Check And Balances

he principle of checks and balances creates a limited form of government because the constitution sets up the branches of the government and how they can only do certain things and can watch over the other branches. Also being a democracy the government cannot have all the power. Some of these checks and balances are the President appointing an official and the Congress rejected/ confirmed the official; the President vetoes a bill and the Congress overrides the veto with a vote: and lastly the judicial branch can review and say an act or order that Congress or President have put in order.

The system of Checks and Balances is broken in many ways. For instance the President had the power to make executive orders that aren’t laws but have the power of one. The president has the power to make an order and an example is order number 9066 which stated, “Presidential order signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, which authorized the

In order to protect against tyranny, a system of checks and balances was designed to keep any one of the three branches from gaining more power than another branch. According to James Madison, “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…(The three braches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc C) He thought each of the three braches could watch one another and keep them in check. They have the ability to control portions of the other branches. If one branch does something unacceptable, another branch can step in and overrule the branch in question. An example of this is that the President has the ability to veto legislation if Congress passes a law that is too extreme. At the same time, the Legislative branch has the power to override a veto by the President or even impeach the President. (Doc C) Without a system of checks and balances, one of the three branches could gain control over the others allowing tyranny. This structure framed into the constitution gave assurance that the powers would oversee each other and not allow major shifts among

The president has the power to sign bills into laws. The president also has the power to veto laws and send them back to the house. If a disagreement between the house and executive branch, the president has the authority. The president may also appoint or remove justices from their seats if needed.

Each branch in the government has a little bit of control over each other making sure not one branch gets out of hand. The president can veto congressional legislation and the president nominates judges for the courts. The Judicial branch can declare presidential acts unconstitutional and can declare laws unconstitutional as well. The Legislative branch can approve Presidential nominations, override a President’s veto, remove him or her from office, and the senate confirms the President's nominations, Congress can impeach judges and remove them from office(Doc

Have you ever wondered how the government keeps each other from being too powerful? Well, that's what checks and balances are for. Checks and balances are made to limit the powers of the president. It stops presidents from choosing cabinet members and supreme court judges, this is important because if he could then he can pick his supporters to take that job and if that happens then all the members would always agree with him. He also can’t make laws, declare war, decide how federal money is spent, and interpret laws.

According to James Madison, “…the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other … the three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc. C). This means that the three branches can check on each other and keep each other balanced and that the powers among each branch is equal. In the constitution it states, “that court can declare laws unconstitutional.” (Doc. C). This is an example of how the judicial branch can check the legislative branch so each branch has a way to check the other branches. The system of check and balances guards against tyranny because without a system of checks and balances, one branch of government may become overpowered and there may be a

James Madison can concludes that without a checks and balance system, that branches can make negative decisions. For example, congress passes a bill, that is unconstitutional and the president disagrees with. Without the check and balance system that bill becomes a law, with the checks and balance system the president can veto the bill and the judicial branch can declare the bill unconstitutional. The government is set up to be intentionally divided to assure one branch will not be able to overpower the others. The complex process of checks and balances prevents tyranny because all the branches have equal and competing

The American government is a government that the three branches limit the power of each other equally, so one branch does not get too much power through the system of Checks and Balances. In 1775, the American Revolutionary War broke out. The results showed that America was finally an independent country. With some ideas from the British history, such as philosopher John Locke, the Founding Fathers established our first government. However, the Framers had a complex time figuring out how to balance and separate powers between the three branches. As a result, the Founding Fathers instituted the Checks and Balances. The Checks and Balances works well with our government because it manages to keep all three branches’ power equal.

Today Checks and Balance are still applicable and in effect. It is a very good idea our founding fathers came up with. Also the system allowed each of the three sections to have a say in each of the others ability to exercise and authority.

Presidential power has increased immensely over recent years and little is being done in an attempt to restore the original intent of the Constitution. There are multiple factors that affect this, including the executive orders of presidents, the Constitution giving an unequal distribution of power between the executive and legislative branch, the failure to use checks and balances, and the ineffectiveness of Congress. With the lack of congressional involvement in legislative decisions, the president has the ability to take matters in their own hands.

This branch has ways to supersede the power of the other branches. President can Veto any law that Congress is trying to pass. This will deny Congress the right to pass that law. The President can put in place a Presidential order. This order holds the weight of a law but does not require Congress to vote on it prior to it being put in place. The President can appoint Judges to the Supreme Court. These Judges will carry out the mindset of the President even after his term has ended

There are many real life examples of checks and balances being used in the US. Take Andrew Jackson for example. He vetoed over 20 bills after the civil war! Another one would be in 1936, when the Supreme Court declared the NIRA and the AAA, which were 2 new deal programs passed during the Roosevelt administration unconstitutional. After the civil war, congress also overrode over 20 presidential votes!

The Judicial branch is in charge of reviewing decisions and understanding federal laws. It is in charge of explaining the laws and having the power to decide if the laws are constitutional (Brand). The Judicial Branch is different from the other branches because, the members are appointed by the president and then approved by the Senate. This branch provides a comfort for the citizens to understand that the branches are dedicated to maintain equality and make sure they are fair laws. Even though, the judicial branch doesn’t have much power, it is just as important as the other two branches.

The judicial branch carries the most power because they have the ability to settle disagreements surrounding the meaning of law.The judicial branch takes power and has the ability to rectify disagreements enclosing the meaning of law.’’Decide if laws or actions by the president are constitutional’’