Chaucer is one of the first authors to use rape in English literature (Schaus). Representations of rape occur with some consistency in several of Chaucer’s works, for example an attempted rape in “The Man of Law’s Tale” and the rape of a both a mother and daughter in “The Reeve’s Tale” (Schaus). His usage of rape was possibly inspired by his own speculated distribute with rape. On May 4, 1380, Cecily Chaumpaigne brought a deed of release into the Chancery of Richard II and had it recopied by a clerk on the back of the sheets of parchment used to record the "closed" or sealed letters sent by the king. In this deed, Chaumpaigne wrote "omnimodas acciones tam de raptu meo tam de aliqua alia re vel causa". The modern English translation roughly reads that Chaumpaigne released the poet Geoffrey Chaucer from all manner of actions such as they relate to my raptus or any other thing or cause (Cannon).
However, the cited evidence cited does not prove conclusively that Chaucer was guilty of rape. In discussions of the word raptus, one controversial issue has been what the word directly translates to. On the one hand, several scholars are certain that rape or forced coitus is the only acceptable translation of raptus in this period, on the other many linguistic scholars argues the language of rape- raptus, ravysement, and rape, was so ambiguous in the fourteenth century that it could mean either forced coitus or abduction, often for the purpose of marriage (Cannon). The latter’s theory
In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, people in Salem, Massachusetts experience a barrage of court trials in which people were persecuted and sentenced to death. These persecutions divided families and divided communities, but for some, there were opposing results. John and Elizabeth Proctor, who are in a struggling relationship, undergo an unusual change in one another. At first, John and Elizabeth Proctor are a couple that is uncomfortable around each other. John Proctor was committing adultery with their household servant named Abigail Williams.
Geoffrey Chaucer’s famous medieval classic, The Canterbury Tales, offers its readers a vast array of characters. This God’s plenty features numerous unique and challenging individuals, but there is one specifically who stands out as particularly interesting. The immoral Pardoner, who, in a sense, sells away his soul for the sake of his own avarice, puzzles many modern readers with his strange logic. Already having laid his considerable guilt upon the table, this corrupted agent of the Church attempts to pawn off his counterfeit relics for a generous price. His actions are slightly troubling and mysterious, but his shameless misdeed is easily explainable if a reader chooses to interpret the man as a symbol rather than a fully formed human
The Canterbury Tales also present a number of shockingly bizarre for their time descriptions of lust and adultery. In a lot of stories old men in their sixties are shown having young wives, which was probably common in Chaucer’s times. In one example, from the Merchant’s tale, old January, unwilling to die single, decides to marry, but demands that his wife must be younger than twenty. Later in the story, January’s young wife cheats on him in a tree after he had gone blind. “He cast two eyes up to the tree,/ and saw that Damian had managed his wife/ in such a way as may not be expressed/ unless I would speak discourteously.” (Chaucer 293). In the example from the Wife of Bath, lusty human nature led one of the king’s knights to raping a girl. “It happened that he saw a maiden/ walking before him, alone as she was born./ And from this maiden then, against her will,/ and by pure force, he took her maidenhood.” (Chaucer 223). Again, even though neither the knight, January, nor his wife May suffered any serious
Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales are some of the most widely read and anthologized pieces of medieval poetry. These tales are generally celebrated and enjoyed because of the author’s use of wit and satire, as Chaucer often uses word play and characterization to deliver hard-hitting, yet entertaining truths about his time period. This is the case in “The Miller’s Tale,” which portrays the story of a carpenter with an adulterous wife and the shenanigans that take place during and after one of her affairs. After closely examining “Absalom’s Revenge,” the last section of this tale, it is clear to see that Chaucer uses language, puns, and other writing techniques to provide a commentary on the lewdness of some who lived during the Middle Ages.
This is a tough question to answer, because I believe Madison was wrong when writing to Jefferson when it comes to today’s society. Yet, I believe he was correct when pertaining the readings we have gone through in the class so far. When you look at the bill rights I think perhaps one of the most important parts is the freedom of speech. Yet, that was clearly violated in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson when Plessy was arrested for sitting on the white part of the train. You could even go further to say that he also had the right to do so under the freedom to petition section in the first amendment. A more broad or difficult approach that could be taken to try and answer this question is bringing into the conversation state power. Time and time
Thesis: The Pardoner is a hypocrite, who speaks against the exploitation, gluttony, and exaction he commits his self. However, by unfolding the story of his own dishonesty, the pardoner actually instills others not to follow his exemplar. Chaucer makes it possible to shrewdly disapprove the exploitative practices of the Catholic Church in his text with the pardoner’s character, while supporting the basic religious beliefs that the church stood for. Chaucer portrays the pardoner as someone who takes advantage of his status in society and uses it for manipulation of ordinary people. "
Heartaches is an age-old story about two broken souls finding refuge together. Anna Simmons, young, damaged, lonely and still finding her way, is thrown off the deep end, which is where she meets Rafe Brown, the tortured ex-army commando who is struggling under the weight of his past. Together, they start their journey of healing, justice, lust, and love.
“The Miller's Tale” in the Canterbury Tales provides insight into the morality of people of medieval England by showing the Miller’s views on religion, heroic ideals, and common morality. Religion at this time was defined by a religious code outlined in the Bible and the ten commandments. Even though all men were expected to live by these laws, those closely related to the church, like Absalom, were expected to never break from these codes. Heroism involved a set of ideals that were meant to guide men to a heroic state of being. A hero was supposed to seek revenge and never let a crime go unpunished. Common morality was the behavioral code all men were expected to follow and it is essentially what we now call common courtesy. This
Chaucer’s most brutal attack was on the high ranking class and nobility, his use of satire allowed for him to make accusations of their lack of accountability for their actions. This concept was outlined in the Wife of Bath’s Tale, where a young knight physically assaulted a maiden the instance was brought to a court of the king and the knight was then sentenced to execution. The queen, however, chose to spare the knight’s life if he was able to find what women desired most within one year. He returned to the court a year later and revealed that women wanted freedom more than anything, and in return he was forced to marry an old lady that revealed the secret to him. This was what taught him the ultimate lesson. The old lady made a deal with the knight, he could have her old and ugly, but loyal or he could have a young and beautiful wife that he could not trust; when presented with the choice the knight chose to let the woman decide. “The knight thought long, and with a piteous groan at last he said, with the care in life, “My lady and my love, my dearest wife, I leave the matter to your wise decision. You make the choice yourself, for the provision of what may be agreeable and right in honor to us both, I don't care which; whatever pleases you suffices me.” (lines 374-381) The knight has learned that he cannot control his wife and have her love him, as a result of this revelation the lady changes herself into a loyal and beautiful wife. This lesson
The manifestation of Chaucer’s perceptions lie in the actual tale as well as the prologue of The Wife of Bath when power is no more than momentarily relinquished to a man non-consensually through rape. Power is hastily regained by women when the rapist’s fate is put
While on the way to venerate Saint Thomas Becket’s remains, the entertainment of Chaucer’s Canterbury pilgrims falls upon the requiting of stories between the different estates. However, this requiting quickly turns malicious, the Host’s simple proposition evolving into an aggressive show of social dominance that includes the boasting of both literal and metaphorical rape. The normalization (or, borderline reverence) of aggressive manliness contributes to the creation of both rape culture and compulsory heterosexuality. Consequently, when a man does not dominate a woman—or, does not use his masculinity to humiliate another man—he is seen as weak or effeminate, subsequently placing his sexuality under scrutiny. Such is the motive behind John and Aleyn’s rape of the miller’s wife and daughter—to make Symkin seem weak, and to gain a reputation of superior masculinity. Thus,
In terms of literary quality, Chaucer went great lengths to give all elements a bit of attention. The work is primarily about a knight who is pardoned from a rape on the condition that he acquires the answer to one of life’s
Chaucer’s Wife of Bath gives the reader a glimpse into the world of medieval women and at the same time is a commentary on Chaucer’s view of deficiencies of his world. In the Knight’s Tale, the reader sees a resistance to the rights of women, typical of the medieval period and in the Wife’s Tale there is a peek at the beginning of the sovereignty of women of their own
In Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, an eclectic mix of people gathers together at Tabard Inn to begin a pilgrimage to Canterbury. In the General Prologue, the readers are introduced to each of these characters. Among the pilgrims are the provocative Wife of Bath and the meek Pardoner. These two characters both demonstrate sexuality, in very different ways. Chaucer uses the Wife and the Pardoner to examine sexuality in the medieval period.
Judith A. Weise puts forth one of the more shocking theories concerning the Second Nun's Tale in her essay Chaucer's Tell-Tale Lexicon: Romancing Seinte Cecyle. Weise argues that Chaucer's purpose for writing the saint's tale as a self-imposed literary penance for the "raptus" of Cecilia Chaumpaigne. She posits: