Checks And Balances: The Separation Of Power

Summary: In Chapter 1, Hudson addresses the distorted views of democracy from modern-day Americans. He explains how separation of power within the government lessens the power of American citizens and ultimately alters the ideology behind a true democracy into what we have today.

The mentality of the Founding Fathers was to form a more perfect union, and to gather the ethical resources so that they could create organized and efficient structures. We have an accurate idea to the notion that our Founding Fathers were presenting and trying to establish to the modern regulations to stand. In the statement presented, “the separation of powers creates unique roles for each branch of government” (Connell). In the terms presented, the founders wanted to ensure that each branch has one specific law to enforce their own definite laws, so that everything stays in a sequence of an organized arrangement. Behind the exposures that each branch has access to, there holds many restrictions to which can be amended and can create a reliable stability to the desired needs that one wants to follow out and put into action. These certain enactments appointed others to the concern of power that each branch captivates the ideas to prove the wellbeing of our U.S. Constitution. Pursuing this further, “this system seems flawless, but the problem with this system, as any system of government, is human nature” (Connell). People have the opportunity to revolt and express their freedom of speech, to which preserve major contributions of the process to activities and operations that the government has to

The constitution included another way to guard against tyranny, the separation of powers. This is a vital mechanism to ensure the smooth running of a democracy in our government. The separation

One of the most important principles incorporated in the U.S. Constitution is separation of powers. The U.S. Constitution divided the central government into three branches and created a system of checks and balances as a way to prevent the concentration of power. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” In order to be sure that the main

Checks and balances made sure that each group balanced each other. Examples of this are how congress has the ability to impeach the president, how the president can veto the laws the legislative branch make, and how the executive branch can nominate judges(Doc C). Checks and balances made sure that one group could not sabotage the whole government. Just in case the president decided just to veto a law because he had a bad day the legislative law would be able to vote his veto out. This system is very good for preventing this abuse of power effectively. Checks and balanced allowed each group to manage each other to prevent

The structure of our American Government, was founded in the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution was written to be the “supreme law of the land”, and creates a federal democratic republic, where citizens govern themselves (Our American Governement, n.d). The purpose of our government, is to “establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity” (Our American Government, n.d.). For our country to achieve this purpose our Founding Fathers created three main principles, “inherent rights, self-government, and separation of powers” (Our American Government, n.d.). Government was developed to ensure order in society and protect its citizens, but with all systems there are strengths and weakness, let’s examine those strengths and weakness. Let’s first look at the strength and weakness of the U.S. Constitution.

Tyranny is cruelty to the people. In 1787 the Constitution was written to replace the Articles of Confederation because it just wasn’t working for the people. How will a piece of paper get rid of tyranny? Well, the constitution will create a new beginning for the government. Consisting of Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and large and small states.

Framers of the constitution feared tyranny within the government. To avoid this, checks and balances were put into place. These checks and balances of power ensured that the branches of government did not violate their respective power and that no forms of legislation should go into effect without being checked by all branches. A Just government should have this system because it provides an equal field on which the legislative, executive, and judicial branch can propose, pass, or deny bills. If we as a people are going to give someone else power,then there should be a system in which those people are checked and kept in line, so that our country remains free. Separation of power was also put into place as a way to keep all the branches equal. Each branch was given a

Third of all, Checks and Balances guards us from tyranny. James Madison says, “...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other....[The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other”(Doc C). Although, we have separate branches with separate powers, the branches shouldn’t be so far apart that they can do whatever they want. In addition, the other branches should be able to check on each other and approve of each other's doings. For instance, in Document C, The President can veto congress, but if two thirds of Congress disagree with the President's decision the Congress can override it by voting against the President’s choice. Checks and Balances ensures that the executive branch doesn’t overpower the legislative branch given that Congress can override the President's decision if it has enough votes. All in all, by having branches not too far apart. It lets each branch check on each other, so that one branch can’t just do anything they want. Having constitutional control keeps power in balance and makes sure not one branch has more power than the

Next, checks and balances is each branch of government can agree or disagree with something in other branch that keep the branch of government equally so no tyranny won't happen “(the three branches) should not be so far separated to have no constitutional control over each other”(Doc C). The legislative branch can approve presidential nominations, override president's veto and impeach the president and remove him or her from office for executive branch but for judicial branch, the senate confirms the president nomination, congress can impeach judges and remove office.The separation of power constantly prevents tyranny from happening by dividing power and each power check each other.The judicial branch can declare presidential acts unconstitutional for executive branch same as legislative branch. The check and Balance against tyranny because it let every branch check each other without putting power in one hand.

The idea of the separation of powers led to a commonality found in the US Government and its Constitution known as Checks and Balances. Checks and Balances is a system within the government that counterbalances power in the system to keep the power even throughout the branches of government. Without Checks and Balances, one branch could continually override another in its personal favor. This fell in line with many philosophers beliefs. John locke’s belief that human nature causes free thinking. It’s human nature to be greedy, so checks and balances balance the human will to have power with the human nature to be power hungry.

America and its balance of government branches haven’t always been orderly. Under the Articles of Confederation, the legislative branch held an overwhelming amount of power over the two other branches. Not only did this apply to branches, but also between states and localities. At the Constitutional Convention, the Framers examined the need of balance, and with that, separation of powers and checks and balances were formed.

Separation of powers is dividing up the power for the branches of government, so no branch can hold more power than the other. The three branches of government are legislative branch, executive branch and the judicial branch. The power is equal and not unfair to another branch. The legislative branch makes laws, the executive applies laws and the judicial clarifies them (O’Connor, 2016 p.28-29). The checks and balance system is a very unique system we have in the government. This lets another branch have a say to what one branch wants to do. This is known as each branch has limited power and one can either allow or deny an action they are trying to get done. This was created by the framers to avoid a tranny from the other branch (O’Connor, 2016 p.30). This concept has helped the government in many ways. Examples of checks and balance

Checks and balances does not separate the powers, rather it expands off of it. Checks and balances gives each entity of government a different advantage over the other.

A common characteristic that contributes to the practices of democracy is the concept of checks and balances. James Madison, the fourth president quoted "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." These checks and balances are primarily used to assure that the government or no branches or offices of the government hold to much power. The term “separation of powers” is somewhat inaccurate in terms of the powers are not actually be divided but they are ideally shared. The founding fathers of this country believed that unrestrained power is dangerous, and is a good thing the president and court check each other along with the state and federal governments. For example, the Congress is in charge of making the laws and other legislature authority but the president can veto that bill. In return, the president is also limited because the congress can then override the veto by 2/3 of the majority. The