Chief Piprsig Case Summary

FACTS: Douglas E. Metzger lived in an apartment in Lincoln, Nebraska. About 7:45 a.m on April 30, 1981 a residence of the apartment complex was parking his vehicle directly in front of Metzger’s apartment window. Metzger was standing naked with his arms at his side for five seconds. At 8:00 a.m two officers had arrived to the apartment, they observed Metzger standing naked in front of the window eating cereal. The officers said that Metzger was nude from mid-thigh on up and he was standing a foot of the window. Douglas Metzger had violated the Lincoln Municipal Code which stated, that it was unlawful for a person in the city of Lincoln to commit any indecent exposure in the presence of another person.

Facts: John Brady (petitioner) and Charles Boblit were found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to death. Convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals in Maryland. Their trials were processed separately. At Brady’s trial, he took stand and maintained that he participated in the preceding robbery, but not in the killing. At the sentencing, both men received the death penalty. Brady’s counsel conceded that Brady was guilty of murder in the first degree, and asking the jury to return that verdict “without capital punishment. Prior to the trial counsel requested to examine Boblit’ s extra judicial statements. Several statements were shown to Petitioner’s counsel; but the one was dated on July 09, 1958, in which Boblit admitted the actual homicide, was

Living Arr: Remsley Dorvilus is an 18 year old Haitian male that resided in Union with his biological mother, 20 year old sister, and 15 year old brother. Upon youth enrollment into FACT on 4/24/18 youth was already admitted into a Specialize Residential Treatment Program. Remsley only stayed in the first Specialize Residential Treatment Program for three days before he signed himself out of treatment against program recommendation.

The chief would be willing to take any drastic decision, which will more likely be firing Officer Thompson. 7) What was the best (1) criticism of your decision and how you would respond to it? - Objection: The chief would not listen to her because he knows that taking drastic actions is recognizing that horrible things happened while he was the head of the police department. -Response: Because the chief is an ethical person he would not care about what would happen to him or his job since he is interested in doing the right

To rebut petitioner McCleskey's alibi defense at his 1978 Georgia trial for murder and a related crime, the State called Officer Evans, the occupant of the jail cell next to McCleskey's, who testified that McCleskey had admitted and boasted about the killing. On the basis of this and other evidence supporting McCleskey's guilt, the jury convicted him and sentenced him to death. After the State Supreme Court affirmed, he filed an unsuccessful petition for state habeas corpus relief, alleging, inter alia, that his statements to Evans were elicited in a situation created by the State to induce him to make incriminating statements without the assistance of counsel in violation of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 . He then filed his first

On July 20, 2015, I Deputy Burge was dispatched to the Rhodes residence located at 705 CR 3580 in Wood County in reference to a burglary of a residence. Upon My arrival, I spoke with Hayden Rhodes who advised that his home had been burglarized while he was gone from the home. MR. Rhodes advised that there are no signs of forced entry due to the back door of the residence being unlocked.

In this week’s scenario situation is a bit confusing with the actions of Officer Jones. There are the actions that he left a victim unattended while in an investigate state. It was later found that it was a domestic violence situation which could have ended with her husband returning to harm her. The actions of Officer Jones making contact with who he assumed were the actor was wrong. There are departmental policies as well as training in the proper manner to handle situations. His actions, in my view, if I was reviewing the use of force would not be justified. There are several procedure requirements that he violated that resulted in the use of deadly force.

Kerry Middleton is a fifty-two year old Caucasian male and is currently married to his wife Sherrifor more than 20 years. For the past several months Kerry has been experiencing night sweats,repetitive nightmares and extreme amounts of anxiety. Most nights Sherri has to wake him aftersweating profusely and shaking in his sleep. When he is finally woken up, it becomes difficult for him tofall back to sleep. During the daytime Kerry has reported feeling terribly disconnected to hissurroundings. He often finds himself in a place of despair and self-hatred. Kerry daily indulges in anenormous amount of alcohol and from time-to-time recreational drugs to convince him-self thateverything is going to be ok. Up until a few months ago Kerry was the Chief

The accused who is named Paul Kingston was convicted of failing to sustain a logbook which is mandatory from the section 190(3) of the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990. This section of the act states that every driver shall maintain a daily log and shall carry it at all times while in charge of a commercial motor vehicle on the highway. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 190 (3). On December 9th 2003 the appellant was pulled over in the Town of Sunderland, in the Region of Durham by Officer Constable Hominsky. The accused was driving a three-axle tractor and hauling a four-axle gravel container. After he was pulled over he presented the log book which was not updated then the officer requested him to update the book and after doing so it showed that the

According to Use Of Force Report submitted by Officer Ratchford dated: (06/17/2017), she was assigned to 11A escort post. In sum and substance Officer Ratchford reported, when she exited the rest room as the probe team was entering the area. Officer Ratchford observed the Capt. Rivera, Capt. Khan, Officers Mitchell, Martinez and Maria relinquish the inmate to the probe team. The probe team guided the inmate to his feet at which time this writer recognized the inmate to be Wallace. Officer Ratchford did not witness or utilized force.

The Senate Blue Ribbon Committee summoned Victor Limlingan, brother of Gerry Limlingan; an alleged dummy of VP Binay on August 20, 2015 in connection with the corruption charges filed against the Vice President. The committee questioned Victor Limlingan on the whereabouts of his brother. However, Victor denied any knowledge about his brother's current location and activities. Senator Antonio Trillanes IV, skeptical of the veracity and truthfulness of Victor Limlingan's statements proceeded to encourage the latter to divulge any information which may be of value in the quest to locate the supposed dummy. In response, Victor continued to deny any cover up from their end. Instead, he insisted that Gerry made strict instructions not to contact

The investigator reviewed the background to both allegation/ complaint levelled against Warden Keith Gorsuch of Sanchez Unit by unit security supervisor Captain Aguayo, Jose and Sergeant Guillen, Cesar. It was motivated to determine the authenticity or otherwise of the following allegations;

Upon review of the Rixton Case study, indications of inadequacies in and ineffective management on behalf of the Rixton Police Chief provide evidence of non-compliance of departmental procedures and the lack of accountability of the Chief of police to his officers and citizens and that of the officers alike to the citizens or Rixton. As the Rixton case study indicates the Chief Eager has “little administrative ability” and “he makes no effort to determine whether his officers understand his policies and procedures...” (Police Administration, 2016), as such, an inference can be made that the principles adopted by the officers is in direct correlation with the lack of accountability within the department. Cordner suggests that assumption should

It’s difficult to understand how any officer could graduate from a police academy and not have a thorough understanding of Graham v. Connor. It is even more difficult for me to understand how the leader of an organization who must know the law to protect his officers can fail to understand the law.

In a matter of hours, Julie Taylor, director of Human Resources at Danville Airlines in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, would have to make a difficult recommendation to the airline’s board of directors.