opportunities for their child, and would like to be involved in their child’s education. Charter schools are part of the answer for a better educational choice for children’s academic achievement. Charter schools have many successful methods and continue to pave the way for children’s education needs .

There are a number of ways that charter schools give parents greater individual control over their childrens’ education. No longer is a child bound to attend a particular school based on the geographical location of his or her home. Parents have the freedom to select a charter school that they feel would best suit the needs of their children1. Parents also have a greater say in the affairs of charter schools compared to public schools. In many instances, parents serve on the “board of education” governing the charter school, a board whose context is determined by a school’s charter and not state law. This contrasts with the traditional public school board that is limited to seven members elected from the community-at-large, regardless of whether board members have children in school. Moreover, a charter school board is entirely occupied with the operations of just one school instead of an entire district. Charter school supporters argue that this leads to less bureaucracy and greater efficiency in creating school policy that ultimately benefits students.

There is a growing desire to establish additional charter schools in the state of Mississippi. Mississippi legislators are adamant about providing parents and students more choice. The debate over school choice has existed for years and there seems to be no end in sight. Proponents of charter schools believe parents should have freedom of choice in educating their children. They argue that all students deserve a quality education as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. Moreover, they contend that some communities have failing public schools that deprive students of a quality education. On the other hand, critics of charter schools believe they tend to discriminate against students in terms of race and religious background. There is growing concern

Gulf Coast Charter School would be the best middle school option because there are weekly field activities, technology education programs, and clubs and extracurricular activities. Gulf Coast will allow students to learn more about things that already interest them and help them to realize what they might want to be involved in during high school.

There are academic tutoring services in many African American urban schools across the country, along with districts that tailor their curriculum to fit the students. (Chapman, 2010, pp.651-654) Charter schools also offer a curriculum formatted toward the students and have more freedom from the bureaucratic echelon. There are only a small handful that have the same ideology or format as the Chicago study. The Chicago study gave students the benefits of learning social and business skills through BAM (Becoming A Man), a Youth Guidance program. This program is based on the premise that many urban youths lack general skills because they have not had a positive role model to guide them. Hence, the BAM program offers role models that are

Shober, Manna, & Witte (2006), examines how state policy makers incorporated flexibility and accountability into state charter school laws supplementing a particular database with others measures to answer two specific questions. (1) What factors influence the degree of flexibility and accountability in state charter schools laws? And (2) how does the content of state charter schools laws, and the different values those laws embrace, affect the formation of charter schools in the United States? In state charter school laws, it is shown that state political and contextual factors help account for the degree of flexibility, but not accountability. Therefore, it was suggested that an increase in changes in charter laws show favor reducing accountability

Charter schools are unique public schools that are allowed the freedom to be more innovative while being held accountable for advancing student achievement (what is a charter school 2017). Because they are public schools, they are open to all children; do not charge tuition; and do not have special entrance requirements. The core of the charter school model is the belief that public schools should be held accountable for student learning (what is a charter school 2017). In exchange for this accountability, school leaders should be given freedom to do whatever it takes to help students achieve and should share what works with the broader public school system so that all students benefit (what is a charter school

Charter schools have an interesting history with origins that are most often overlooked. Since the enactment of the first charter school legislation in Minnesota in 1991, charter schools have grown rapidly to over 6,000 in forty-two (42) states and the District of Columbia (Karp & Heitner, 2013; CREDO, 2013). Originally, charter schools were teacher-operated schools serving students struggling inside the traditional system (Karp & Heitner, 2013). Accordingly, charter schools were established to operate outside the reach of administrative bureaucracy and politicization among many city school boards (Karp & Heitner, 2013).

in Washington, and exploring the charter school issue through the lens of Race to the Top and

So what is a charter school? A charter school is a school where it is being funded by organizations, groups, teachers etc. And they are exempt from local rules and regulations. Some parents want their children to go to charter schools because of how successful charter schools have been with students who succeed in their academics. The thing is that you either have to test into that charter school or get picked by a lottery system. There is another side where some think that charter schools are not beneficial in ways that could jeopardize the community and their students. There are a lot of public schools but at the same time there are a number of charter schools that are growing. There are many reasons public schools could be great, and better

According to pro side of the debate, charter schools are necessary. Education is not always a ‘one size fits all’ (Genma Holmes). The neighborhood traditional public school is not necessary always the best environment for every child simply because traditional public schools are designed to meet the needs of the general population. However, charter schools provide students who do not fit in with the traditional public schooling system an alternative educational route. Dennis Jenkins believes that traditional public schools also have a monopoly over public education. As a result, these monopolies are not motivated to change and improve because of the lack of competition. Charter schools are the solution to this problem. They serve the purpose of encouraging public schools to compete for financial dollars, which spur positive changes across the board in public education.

Social, cultural, and political variables impact the lives of our children, including their development. One explores the socio-political reality of the Charter School Act of 1998 to our society. There are unwavering viewpoints in favor and staunch positions against the Act. The Charter School Act of 1998 created an antagonistic war of words concerning the direction of public education. Those in favor of the Act purport its favorable addition to public school education. Conversely, opponents argue that charter schools will ultimately privatize public education. Nonetheless, this paper seeks to provide historical background

After reading this article I am not a fan of charter schools, I think they are run by selfish people who only worry about their income. The schools have a different way of teaching. The charter schools are forcing public schools out of low income areas where they are truly needed because families can not afford private schools.

The credibility of the authors is first presented in the introduction as it states that the book is a result from three and a half years “of immersion in the world of charter schools . . .(3)” The authors first state an allegation against the enrollment of disabled students in charter schools, followed by a counterargument from the authors, and finished by supporting facts written by authorities on the subject. The authors first attack the belief that charters schools do not adequately serve disabled children; therefore not many parents choose charter schools for their disabled children. Then counter claim by asserting, “Charter schools are popular with those parents of disabled youngsters who have sought them out, often because such families want something distinct from the cumbersome procedures of conventional “special” education” (158). Immediately following their counterargument, they state the data from a Hudson Institute survey from parents that “two-thirds reported that their charter school’s curriculum and teaching are better than those of the school their child would otherwise be attending.” The organization of this section is not effective because there is a leap in the argument. The authors declare that disabled children are not being adequately served followed by a statement, which is on the other side of the spectrum, that charter schools are popular with parents of disabled students. The authors should have offered some leeway into the counterargument that could have gained greater credibility by captivating the audience first. In addition, the authors expand the counterargument by citing the U.S. Department of Education to support the claim that charter schools are popular for the disabled

Topic: Violation of the open-enrollment and teacher licensing statutes by Northern Ozaukee School District’s operation of a virtual charter school outside the district.