Chavez 's Control Of The State Oil Company

The “Bolivarian revolution” revolves around the rise of the leftest movement which started with Hugo Chavez, and soon many other leaders rose to the occasion. The sole purpose of this movement was to help Latin America get rid of dictators and reestablish under Simon Bolivar's ideals of making Latin America not a colony but a nation for the people residing in it. Now that Chavez is dead, I believe that he was able to complete Bolivar's conquest of freeing Latin America. Now that Chavez has passed away, he has left both good and bad implications, but I believe its more good than bad. “The real opposition to Chavez is from the United States which was so angry at the way that he built up a credible alternative to the U.S. idea of free trade with

Chavez decided to then launch a boycott of two of Delano's main growers, Schenley Industries and DiGiorgio. Chavez organized a massive march of 300 miles from Delano to Sacramento, the state capital. This is the longest protest march ever in the United States. Not only was it a march, it was a journey that drew the Catholic faith of many of the strikers. Marchers sang “Nosotros Venceremos” the civil rights anthem as they carried portraits of the Virgin of Guadalupe, which is Mexico’s saint and symbol of hope, they also carried large crosses representing Christ's final journey and flags including the NFWA's black eagle. As the march made its way across California, hope built, and in each town they passed through, they attracted new supporters.

On January 26th, 2017 at approximately 1943 hours, my partner Officer Presley #2100 and I responded to 829 Capp St. in a marked patrol vehicle in full uniform, regarding a missing individual.

Venezuela, located in the Latin American region, is a country that has been characterized by its abundance of oil reserve. A natural resource that has shaped the history and development of the country, affecting its economic, social and most important is political spheres. For many years Venezuela was controlled by authoritarian regimes. The country, being very important in the sense of geo-politics due to its abundance of oil, has been a key player in the international arena and most important, to those that for many years kept the country under their regime. It was not until 1958 that Venezuela experienced the change to democracy and a stable democracy was kept between the two main political parties of the time, Accion Democratica (AD)

The United States and Venezuela have not had been the best relations with one another. Now that the former President Hugo Chávez has passed away, there are still high hopes for the US that all of that will change. Currently, Venezuela is in a tight struggle right now and if it were not for the US they would be still standing. Venezuela is powerful when it comes to their oil, and have very strong polices: however these policies are not working like before so there are some considerations that might be an eye opener for you. Presenting that Venezuela should be giving with their assets the way the Americans are giving with theirs.

him great perspective of a ruler. Venezuela was a significant oil exporter and in the 1980s, there

Issue: In Venezuela, the United Socialist Party (PSUV) has been in the power 18 years first with Chavez and them with Maduro, both elected by democratic elections. Now the country is divided into two significant groups Chavistas, people who support socialism and the actual president, and opposition, people anti-government and believe the corruption of the actual president. With this, the country is immersed in extreme violence, constants violations of humans rights and alarm power corruption. Additionally, some problems that the dictatorship produces like protests, the end of commercial relations with other countries, and the decreasing economy. The abuse of power leading to incrust the violations of humans right is the significant issue that Venezuela has to face today. This has an extended history that began in 1999, with the victory of Chavez in the name of socialism, but the break in the government started when Maduro raises in power and with the end of relations with the United States, who was the principal oil buyer. As well, the counting falling oil prices had decreased the Venezuela’s economy and limited the public inversion that the government used to do. With bad relations and an affected economy poverty, violence and discomfort with the government began. The corrupt power and constant violation of human rights are affecting in significant ways the country, particularly in the investment that the government

“Venezuela reads like a textbook example of the socialist end-game: Social implosion driven by economic collapse, caused by shockingly self-destructive policy making” (Toro 39). “Socialism of the 21st Century” in the end just did not work and had failed. The changes made to the constitution have created a government that runs inefficiently and gives the president too much power. Chavez mismanaged the country's income and caused inflation of the Bolivar Note. Chavez had good intentions, but his programs to help the impoverished failed because of poor management. These people that he was trying to help are now more hurt than they were before because money put into these programs was not used effectively. This money could have been used to invest in the oil reserves and other parts of the economy to set the country up for success. Food is hard to come by and the crime and murder rate continues to raise. The country in debt and cannot even buy imports to sell to its citizens. Venezuela will need outside help if it is to recover from the situation caused by Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro. The only reason Chavez remained popular in Venezuela is because the economy was doing well in the beginning and he was able to control the media so that the public opinion of him was kept

Before the 60’s Mexico has experience a growth in their economy that was called the “Mexican miracle” because of the growth from 3% to 4% in just few time. However, after this period of growth, what followed was decades of debt. “In the late 1960s, Latin America

In addition to the challenging economic policy issues it is confronting, Brazil has simultaneously been in a very fragile political state ever since the Petrobras scandal investigation, known as Operation Lava Jato (Carwash), was initiated in 2014. In order to appreciate the significance of the Petrobras scandal and its negative impact on the people’s trust, it is important to comprehend the significance of Petrobras, the state-owned oil giant, and its role in Brazilian society. In Galster’s 2009 article, he discusses the nationalization of the oil industry in Brazil, the creation of Petrobras, and how it acquired its power and political influence. Galster emphasizes how the oil industry barely existed fifty years ago, and that it became very successful due to shrewd policies, such as keeping up to date with the latest technologies and implementing free market mechanisms. Also, Petrobras is a multinational oil company controlled and majority owned by the Brazilian federal government, but it is traded on the stock markets around the world, unlike most other Latin American countries (Galster, 2009).

With an economy dominated by the production of oil, Venezuela has enjoyed the highest standard of living in Latin America. In spite of its success in the oil industry, agriculture and manufacturing also play important roles in Venezuela’s economy. With this in mind, it would seem as though Venezuela’s economic state has flourished. Rather, it has suffered from the effects of political influence, corruption, and poor economic management. The distribution of wealth across Venezuela has caused the elite to benefit at the cost of the working people. This is mainly due to the economic and political structure of the country. Even with the plentiful resources Venezuela possesses, it is constantly being threatened by political instability,

Now it must be mentioned that Maduro, instead of changing tack upon the death of Chavez, doubled-down on the latter’s policies and, in many cases, initiated economic policies that have further exasperated the crisis. As a result of having depleting government reserves, Maduro slashed imports including basic good like groceries and medical supplies – this was done in order to avoid having to default on foreign debt. Moreover, Maduro also made the grave mistake of responding to the impending crisis by printing money, which has caused inflation to skyrocket and exasperated the situation even further by making basic goods unaffordable. These policies coupled together have led to food shortages which have even led to food riots. While the economic policies of Chavez created the current crisis, those of Maduro has made the crisis far worse. The two men, quite simply, personified economic populism, relying on “the creation of a material base for the public’s support and the distribution of favors to constituents,” all whilst paying little heed to financial constraints (Cordova Cazar and Lopez-Bermudez 2009,

He complements each dimension with a cause of instability. The first cause of instability refers to the implications of Hugo Chavez’s hybrid regime. Naturally, hybrid regimes are very relentless to negotiation with the opposition. The piece written by Olga Correal firmly states that the implications of the Chavez Administration was to breakdown the COPEI opposition in order to maintain political dominance. This rational framework is what majorly contributed to the political instability of Venezuela. On the other hand, the economic instability refers to the result of the stagnation of the PDVSA (Petroleos de Venezuela S.A). This company as discussed in the piece contributed to the current transition from democracy to authoritarianism. Kott argues that the company was poorly managed under the Chavez Administration and that if it was taken better care of the oil revenue would be greater. Kott states that the PDVSA has had damaging impacts on Latin America and concludes by arguing that the resource curse is not essentially destabilizing Venezuela but is rather a symptom of the problem and not the cause. Therefore, this development would advocate against the hypotheses of the natural resource curse gravely impacting Venezuela. Under the Economic instability Kott disregards oil wealth as the sole

Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserves and by 1960, it became the wealthiest country in Latin America. Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), the state owned company, was the key to economic and social development in Venezuela under president Hugo Chavez. His government was settled in an environment where the oil prices were rising and the economy was booming, so he was able fund social programs and practices that were popular to the poor masses. This wealthy and growing Venezuela made Chavez to be very popular and his regime very powerful. Oil revenue accounted for nearly 90% of exports, more than 50% of government revenue, and 35% of country’s GDP.

The main purpose of the following report is to provide information about the profile of The Bolivarian Republican of Venezuela; in order to study the current situation of the country for further investigations in the future that may help to understand the opportunities and risk involve in importing and opening new markets in Venezuela.