Charter Schools Vs. Magnet Schools

Imbalance is the main contributor in the growing epidemic in education in the United States of America. The education system in the United States is flawed. The center of attention of charter and private schools at its peak, whereas public schools are left to fall apart and leave millions of students uneducated. Everyone, every kid deserves the upmost love and dedication, no matter race, gender, or family financial state. Public schooling is set in place for students and families that can’t ill afford private schools or are denied entry into a charter school. These charter schools and private schools are now prioritized due to the fact that education is more rigorous and prepares students to succeed in college. Colleges are now more tended to choose a private or charter school student over a public school student.

Journal One in The Alternative by Galen Leonhardy, tells the story of a teacher who helps open an alternative school in Kozol Creek, Idaho, and the struggles he faces in attempting to implement a collaborative education process. The author writes of teachers who let students run free through the halls or simply ignored kids because they did not know how to handle them. He also writes of teachers who strive for a more personalized education by learning who their students are and understanding the environment from which they come. I have also dealt with both kinds of teachers in my educational experience, as I was a student of an alternative school. Mr. Lamar, to me, represents what a teacher should be. His personal dedication to making a difference in students’ lives and his willingness to go the extra mile by empowering students to take responsibility for their education changed how I perceived my own education. Mrs. Patton, on the other hand, is a teacher I would much rather forget. Her militarized style of teaching made learning an afterthought to the daily complications we encountered in the classroom. Both Mr. Lamar and Mrs. Patton taught me the importance of being included in your own education.

Are charter schools the right choice to the educational needs of our children? Charter schools are tuition free public schools created and operated by parents, organizations, and community groups to fill student’s educational needs. Charter schools consider educating their students as the priority, and identify how children’s learning needs are different from each other, so they came up with different ways on educating their students such as learning in small groups, or by participating in hands on learning. Along with their unique programs such as art, math, and science, charter schools are also the stronger academic choice for students. Parents should consider charter schools for their children’s

Two researchers, Dynarski and Gleason (1998), made an argument concerning dropout prevention programs, with the focus on the populations of alternative schools with a different perspective. They found that students labeled at risk in their programs also had other concerns such as high academic achievement and high expectations for their future. Alternative schools and programs have evolved through the years to address a variety of student issues from within and outside the school environment. While the definitions of current alternative school and programs are varied, several common characteristics are among the options currently in existence (Young. T 1990). The students within alternative school require a specific education program that will provide them with their best chance at success. Programs that include individualized, flexible plans with clear expectations, an emphasis on student personal care, and

Why choose to go to Charter School rather than public school? Charter schools are public school of choice, meaning families choose for their children. Federal legislation provides grants to help charters to manage start-up costs. They create better educational opportunities for the students therefore they have higher expectations in teaching. Charter Schools and zoned (public) schools are tuition free but unfortunately not everyone can get in to Charter school, since it works by lottery. Everyone has the opportunity to apply and has a choice to attend Charlet School if the students are lucky enough to get in. Charter schools are more effective for three reasons: they have higher graduation rates, teachers are more prepared and devoted to their students, and teachers take a greater responsibility for their students as they compete against Zoned Schools.

The first day of school is a rite of passage for most children. The step from home or day care to school is huge: they are a big kid now. However, sometimes the local Public School, especially in rural or economically challenged areas, can be an uncertain, questionable and scary place, and yet parents are expected to entrust them with their five or six year old child. Some years ago, when my daughter was ready to enter school, she and I had just such an experience, and we began to seriously search for an alternative school for her to attend. What we discovered was a Charter School: a possible solution for parents, enabling them to take more control of their child’s education. For my daughter and

Charter schools are all the buzz in the media lately; they are what seems to be the sensible response to the path traditional public schools are heading, down the drain. However, charter schools still face many obstacles and issues, stemming from the fact that they are far less regulated than their public school counterparts. This enacts issues including lack of quality control, increased segregation, and severe misuse of funds. Likewise, charter schools are only going to become increasingly more competitive and higher quality if their closest competitors follow that path, meaning the most successful charters are the ones compared directly to private schools. Since charters are also attempting to make a profit, they will go to all extents, including discrimination to bring up the scores, and therefore gain more leverage in negotiating for more funds. Simply enough, the most logical and simple way to prevent charter schools from degrading in quality or becoming out of control is to put more regulation on them, while still allowing them to maintain many characteristics of an independent charter.

Consequently, I questioned whether the alternative education system adequately prepares these students for the modern world. Likewise, I have doubts that the DL system is superior to the traditional education system, as Caesar suggests. Onward, she mentions how the alternative system is cheaper and more inclusive, but there was no numerical evidence to support this claim. Personally, I believe the DL system may be too lenient because some youths need structure in their lives because routines can provide stability and thus motivations and incentives to succeed. Plus, the alternative education system does not reflect the real world consisting of flexible and changing market demands and emerging innovations. Thus, I believe students must adapt to a fixed system by finding pathways to make a system work for them, rather than already being handed a purified system. Nevertheless, I believe the existence of both systems is ideal because the DL system is still highly effective for a certain group of students, but a single education system can never be an optimal fit for every student as we all learn

Charter schools are unique public schools that are allowed the freedom to be more innovative while being held accountable for advancing student achievement (what is a charter school 2017). Because they are public schools, they are open to all children; do not charge tuition; and do not have special entrance requirements. The core of the charter school model is the belief that public schools should be held accountable for student learning (what is a charter school 2017). In exchange for this accountability, school leaders should be given freedom to do whatever it takes to help students achieve and should share what works with the broader public school system so that all students benefit (what is a charter school

Charter schools are public institutions, supported by public funds. The have greater freedom from state rules and regulations than a traditional public school. Charter schools are typically free to design curriculum, and promote certain standards. A charter school must negotiate a contract or “charter”, usually with a local school district designed by the state. Each charter may vary, because each state has different education laws.

Education is a very important part of a person’s life. Every parent want the best thing for their children. They want their children to be happy and to be able to achieve their dreams and be what they want to be, which is why they want the best education for their children. Because, almost everyone would agree that being well – educated is the closest way to success life and good future. But, their desire to send their kids to the best school have to face many obstacles. One of these obstacles would be choosing school for their kids. In the U.S., there are three types of school: public school, charter school and private school. Private schools are usually very selective, has better performance than government-funded school and has expensive tuition fee. Rich families would send their kids to private schools because they could afford the expense. However, for a normal family, paying the expense for private schools would be overwhelming. So, there options are narrowed between charter schools and public schools. There have been many debates on whether charter schools or public schools provide students with better education. But, there are obvious evidences that charter schools are generally better than public schools:

Education is a very important aspect in society and is valued by parents, politicians, educators, and others in the community. The education of children is a vital role in any organized system because the future depends on those who are young to take over in the cycle of society. The institutions that provide children with an education can be divided into two categories known as traditional public schools and nontraditional schools. Nontraditional schools provide students with different learning environments compared to traditional schools and some specific examples of these schools are magnet schools, charter schools, and virtual schools (Newberry). All of these schools are relatively new and have controversial views across the country.

Are charter schools better or worse than public schools? This question has been in debate sense the idea of it was first proposed by Ray Budde, an education professor, in 1974. This was an alternative to the public school and would function more like a private business. This would allow charter schools to function without tuition or religious affiliation. In addition, it would not be subjected to many state laws and district regulations but be more accountable for student outcomes Are charter schools better or worse than public schools may be the wrong question a better enquiry may be how have they helped or hurt the education system as a whole.

Some may argue that we should introduce this new system into all of our schools. While there is a slight chance that using this new method in our school system may benefit us, there would be many shortcomings that would outweigh the good things about it. Although I believe that we should be persistent with our current system, there are minimal changes that could be made to enhance it. Any of the alterations that could be done to improve our system would be minor,

Since 1805 public schools have been the backbone of many Americans and their strive for an education. On top of this, public schools, according to the Huffington Post, equate to 91% or 50.7 million of those attending pre-Kindergarten through the 12th grade. But, with other school types such as year-round attending over 2 million students, the question begs, “Which school type provides their students with the best education”?